AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ai Feature Prd

skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-ai-feature-prd · by mohitagw15856

Write a PRD for an AI-powered feature, covering the things normal PRDs miss. Use when asked to spec an AI/LLM feature, write a PRD for a feature that uses a model, or plan an AI capability (assistant, summarizer, generator, classifier). Produces an AI feature PRD — problem & UX of uncertainty, model approach, eval criteria, guardrails, fallback behaviour, the data flywheel, and cost/latency budge…

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-ai-feature-prd

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-ai-feature-prd)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ai Feature Prd? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

AI Feature PRD Skill

AI features break the normal PRD because the system is probabilistic: it will be wrong sometimes, and the product must be designed around that, not in denial of it. This skill extends a standard PRD with the AI-specific sections that decide whether the feature is trustworthy — the UX of uncertainty, the eval bar, guardrails, and what happens when the model is wrong.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • The user problem and why an AI/probabilistic approach fits it (vs. deterministic rules).
  • What "good" looks like to the user, and the cost of a wrong answer (low-stakes vs. high-stakes).
  • Inputs available — context/data the model can use; privacy constraints.
  • Trust level needed — can the user verify the output, or must it be near-perfect?

Reads from / Writes to the Brain

If a [professional-brain](../professional-brain/SKILL.md) exists, read context.md (product, users, voice) and knowledge/strategy.md first; write the feature to entities/ and any scoping decision to decisions/, each provenance-tagged.

Output Format

AI Feature PRD: [feature]

1. Problem & why AI — the user problem, and why a model (not rules) is the right tool. If rules would do, say so.

2. Experience — the core flow, and crucially the UX of uncertainty: how confidence is shown, how the user verifies/edits, and how errors are made cheap to recover from. AI features live or die here.

3. Model approach — prompt / fine-tune / RAG / agent (link [rag-design-doc](../rag-design-doc/SKILL.md) or [agent-spec](../agent-spec/SKILL.md)), the model tier, and why.

4. Quality bar & evaluation — the metrics and the explicit ship threshold; reference an [ai-eval-plan](../ai-eval-plan/SKILL.md). State the acceptable error rate given the stakes.

5. Guardrails & safety — what the feature must never do, input/output filtering, and handling of harmful/PII/out-of-scope inputs.

6. Fallback behaviour — what happens when the model is unsure, wrong, slow, or down: graceful degradation, "I'm not sure" states, human handoff. No silent confident errors.

7. Data flywheel — how usage (and the 👍/👎 / edits) feed back into evaluation and improvement, with the privacy boundary.

8. Cost & latency — the per-request budget and p95 target; reference an [llm-cost-latency-budget](../llm-cost-latency-budget/SKILL.md).

9. Rollout — staged exposure (internal → %→ GA), the guardrail metrics watched, and the rollback trigger.

Quality Checks

  • [ ] The PRD designs for the model being wrong — there's an explicit fallback, not just the happy path
  • [ ] The UX shows uncertainty and lets the user verify/correct cheaply
  • [ ] There's an explicit quality bar tied to the stakes (a medical answer and a tweet draft are not the same bar)
  • [ ] Guardrails name what the feature must never do
  • [ ] A data flywheel is defined with its privacy boundary
  • [ ] Cost and p95 latency budgets are stated, not left to "we'll see"

Anti-Patterns

  • [ ] Do not design only the happy path — a probabilistic feature without a fallback is a feature that fails loudly in production
  • [ ] Do not hide uncertainty behind a confident UI — overclaimed confidence is how AI features lose user trust permanently
  • [ ] Do not use AI where deterministic rules are better, cheaper, and more reliable — "AI" is not the goal
  • [ ] Do not set one quality bar for all stakes — calibrate the acceptable error rate to the cost of being wrong
  • [ ] Do not ship without a rollback trigger and guardrail metrics — a probabilistic system needs a kill switch

Based On

Standard PRD practice (see [prd-template](../prd-template/SKILL.md)) extended for probabilistic systems — uncertainty UX, eval gates, guardrails, and graceful fallback.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.