AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Plan B

skill-masterleopold-anty-framework-plan-b · by masterleopold

Plan B framework — 6 environmental forces monitoring, pre-mortem 5-step process, scenario planning with auto-trigger points, Devil's Advocate on every proposal, 100-day gate reviews, S-curve awareness, 5 hurdles to Plan B execution, boomerang prevention. Use when preparing contingencies, monitoring environmental changes, or when the current plan shows signs of failure.

No reviews yet
0 installs
42 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-masterleopold-anty-framework-plan-b

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-masterleopold-anty-framework-plan-b)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Plan B? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Plan B Framework

When to Apply

  • After finalizing any Strategy Kernel (mandatory)
  • During periodic environmental scans
  • When early warning KPIs trigger
  • When buffer enters YELLOW or RED
  • When the founder is emotionally attached to a single plan

Core Framework

6 Environmental Forces

Monitor continuously. Any shift can invalidate the current strategy:

| Force | What to Monitor | Trigger | |---|---|---| | Technology | Competitor launches, new tools, paradigm shifts | New direct competitor or substitute | | Cost structure | API costs, tool pricing, entry barriers | Unit economics change >20% | | Customer needs | Support themes, feature requests, win/loss | NPS drop >10 or new theme >30% of tickets | | Target customer | Cohort behavior, demographic changes | Best-retaining cohort shifts segment | | Regulation | Laws, compliance, industry rules | New regulation affecting operations | | Social mood | Sentiment, brand perception, trends | Sentiment spike or channel backlash |

Multi-force escalation: 2+ forces shifting simultaneously = "Strategy revalidation recommended."

Pre-Mortem (5-Step Process)

  1. Assume total failure: "It is 6 months from now. This strategy has completely failed."
  2. Enumerate 3-5 specific failure causes (concrete, not vague)
  3. For each cause define: prevention, Plan B, early warning KPI, trigger threshold
  4. Rank by likelihood x impact
  5. Embed triggers into monitoring for automatic Plan B activation

Scenario Planning with Auto-Triggers

Four scenarios with QUANTITATIVE trigger points:

| Scenario | Trigger | Auto-Response | |---|---|---| | OPTIMISTIC | Exceeds target by 20%+ | Continue scaling, increase targets | | BASE | 80-120% of target | Maintain strategy, increase constraint effort | | PESSIMISTIC | Buffer RED + growth 90% + negative growth for 2 weeks | Full strategy reset |

Auto-activation removes bias. Pre-commit to switching. Don't decide in the moment when sunk cost fallacy, loss aversion, and status quo bias are strongest.

Devil's Advocate (On Every Proposal)

Standard output, not optional add-on:

Proposed: "Launch LinkedIn content campaign targeting CTOs"

Devil's Advocate:
  1. "LinkedIn organic reach declining ~15% YoY."
  2. "Segment data shows email outperforms for >$50K deals."
  3. "Requires ~10h/week founder time — 25% of capacity."

  Risk: MODERATE
  Plan B if underperforms: Warm intros via mutual connections.
  Review gate: 30 days.

100-Day Gate Reviews

After any Plan B activation:

Day 30:  [milestone] -> continue / modify / exit?
Day 60:  [milestone] -> continue / modify / exit?
Day 100: [milestone] -> continue / modify / exit?

Each gate has explicit, measurable decision criteria. Prevents drifting in the new plan.

S-Curve Awareness

Monitor where each Driver/channel sits on its lifecycle:

| Stage | Agent Behavior | |---|---| | Introduction | High effort, low returns — expected. Keep investing. | | Growth | Returns accelerating — prepare Plan B NOW | | Maturity | Returns plateauing — activate diversification | | Decline | Returns dropping — Plan B should already be active |

Critical insight: Plan B must be PREPARED during the growth phase. During decline, it's too late — you're reacting, not preparing.

5 Hurdles to Plan B Execution

Obstacles that prevent organizations from switching to Plan B:

| Hurdle | Description | Countermeasure | |---|---|---| | Sunk cost attachment | "We've invested too much to stop" | Pre-committed stop conditions (defined at launch) | | Identity attachment | "This is my idea / my baby" | Reframe: "The goal is the outcome, not the method" | | Status quo bias | "Maybe it'll turn around" | Quantitative triggers remove judgment from decision | | Loss aversion | "Stopping feels like losing" | Frame as "redirecting resources to higher-impact approach" | | Social commitment | "We told investors/team this plan" | Distinguish pitch narrative from operational reality |

Boomerang Prevention

When switching to Plan B, ensure you don't oscillate back to Plan A:

Plan B Activation:
  1. Log WHY Plan A was abandoned (specific data, not feelings)
  2. Define conditions under which Plan A would be reconsidered
     (must be DIFFERENT conditions, not just "things got better")
  3. Set minimum commitment period for Plan B (typically 60-90 days)
  4. Track Plan B independently — don't compare to Plan A's
     peak performance (cherry-picking)

The agent monitors for oscillation patterns (A->B->A) and halts: "You're oscillating. Each reversal wastes accumulated progress. Commit to the current plan for [minimum period] before reconsidering."

Decision Rules

  1. Plan B is mandatory — no Strategy Kernel without contingency
  2. Auto-triggers are pre-committed — quantitative, not judgment-based
  3. Devil's Advocate on every proposal — standard output, not optional
  4. Prepare during growth — S-curve timing is critical
  5. 100-day gates after activation — prevent drifting
  6. No oscillation — minimum commitment period before switching back
  7. 5 hurdles are psychological — countermeasures are structural (pre-commitment, triggers)

Anti-Patterns to Detect

| Anti-Pattern | Signal | Response | |---|---|---| | Single-plan thinking | No Plan B defined | "What happens if this fails? Define triggers and alternatives now." | | Late preparation | No contingency until crisis | "S-curve: prepare Plan B during growth, not decline." | | Bias-driven switching | Emotional reaction to single bad week | "Check against pre-committed triggers. Single-week data is noise." | | Oscillation | A->B->A pattern | "Each reversal wastes progress. Commit for [minimum period]." | | Plan B avoidance | Triggered conditions ignored | "Pre-committed conditions met. Present the switching decision." | | Missing Devil's Advocate | Proposal without counter-arguments | "Every proposal includes structured counter-arguments. Add them." |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.