AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Torque

skill-mattjaikaran-torque-torque · by mattjaikaran

Torque: a Claude Code skill that converts GSD (project management) and Superpowers (engineering discipline) into one coherent workflow. Prevents double-planning, conflicting subagent models, and overlapping design capture by providing a single routing decision at task start.

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mattjaikaran-torque-torque

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Torque? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Torque — GSD + Superpowers, United

Core Rule

Check for .planning/ directory in the project root. This single check determines routing.

Primary Routing Table

| Scenario | .planning/ exists? | System | Entry Point | |----------|---------------------|--------|-------------| | New project (greenfield) | No → creates it | GSD | /gsd:new-project | | Brownfield onboarding | No → creates it | GSD | /gsd:map-codebase then /gsd:new-project | | New feature in GSD project | Yes | GSD | /gsd:discuss-phase/gsd:spec-phase/gsd:plan-phase/gsd:execute-phase | | AI/LLM integration phase | Yes | GSD | /gsd:ai-integration-phase/gsd:plan-phase/gsd:execute-phase/gsd:eval-review | | Quick task in GSD project | Yes | GSD | /gsd:quick | | Trivial fix in GSD project | Yes | GSD | /gsd:fast (inline, no subagents) | | Standalone feature (no GSD) | No | SP | REQUIRED: brainstormingwriting-planssubagent-driven-development | | PRD-driven feature | Either | SP → GSD | write-a-prdprd-to-issues/gsd:new-project or /gsd:add-phase | | Bug fix (any context) | Either | SP first | REQUIRED: systematic-debugging ALWAYS first, then route fix through appropriate system | | Code review (send) | Either | SP | REQUIRED: requesting-code-review (fills GSD's missing review step) | | Code review (receive) | Either | SP | receiving-code-review — verify feedback before implementing blindly | | Stress-test a plan | Either | SP | grill-me — interview until all ambiguity is resolved | | Architecture improvement | Either | SP | improve-codebase-architecture — surface friction, propose refactors as RFC issues | | Ship / PR creation | Yes | GSD | /gsd:ship or /gsd:pr-branch (filters .planning/ commits) | | Ship (standalone) | No | SP | finishing-a-development-branch | | Resume work | Yes | GSD | /gsd:resume-work | | Resume work | No | SP | Re-read plan files in docs/plans/ |

Extended Routing (GSD 1.34+)

| Scenario | Entry Point | Notes | |----------|-------------|-------| | Spec refinement | /gsd:spec-phase | Socratic clarification of WHAT a phase delivers — produces SPEC.md before planning | | AI/LLM design contract | /gsd:ai-integration-phase | Framework selection, implementation guidance, evaluation strategy → AI-SPEC.md | | AI eval audit | /gsd:eval-review | Retroactive audit of AI phase evaluation coverage | | Spike (feasibility test) | /gsd:spike/gsd:spike-wrap-up | Throwaway experiment to validate approach before committing | | Sketch (UI mockup) | /gsd:sketch/gsd:sketch-wrap-up | Rapid HTML mockups with multi-variant exploration | | UI/frontend phase | /gsd:ui-phase/gsd:ui-review | Design contract (UI-SPEC.md) before implementation | | Security audit | /gsd:secure-phase | Verify threat mitigations post-implementation | | Codebase intelligence | /gsd:intel | Query, refresh, or inspect .planning/intel/ | | Code review + auto-fix | /gsd:code-review/gsd:code-review-fix | Two-step: find issues, then fix atomically | | Autonomous execution | /gsd:autonomous | Runs all remaining phases: discuss → plan → execute | | Parallel workstreams | /gsd:workstreams | Manage concurrent work across features | | Persistent debugging | /gsd:debug | 4-phase debugging with knowledge base persistence | | Phase assumptions | /gsd:list-phase-assumptions | Surface Claude's assumptions before planning | | Nyquist validation | /gsd:validate-phase | Audit and fill validation gaps for a completed phase | | Milestone audit | /gsd:audit-milestone/gsd:plan-milestone-gaps | Verify intent delivered, fill gaps | | Ship / PR creation | /gsd:ship | Create PR, run review, prepare for merge | | Clean PR branch | /gsd:pr-branch | Filter out .planning/ commits for clean code review | | Safe revert | /gsd:undo | Roll back phase or plan commits using phase manifest | | Project statistics | /gsd:stats | Phases, plans, git metrics, timeline | | Session report | /gsd:session-report | Token usage estimates and work summary | | Docs generation | /gsd:docs-update | Generate/update project docs verified against codebase | | Changelog | changelog-generator (SP) | Auto-generate user-facing changelogs from git commits | | Diagnostics | /gsd:health | Diagnose and repair .planning/ directory issues | | Post-mortem | /gsd:forensics | Investigate failed GSD workflows | | Learnings extraction | /gsd:extract_learnings | Extract decisions, patterns, surprises from completed phases |

Idea Capture & Backlog

| Scenario | Entry Point | Notes | |----------|-------------|-------| | Quick note | /gsd:note | Zero-friction idea capture — append, list, or promote | | Add todo | /gsd:add-todo | Capture task from conversation context | | Check todos | /gsd:check-todos | List pending todos and select one to work | | Backlog idea | /gsd:add-backlog | Park an idea in 999.x numbering | | Review backlog | /gsd:review-backlog | Promote backlog items to active milestone | | Plant seed | /gsd:plant-seed | Forward-looking idea with trigger conditions | | Explore idea | /gsd:explore | Socratic ideation — think before committing |

Browser & E2E Testing

| Scenario | Entry Point | Notes | |----------|-------------|-------| | Test web app | webapp-testing (SP) | Playwright-based: screenshots, form fills, link checks | | Full browser automation | playwright-skill (SP) | Auto-detect dev servers, write test scripts |

Two-Layer Model

  • GSD = macro layer: project structure, milestones, phases, plans, state tracking, pause/resume
  • Superpowers = micro layer: TDD, debugging methodology, verification, code review per task

GSD orchestrates WHAT to build and in what order. Superpowers enforce HOW to build each piece correctly.

Torque Commands

| Command | Purpose | |---------|---------| | /torque:status | Where am I? Single view across GSD + SP state | | /torque:check | Verify GSD + SP installation and detect misconfigurations | | /torque:next | Smart next-action — reads state, suggests one command | | /torque:migrate | Upgrade path to Meridian |

Integration Rules (Summary)

  1. Plan location: GSD uses .planning/phases/, SP uses docs/plans/. Never mix.
  2. Brainstorming: Use discuss-phase for GSD work, brainstorming for standalone only. Never both.
  3. Subagent execution: GSD execute-phase OR SP subagent-driven-development. Never nested.
  4. Debugging: SP systematic-debugging runs first for all bugs. GSD deviation Rule 1 covers only incidental executor bugs.
  5. Code review after GSD: Run requesting-code-review after GSD verify-work, before merge.
  6. Code review receiving: When receiving review feedback, use receiving-code-review to verify suggestions before implementing blindly.
  7. UI discipline: For frontend phases, run /gsd:ui-phase to produce UI-SPEC.md before implementation, then /gsd:ui-review after.
  8. AI discipline: For AI/LLM phases, run /gsd:ai-integration-phase to produce AI-SPEC.md before implementation, then /gsd:eval-review after.
  9. Spec before plan: For medium+ features, run /gsd:spec-phase between discuss and plan to lock falsifiable requirements.
  10. Spike before commit: When feasibility is uncertain, run /gsd:spike before discuss-phase. Wrap findings with /gsd:spike-wrap-up.
  11. Ship cleanly: Use /gsd:ship or /gsd:pr-branch to create PRs that exclude .planning/ commits from code review.
  12. Learnings persist: GSD captures execution patterns automatically. Review with /gsd:intel to inform future phases.

Anti-Patterns (Never Do These)

  • Run brainstorming inside a GSD phase (use discuss-phase)
  • Create docs/plans/ in a GSD project (use .planning/phases/)
  • Nest SP subagent-driven-development inside GSD execute-phase
  • Skip systematic-debugging for bugs in GSD projects
  • Create .planning/ manually (use /gsd:new-project)
  • Use /gsd:quick for multi-phase work (use full pipeline)
  • Merge without code review (GSD has no review step built in)
  • Run both discuss-phase AND brainstorming (pick one based on .planning/ existence)
  • Implement review feedback without verifying it first (use receiving-code-review)
  • Skip spec refinement for ambiguous phases (use /gsd:spec-phase between discuss and plan)
  • Build AI features without evaluation strategy (use /gsd:ai-integration-phase first)
  • Push .planning/ commits in PRs (use /gsd:pr-branch to filter them out)
  • Commit to a large approach without spiking first (use /gsd:spike for uncertain feasibility)

Complexity Escalation

Trivial (typo, config) → /gsd:fast
Small (< 30 min, < 5 files) → /gsd:quick
Medium (single phase) → discuss → spec → plan → execute
Large (multi-phase) → new-project or add-phase pipeline
Uncertain feasibility → /gsd:spike first, then route by size
AI/LLM integration → /gsd:ai-integration-phase → plan → execute → eval-review
Autonomous (hands-off) → /gsd:autonomous

For detailed workflows and conflict resolution, load files from references/. Workflow guides are in references/workflows.md.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.