Install
$ agentstack add skill-michaelsvanbeek-personal-agent-skills-status-updates ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Status Updates
When to Use
- Writing a weekly status update for your manager or skip-level
- Preparing a monthly team summary for stakeholders
- Drafting a quarterly review for leadership
- Sharing progress with peer teams
- Communicating project health to non-technical stakeholders
- Creating a standard update format for your team
Core Principles
- Lead with outcomes, not activities — "Reduced onboarding time by 40%" beats "Worked on onboarding improvements"
- Audience-appropriate detail — Executives want headlines and risks. Peers want context. Your team wants specifics.
- Signal risks early — An update that hides problems is worse than no update at all
- Consistent cadence — Same day, same format, every cycle. Predictability builds trust.
- Concise — If your status update takes more than 5 minutes to read, it's too long
Weekly Status Update
Audience: Your manager, skip-level, peer leads Cadence: Every Friday (or Monday morning) Length: 10–15 lines max
Template
## Weekly Update — [Team Name] — Week of [Date]
### Highlights
- [Outcome or milestone achieved]
- [Outcome or milestone achieved]
### In Progress
- [Initiative] — [brief status, % complete or sprint target]
- [Initiative] — [brief status]
### Risks / Blockers
- [Risk] — [impact and mitigation plan]
- [Blocker] — [who/what is needed to unblock]
### Asks
- [Specific request with context — decision needed, resource needed, escalation]
### Next Week
- [What the team will focus on]
Guidelines
- Highlights: Max 3 items. These should be things your manager can pass upward.
- Risks: Never zero. If you can't think of any, you're not looking hard enough. "No risks" signals a lack of awareness, not a perfect sprint.
- Asks: Be specific. "Need a decision on X by Wednesday" is actionable. "Need help" is not.
Monthly Summary
Audience: Director/VP level, cross-functional stakeholders Cadence: End of each month Length: 1 page
Template
## Monthly Summary — [Team Name] — [Month YYYY]
### Key Outcomes
1. [Measurable outcome with business impact]
2. [Measurable outcome with business impact]
3. [Measurable outcome with business impact]
### OKR Progress
| Objective | KR | Current | Target | Status |
|-----------|-----|---------|--------|--------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | 🟢 On Track / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Off Track |
### Metrics
| Metric | Last Month | This Month | Trend |
|--------|-----------|------------|-------|
| Sprint velocity | ... | ... | ↑/↓/→ |
| Escaped defects | ... | ... | |
| PR cycle time | ... | ... | |
### Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Status | Mitigation |
|------|--------|-----------|
| ... | New / Active / Resolved | ... |
### Team Health
Brief note on team morale, capacity changes, hiring status.
### Next Month Focus
Top 2–3 priorities for the upcoming month.
Quarterly Review
Audience: VP/C-level, org leadership Cadence: End of each quarter Length: 2–3 pages or a short deck (5–8 slides)
Template
## Q[N] Review — [Team Name]
### TL;DR
3-sentence executive summary: what we achieved, what we missed, what's next.
### Scorecard
| Objective | Score | Highlights |
|-----------|-------|-----------|
| ... | 0.X | ... |
Overall: X.XX / 1.0
### Key Wins
- [Win with quantified impact]
- [Win with quantified impact]
### Key Misses
- [Miss with root cause and lesson learned]
### Delivery Metrics
| Metric | Q[N-1] | Q[N] | Trend |
|--------|--------|------|-------|
| Features shipped | ... | ... | |
| Incidents (P1/P2) | ... | ... | |
| Velocity (avg) | ... | ... | |
### Risks and Outlook
Active risks heading into next quarter.
### Next Quarter Preview
Top 3 themes or initiatives for Q[N+1].
Communicating to Different Audiences
Upward (Your Manager, VP, Exec)
- Lead with impact: Business outcomes, metrics, customer impact
- Be concise: 5 bullets, not 5 paragraphs
- Surface risks: They want to know what might break, not just what's going well
- Make asks explicit: Don't hint — state what you need clearly
- Use their language: Revenue, retention, velocity-to-market — not story points or tech jargon
Lateral (Peer leads, PMs, adjacent teams)
- Focus on dependencies: What you need from them, what they need from you
- Share context: They don't have your team's full picture
- Flag shared risks: Especially cross-team blockers
- Be transparent about capacity: If you can't take on their request, say so clearly
Downward (Your Team)
- Be transparent: Share company context, org decisions, reasons behind priorities
- Celebrate wins: Public recognition in team channels
- Be honest about challenges: Don't sugarcoat — the team knows when things are hard
- Show how their work connects: "This feature directly supports the company OKR on retention"
Delivery Channel
| Update Type | Channel | Format | |-------------|---------|--------| | Weekly | Team chat (channel + manager DM) or email | Text with clear sections | | Monthly | Email + shared wiki page | Longer-form with tables | | Quarterly | Wiki doc + presentation | Document + slides for review meeting | | Ad hoc (incident, launch) | Chat + email | Brief, factual, with next steps |
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Better Approach | |-------------|---------|----------------| | Activity log | "Worked on X" tells nothing about progress | State outcomes: "Shipped X, reducing Y by Z%" | | No risks section | Signals unawareness or avoidance | Always include at least one risk or watch item | | Buried asks | Buries what you need in a wall of text | Surface asks in their own section at the top | | One-size-fits-all | Same update sent to execs and the team | Tailor format and depth by audience | | Inconsistent cadence | Updates come randomly, not on schedule | Pick a day, stick to it every week |
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: michaelsvanbeek
- Source: michaelsvanbeek/personal-agent-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.