Install
$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-gdpr-compliance ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
GDPR Compliance Skill
GDPR compliance is mostly bookkeeping you can defend: knowing every place you process personal data, why you're allowed to, how long you keep it, and how a person can get it out or deleted. This skill builds that record (the ROPA), pins a lawful basis to each activity, and flags the high-risk processing that legally requires a DPIA — turning "are we GDPR-compliant?" into a documented, auditable answer.
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- Processing activities — what personal data you collect, why, and where it flows (this is the spine; everything hangs off it).
- Role — controller (you decide the why/how) or processor (you act on a controller's instructions); your obligations differ.
- Data subjects & data types — whose data, and whether any is special-category (health, biometrics, etc.) or about children.
- Transfers — any processing or storage outside the EEA (triggers transfer-mechanism requirements).
Output Format
GDPR Assessment: [company] ([controller/processor])
1. ROPA — the Record of Processing Activities (Art. 30); one row per activity:
| Activity | Purpose | Data categories | Subjects | Lawful basis | Recipients | Retention | Transfers | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2. Lawful basis — the chosen Art. 6 basis per activity (consent / contract / legal obligation / vital interests / public task / legitimate interests) and why. For special-category data, the additional Art. 9 condition. Don't default everything to "consent" — it's often the weakest, hardest-to-maintain basis.
3. DSAR workflow — how you handle access/erasure/portability/objection requests: intake, identity check, the one-month deadline, and how data is located and exported/deleted.
4. DPIA screen — flag activities that legally require a Data Protection Impact Assessment (large-scale special-category processing, systematic monitoring, profiling with legal effects).
5. Gaps — prioritised: missing lawful basis, no retention period, undocumented transfers, no DSAR process.
Programmatic Helper
scripts/ropa_check.py (stdlib only) validates a ROPA and scores completeness so gaps are found mechanically:
# ropa.json: [{"activity":"...","purpose":"...","lawful_basis":"contract","retention":"3y","recipients":["..."],"special_category":false,"large_scale":true}, ...]
python3 scripts/ropa_check.py ropa.json
python3 scripts/ropa_check.py ropa.json --json
It flags activities missing a lawful basis, purpose, or retention, and marks those that trigger a DPIA.
Quality Checks
- [ ] Every processing activity has a documented lawful basis and a retention period
- [ ] "Consent" isn't used as a lazy default where contract or legitimate interests genuinely apply
- [ ] Special-category data has its additional Art. 9 condition identified
- [ ] DPIA-triggering activities are flagged, not buried
- [ ] Cross-border transfers name a valid mechanism (adequacy, SCCs, etc.)
- [ ] The DSAR workflow names the one-month statutory deadline
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not default every activity to "consent" — it's revocable and high-maintenance; use the basis that actually fits
- [ ] Do not skip the ROPA — without the record of what you process, every other GDPR obligation is unanchored
- [ ] Do not store data with no retention period — "forever" is not a lawful retention policy
- [ ] Do not treat a DPIA as optional for high-risk processing — it's a legal requirement, not best practice
- [ ] Do not give legal advice as settled law — flag where a DPO or counsel must confirm (esp. lawful basis and transfers)
Based On
EU GDPR — Art. 6 (lawful basis), Art. 9 (special category), Art. 30 (ROPA), Art. 35 (DPIA), data-subject rights.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mohitagw15856
- Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.