Audit Loop
Lightweight read-only audit. Use host-appropriate review coverage for evidence and findings. Iterate on disagreement or low confidence. No code changes.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-minghinmatthewlam-agent-guards-audit-loop ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-minghinmatthewlam-agent-guards-audit-loop) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Audit Loop
Read-only audit with review coverage appropriate to the current host. No code changes.
Planning before implementation → use plan-loop instead. Reviewing completed code changes → use review-loop instead.
Prerequisites
Read ~/dev/agent-guards/AGENTS.md before starting — the safety and workflow conventions that govern all agent work.
How It Works
- Investigate the question. Collect evidence (files, commands, source material).
- Review your findings per
references/review-protocol.md. Spin up all review agents in parallel using the host-specific coverage rules. Pre-warm any deferred tools only when the selected host path actually needs them. - Iterate if reviewers disagree, confidence is low, or key claims lack evidence.
- Write a final verdict: scope reviewed, evidence basis, findings, residual risks, next steps.
Every meaningful claim must cite specific files, commands, or source material.
Round Sizing
- Claude host:
- R1: 1 native + 1 Codex cross-model.
- R2+ only when triggered: confidence below 85, reviewer disagreement, or high-impact finding lacks evidence. Focus on previous round's findings and unresolved gaps — not a fresh re-review.
- Escalate to 3+1 for high-risk or persistent disagreement.
- Codex host:
- R1: 1-2 native reviewers only.
- R2+ only when triggered: confidence below 85, reviewer disagreement, or high-impact finding lacks evidence. Focus on previous round's findings and unresolved gaps — not a fresh re-review.
- Escalate to 3 native reviewers for high-risk or persistent disagreement.
Confidence
After each round, assess confidence 0-100 with top unknowns and what evidence is still missing:
- Below 85: consider another round.
- 85+: eligible to close.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: minghinmatthewlam
- Source: minghinmatthewlam/agent-guards
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.