AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Status Updates

skill-michaelsvanbeek-personal-agent-skills-status-updates · by michaelsvanbeek

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
4 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-michaelsvanbeek-personal-agent-skills-status-updates

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Status Updates? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Status Updates

When to Use

  • Writing a weekly status update for your manager or skip-level
  • Preparing a monthly team summary for stakeholders
  • Drafting a quarterly review for leadership
  • Sharing progress with peer teams
  • Communicating project health to non-technical stakeholders
  • Creating a standard update format for your team

Core Principles

  1. Lead with outcomes, not activities — "Reduced onboarding time by 40%" beats "Worked on onboarding improvements"
  2. Audience-appropriate detail — Executives want headlines and risks. Peers want context. Your team wants specifics.
  3. Signal risks early — An update that hides problems is worse than no update at all
  4. Consistent cadence — Same day, same format, every cycle. Predictability builds trust.
  5. Concise — If your status update takes more than 5 minutes to read, it's too long

Weekly Status Update

Audience: Your manager, skip-level, peer leads Cadence: Every Friday (or Monday morning) Length: 10–15 lines max

Template

## Weekly Update — [Team Name] — Week of [Date]

### Highlights
- [Outcome or milestone achieved]
- [Outcome or milestone achieved]

### In Progress
- [Initiative] — [brief status, % complete or sprint target]
- [Initiative] — [brief status]

### Risks / Blockers
- [Risk] — [impact and mitigation plan]
- [Blocker] — [who/what is needed to unblock]

### Asks
- [Specific request with context — decision needed, resource needed, escalation]

### Next Week
- [What the team will focus on]

Guidelines

  • Highlights: Max 3 items. These should be things your manager can pass upward.
  • Risks: Never zero. If you can't think of any, you're not looking hard enough. "No risks" signals a lack of awareness, not a perfect sprint.
  • Asks: Be specific. "Need a decision on X by Wednesday" is actionable. "Need help" is not.

Monthly Summary

Audience: Director/VP level, cross-functional stakeholders Cadence: End of each month Length: 1 page

Template

## Monthly Summary — [Team Name] — [Month YYYY]

### Key Outcomes
1. [Measurable outcome with business impact]
2. [Measurable outcome with business impact]
3. [Measurable outcome with business impact]

### OKR Progress
| Objective | KR | Current | Target | Status |
|-----------|-----|---------|--------|--------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | 🟢 On Track / 🟡 At Risk / 🔴 Off Track |

### Metrics
| Metric | Last Month | This Month | Trend |
|--------|-----------|------------|-------|
| Sprint velocity | ... | ... | ↑/↓/→ |
| Escaped defects | ... | ... | |
| PR cycle time | ... | ... | |

### Risks and Mitigations
| Risk | Status | Mitigation |
|------|--------|-----------|
| ... | New / Active / Resolved | ... |

### Team Health
Brief note on team morale, capacity changes, hiring status.

### Next Month Focus
Top 2–3 priorities for the upcoming month.

Quarterly Review

Audience: VP/C-level, org leadership Cadence: End of each quarter Length: 2–3 pages or a short deck (5–8 slides)

Template

## Q[N] Review — [Team Name]

### TL;DR
3-sentence executive summary: what we achieved, what we missed, what's next.

### Scorecard
| Objective | Score | Highlights |
|-----------|-------|-----------|
| ... | 0.X | ... |
Overall: X.XX / 1.0

### Key Wins
- [Win with quantified impact]
- [Win with quantified impact]

### Key Misses
- [Miss with root cause and lesson learned]

### Delivery Metrics
| Metric | Q[N-1] | Q[N] | Trend |
|--------|--------|------|-------|
| Features shipped | ... | ... | |
| Incidents (P1/P2) | ... | ... | |
| Velocity (avg) | ... | ... | |

### Risks and Outlook
Active risks heading into next quarter.

### Next Quarter Preview
Top 3 themes or initiatives for Q[N+1].

Communicating to Different Audiences

Upward (Your Manager, VP, Exec)

  • Lead with impact: Business outcomes, metrics, customer impact
  • Be concise: 5 bullets, not 5 paragraphs
  • Surface risks: They want to know what might break, not just what's going well
  • Make asks explicit: Don't hint — state what you need clearly
  • Use their language: Revenue, retention, velocity-to-market — not story points or tech jargon

Lateral (Peer leads, PMs, adjacent teams)

  • Focus on dependencies: What you need from them, what they need from you
  • Share context: They don't have your team's full picture
  • Flag shared risks: Especially cross-team blockers
  • Be transparent about capacity: If you can't take on their request, say so clearly

Downward (Your Team)

  • Be transparent: Share company context, org decisions, reasons behind priorities
  • Celebrate wins: Public recognition in team channels
  • Be honest about challenges: Don't sugarcoat — the team knows when things are hard
  • Show how their work connects: "This feature directly supports the company OKR on retention"

Delivery Channel

| Update Type | Channel | Format | |-------------|---------|--------| | Weekly | Team chat (channel + manager DM) or email | Text with clear sections | | Monthly | Email + shared wiki page | Longer-form with tables | | Quarterly | Wiki doc + presentation | Document + slides for review meeting | | Ad hoc (incident, launch) | Chat + email | Brief, factual, with next steps |


Anti-Patterns

| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Better Approach | |-------------|---------|----------------| | Activity log | "Worked on X" tells nothing about progress | State outcomes: "Shipped X, reducing Y by Z%" | | No risks section | Signals unawareness or avoidance | Always include at least one risk or watch item | | Buried asks | Buries what you need in a wall of text | Surface asks in their own section at the top | | One-size-fits-all | Same update sent to execs and the team | Tailor format and depth by audience | | Inconsistent cadence | Updates come randomly, not on schedule | Pick a day, stick to it every week |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.