Install
$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-brag-doc ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Brag Doc Skill
Nobody remembers in December what they shipped in March — so good work goes uncredited at review time. A brag doc is the fix: a running, dated log of what you did and the impact it had, captured while it's fresh. This skill turns a pile of "stuff I did" into impact-first entries you can paste straight into a [self-review](../self-review/SKILL.md) or [promotion-packet](../promotion-packet/SKILL.md).
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- The win(s) — what you did (rough notes are fine; the skill structures them).
- Impact — the outcome and any metric (before → after, time saved, revenue, users) — even a rough one.
- Scope & role — your specific contribution vs. the team's, and who it affected.
- Date / period and any evidence (PR, doc, dashboard, kudos, ticket link).
Output Format
Brag Doc — [your name], [period]
Entries newest-first, grouped by theme (or quarter). Each entry is impact-first:
> [Verb-led headline — the outcome, not the task] · [date] > - What I did: [the specific action and your role in it] > - Impact: [metric / outcome — before → after where possible] > - Scope: [who/what it affected — team, org, customers] > - Evidence: [link] > - Maps to: [the competency / ladder level it demonstrates — e.g. "cross-team influence"]
Example:
> Cut onboarding drop-off 18% → 9%, unlocking ~$140k ARR · Mar 2026 > - What I did: led the redesign of the 3-step signup flow; wrote the PRD, drove eng + design alignment. > - Impact: activation 41% → 52%; drop-off halved (measured over 6 wks, 20k users). > - Scope: owned end-to-end; affected all new signups. > - Evidence: [PRD] · [dashboard] > - Maps to: drives measurable product outcomes; cross-functional leadership.
End with a "Themes this period" summary — the 3–4 narrative threads your wins ladder up to.
Quality Checks
- [ ] Every entry leads with impact/outcome, not the activity
- [ ] Metrics include the baseline (before → after), not a bare percentage
- [ ] Your specific contribution is distinguished from the team's
- [ ] Each entry links real evidence
- [ ] Entries are tagged to a competency/ladder level, so the doc feeds a review or promo case directly
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not log tasks ("attended planning", "wrote code") — log outcomes ("shipped X, which moved Y")
- [ ] Do not wait until review season — capture wins within a week, while the metrics and context are fresh
- [ ] Do not inflate or claim team wins as solo — overstated credit is worse than none when a manager checks
- [ ] Do not omit the metric because it's imperfect — a rough, labelled estimate beats "improved things"
- [ ] Do not bury the evidence — an unlinked claim is one a busy manager can't verify or champion
Based On
Brag-document practice (Julia Evans) and impact-first accomplishment tracking.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mohitagw15856
- Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.