Install
$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-iso-27001-isms ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
ISO 27001 ISMS Skill
ISO 27001 certifies a system (the ISMS), not a checklist — auditors check that you scoped it, assessed risk, and can justify which Annex A controls you applied or excluded (the Statement of Applicability). This skill builds that backbone: scope, risk treatment, and a defensible SoA, so certification is a documented management system rather than a scramble.
Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- ISMS scope — the products, locations, and information assets in scope (and what's deliberately out).
- Context & interested parties — the business, its regulatory/customer security obligations, and key risks.
- Risk approach — how you identify, assess, and treat information-security risk (the SoA flows from the risk assessment, not the other way round).
- Current controls — what's already implemented across the Annex A domains.
Output Format
ISO 27001 ISMS: [organisation]
1. Scope statement — the boundary of the ISMS: assets, locations, exclusions and why.
2. Context & risk — interested parties and their requirements; the risk assessment method and risk acceptance criteria.
3. Statement of Applicability (SoA) — the heart of it: each Annex A control, applicable or not, status, and justification:
| Annex A control | Applicable? | Status | Justification | |---|---|---|---| | A.5 Access control policy | Yes | met | Required for customer data | | A.8 Teleworking | No | n/a | No remote-access to in-scope systems — excluded with rationale |
(Excluding a control is fine — excluding it without a justification is an audit finding.)
4. Risk treatment plan — the top risks, the treatment (mitigate/accept/transfer/avoid), and the controls that address each.
5. Implementation roadmap — prioritised: mandatory clauses 4–10 (management system) first, then the highest-risk Annex A gaps, with owners and dates.
Programmatic Helper
scripts/soa_coverage.py (stdlib only) scores SoA coverage and flags controls excluded without a justification (the classic finding):
# soa.json: [{"control":"A.5.1","applicable":true,"status":"met|partial|gap","justification":"..."}, ...]
python3 scripts/soa_coverage.py soa.json
python3 scripts/soa_coverage.py soa.json --json
Quality Checks
- [ ] The ISMS scope is explicit, including deliberate exclusions
- [ ] The SoA covers every Annex A control with an applicable/excluded decision
- [ ] Every excluded control carries a justification (the most common audit finding)
- [ ] The SoA traces to the risk assessment — controls exist to treat identified risks, not for show
- [ ] Mandatory management-system clauses (4–10) are addressed, not just the Annex A controls
Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not exclude a control without a written justification — silent exclusions are audit findings
- [ ] Do not build the SoA before the risk assessment — applicability is derived from risk, not guessed
- [ ] Do not treat Annex A as the whole standard — clauses 4–10 (the management system) are mandatory and where many fail
- [ ] Do not mark controls "implemented" without evidence of operation — certification audits sample evidence
- [ ] Do not present this as certification — only an accredited body certifies; this prepares the ISMS
Based On
ISO/IEC 27001 (ISMS clauses 4–10) and Annex A control set + the Statement of Applicability requirement.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mohitagw15856
- Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.