Install
$ agentstack add skill-mmthebest-research-architect-research-architect-audit ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Research Architect Audit
Use this branch before declaring the first draft complete.
Inputs
Read all available artifacts under:
paper_output/
Especially:
project_config.json
exemplar_logic_profile.md
exemplar_adaptation_plan.md
confirmed_research_spine.md
study_design_brief.md
study_component_registry.md
evidence_bank.md
claim_register.md
evidence_display_map.md
citation_support_bank.md
section_blueprints.md
writing_rationale_matrix.md
first_draft/main.md
Use compatible legacy artifacts when the canonical file is absent.
Required outputs
Create:
paper_output/audit_report.md
paper_output/revision_queue.md
Audit gates
| Gate | Blocking Failure Examples | |---|---| | Target-reference logic | target paper summarized without extracting load-bearing research moves or strengths | | Adaptation validity | topic nouns changed while design assumptions, context, or evidence needs remain unexamined | | Research spine clarity | no bounded phenomenon/tension/question/contribution/scope | | Feasibility | claim depends on evidence, access, participants, sources, or warrants that are unavailable and unplanned | | Literature grounding | sources are listed without mapping concepts, theories, debates, methods, evidence standards, or gaps | | Design-family fit | validity criteria or manuscript logic come from an incompatible research tradition | | Study-design validity | selection, evidence generation, analysis, comparison/warrant, credibility, or inference boundary is missing | | Evidence traceability | central claims lack evidence IDs, citation IDs, locators, or explicit limitation language | | Evidence-display logic | display has no argument function, hides context, or states a stronger claim than the evidence permits | | Citation integrity | citation is invented, unverifiable, irrelevant, or used beyond its support | | Non-copying | wording, source-specific claims, data, display content, or rhetorical sequence is too close to the exemplar | | Draft completeness | the design family requires methods, positionality, source criticism, integration, counterargument, limitations, or findings that are absent | | Inference-boundary control | causal, prevalence, transfer, theoretical, normative, mechanistic, or policy claims exceed the available warrant |
Audit report schema
| Gate | Status | Evidence Checked | Problem Found | Required Fix | Upstream Owner | Severity | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Severity values:
BLOCKED: required before the draft can be used;MAJOR: weakens the central research logic or claim;MINOR: improves clarity, transparency, or presentation;PASS: no issue found.
Revision queue schema
| Priority | Fix | Affected Section | Required Upstream Artifact | Owner/Next Action | Verification Criterion | |---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rules
- Route structural failures to the artifact that owns the decision.
- Weak target-paper analysis returns to
research-architect-literature. - Superficial or infeasible adaptation returns to
research-architect-literatureorresearch-architect-brainstorm. - Weak design-family logic returns to
research-architect-design. - Weak evidence or claims return to
research-architect-evidence. - Weak citation support returns to
research-architect-citation. - Prose revision follows upstream correction.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mmTheBest
- Source: mmTheBest/Research-Architect
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.