AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Consulting Proposal

skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-consulting-proposal · by mohitagw15856

Write a consulting proposal that wins the engagement — outcomes over hours. Use when asked to write a consulting proposal, a project proposal, a pitch for a client engagement, or to respond to an RFP. Produces a proposal — the client's problem in their words, your approach & deliverables, outcomes/value, timeline & phases, investment with options, and why-you — framed around results, not a task l…

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-consulting-proposal

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-consulting-proposal)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Consulting Proposal? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Consulting Proposal Skill

Clients don't buy hours — they buy an outcome and the confidence you'll deliver it. Losing proposals lead with the consultant's process and a flat day-rate; winning ones lead with the client's problem and the value of solving it. This skill writes a proposal framed around results, with tiered options that anchor on value — ready to drop into the themed PDF export.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • The client & their problem — who they are, the pain, and (crucially) the cost of not solving it.
  • Your approach — how you'd solve it and the concrete deliverables.
  • Outcomes — the results the client gets, ideally quantified.
  • Commercials — your pricing model (fixed/retainer/value-based), timeline, and what's out of scope.

Output Format

Proposal: [engagement] for [client]

1. The problem (their words) — restate their situation and the cost of the status quo. Show you get it before you pitch. This earns the read.

2. Objectives & outcomes — what success looks like, in their metrics. Lead with the value, not the activity.

3. Approach & deliverables — the phases and the concrete artifacts they'll receive. Enough detail to build confidence, not a padded task list.

4. Timeline — phases with milestones and rough dates.

5. Investment — the price, framed against the value/cost-of-inaction. Offer 2–3 tiered options (e.g. core / recommended / comprehensive) — options shift the conversation from "yes/no" to "which," and anchor on the bigger one. State what's included per tier and what's out of scope.

6. Why me/us — relevant proof: comparable results, credentials, a short case reference. Brief.

7. Next step — one clear action to move forward (sign, a kickoff call, a deposit).

Quality Checks

  • [ ] Opens with the client's problem and the cost of inaction, not your bio/process
  • [ ] Framed around outcomes/value, not hours or a task list
  • [ ] Offers tiered options (anchors on value, gives a "which" not a "whether")
  • [ ] Scope and out-of-scope are explicit (prevents scope creep later)
  • [ ] Proof is specific and relevant, kept brief
  • [ ] Ends with one clear next step

Anti-Patterns

  • [ ] Do not lead with "About us / our methodology" — lead with their problem; they care about themselves
  • [ ] Do not sell hours/day-rate as the headline — price the outcome; hours invite haggling
  • [ ] Do not give a single take-it-or-leave-it price — tiered options win more and at higher value
  • [ ] Do not leave scope fuzzy — undefined scope is how fixed-price engagements bleed
  • [ ] Do not pad the deliverables list — confidence comes from clarity, not volume

Based On

Value-based consulting-proposal practice (Alan Weiss-style outcomes-over-hours, tiered options, anchor on value).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.