AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Iso 27001 Isms

skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-iso-27001-isms · by mohitagw15856

Scope an ISO 27001 ISMS and build the Statement of Applicability across Annex A controls. Use when asked to implement ISO 27001, scope an ISMS, build a Statement of Applicability (SoA), or prepare for ISO 27001 certification. Produces an ISMS plan — scope & context, risk-treatment approach, an Annex A control applicability table (the SoA), and a prioritised implementation roadmap.

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-iso-27001-isms

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mohitagw15856-pm-claude-skills-iso-27001-isms)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Iso 27001 Isms? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

ISO 27001 ISMS Skill

ISO 27001 certifies a system (the ISMS), not a checklist — auditors check that you scoped it, assessed risk, and can justify which Annex A controls you applied or excluded (the Statement of Applicability). This skill builds that backbone: scope, risk treatment, and a defensible SoA, so certification is a documented management system rather than a scramble.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • ISMS scope — the products, locations, and information assets in scope (and what's deliberately out).
  • Context & interested parties — the business, its regulatory/customer security obligations, and key risks.
  • Risk approach — how you identify, assess, and treat information-security risk (the SoA flows from the risk assessment, not the other way round).
  • Current controls — what's already implemented across the Annex A domains.

Output Format

ISO 27001 ISMS: [organisation]

1. Scope statement — the boundary of the ISMS: assets, locations, exclusions and why.

2. Context & risk — interested parties and their requirements; the risk assessment method and risk acceptance criteria.

3. Statement of Applicability (SoA) — the heart of it: each Annex A control, applicable or not, status, and justification:

| Annex A control | Applicable? | Status | Justification | |---|---|---|---| | A.5 Access control policy | Yes | met | Required for customer data | | A.8 Teleworking | No | n/a | No remote-access to in-scope systems — excluded with rationale |

(Excluding a control is fine — excluding it without a justification is an audit finding.)

4. Risk treatment plan — the top risks, the treatment (mitigate/accept/transfer/avoid), and the controls that address each.

5. Implementation roadmap — prioritised: mandatory clauses 4–10 (management system) first, then the highest-risk Annex A gaps, with owners and dates.

Programmatic Helper

scripts/soa_coverage.py (stdlib only) scores SoA coverage and flags controls excluded without a justification (the classic finding):

# soa.json: [{"control":"A.5.1","applicable":true,"status":"met|partial|gap","justification":"..."}, ...]
python3 scripts/soa_coverage.py soa.json
python3 scripts/soa_coverage.py soa.json --json

Quality Checks

  • [ ] The ISMS scope is explicit, including deliberate exclusions
  • [ ] The SoA covers every Annex A control with an applicable/excluded decision
  • [ ] Every excluded control carries a justification (the most common audit finding)
  • [ ] The SoA traces to the risk assessment — controls exist to treat identified risks, not for show
  • [ ] Mandatory management-system clauses (4–10) are addressed, not just the Annex A controls

Anti-Patterns

  • [ ] Do not exclude a control without a written justification — silent exclusions are audit findings
  • [ ] Do not build the SoA before the risk assessment — applicability is derived from risk, not guessed
  • [ ] Do not treat Annex A as the whole standard — clauses 4–10 (the management system) are mandatory and where many fail
  • [ ] Do not mark controls "implemented" without evidence of operation — certification audits sample evidence
  • [ ] Do not present this as certification — only an accredited body certifies; this prepares the ISMS

Based On

ISO/IEC 27001 (ISMS clauses 4–10) and Annex A control set + the Statement of Applicability requirement.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.