Install
$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-investor-update ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Investor Update Skill
This skill writes a complete investor update — structured for clarity, honest about challenges, and specific about asks. Output follows the format preferred by most early-stage and growth investors.
Required Inputs
Ask the user for these if not provided:
- Company name and stage (Seed / Series A / Series B / etc.)
- Period covered (month or quarter)
- Key metrics this period (revenue, MRR, users, churn, burn, runway — whatever's relevant)
- Biggest wins
- Biggest challenges or misses
- Specific asks from investors (intros, advice, talent, partnerships)
- What's coming next period
- Tone (formal / conversational — most investors prefer conversational)
Output Structure
[Company Name] — [Month/Quarter] Update [Date]
Hi [Investor names or "all"],
[One or two sentence opener — a specific highlight or honest framing of the period. Don't open with "Hope you're well." Open with the most important thing that happened.]
The Numbers
| Metric | This Period | Last Period | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [MRR / ARR] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | | [Active users / customers] | | | | | [Churn rate] | | | | | [Burn rate] | | | | | [Runway] | | | | | [Other key metric] | | | |
[1–2 sentences of narrative on the numbers — what's the story behind the movement? Don't just repeat the table.]
Highlights
[Highlight 1 — 4–6 word title] [2–4 sentences. What happened. Why it matters. Be specific — name the customer, the number, the milestone.]
[Highlight 2] [2–4 sentences]
[Highlight 3 — optional]
Challenges
[This section is what separates trustworthy updates from self-promotional ones. Investors know you have challenges. Being direct builds trust.]
[Challenge 1] [2–4 sentences. What the problem is. What you've tried. What you're doing about it. Don't spin — investors see through it.]
[Challenge 2 — if applicable]
Focus for Next [Month/Quarter]
[3–5 bullet points. What you're concentrating on next period and why. Keep it tight — not an exhaustive roadmap.]
- [Priority 1]
- [Priority 2]
- [Priority 3]
Asks
[Be specific. "Let me know if you can help" is not an ask. These should be actionable items an investor can act on immediately.]
- [Ask type: e.g. Intro] — [Specific request. e.g. "Looking for an intro to procurement leads at mid-market SaaS companies. Happy to share a warm intro note."]
- [Ask type: e.g. Advice] — [Specific question you want input on]
- [Ask type: e.g. Talent] — [Specific hire you're looking for — title, key requirements]
[Closing line — 1 sentence. Forward-looking or a genuine thanks. Not "as always, let me know if you have questions."]
[Signature] [Name] [Company] [One way to reply — email / Calendly / reply to this thread]
Writing Rules
- Updates should take an investor 3–4 minutes to read. If it's longer, trim it.
- Never lead with process ("This month we focused on...") — lead with outcomes
- Challenges section must be honest. A missing challenges section signals the founder isn't self-aware or isn't being transparent.
- Metrics table must include comparison to last period — a number without context is meaningless
- Asks must be specific enough that an investor knows within 5 seconds if they can help
- No jargon or buzzwords ("synergies," "crushing it," "hockey stick") — plain language only
Quality Checks
- [ ] Opens with a specific highlight or honest framing (not a pleasantry)
- [ ] Numbers include period-over-period comparison
- [ ] Challenges section is present and honest
- [ ] Asks are specific and actionable
- [ ] Total length is skimmable in 3–4 minutes
- [ ] No spin or buzzwords
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not omit challenges or bad news — sanitised updates erode investor trust faster than bad results do
- [ ] Do not bury the lead — use BLUF structure and put the most important news in the first paragraph
- [ ] Do not send an update without a clear "Ask" section — investors who want to help need to know how
- [ ] Do not use buzzwords or spin — investors see hundreds of updates and will see through vague positive language
- [ ] Do not report metrics without a comparison baseline — numbers without context (vs. last period or target) are meaningless
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Write an investor update for [month/quarter]"
- "Draft a monthly update for our investors based on these notes: [paste notes]"
- "Help me write a board update for Q[N]"
- "Write our Series A investor newsletter"
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mohitagw15856
- Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.