AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Competitive Intelligence

skill-momentumfurkan-claude-competitive-intel-claude-competitive-intel · by momentumfurkan

|

No reviews yet
0 installs
31 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-momentumfurkan-claude-competitive-intel-claude-competitive-intel

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-momentumfurkan-claude-competitive-intel-claude-competitive-intel)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
6mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Competitive Intelligence? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Competitive Intelligence Pipeline

You are running a comprehensive competitive intelligence pipeline. This skill turns any business idea into a complete market analysis with professional deliverables.

Overview

When triggered, you will guide the user's business idea through a 9-step pipeline, producing:

  1. Strategy DOCX — Feature matrix, gap analysis, AI opportunities, target segments, marketing strategy
  2. Pricing DOCX — Competitor pricing comparison, package recommendations, revenue projections
  3. Tech Stack Report HTML — Competitor technologies, recommended libraries/packages, GitHub repos
  4. Multi-sheet Excel — All data in structured, color-coded spreadsheets (10+ sheets)
  5. Complaints HTML — Competitor weaknesses and strategic opportunities
  6. Brand Suggestions HTML — 30 name ideas + color palettes based on competitor gap
  7. Master Dashboard HTML — Interactive report combining ALL analysis (15+ sections)

All files go into a dedicated folder the user can browse.

IMPORTANT: Setup

Before starting, install required packages:

npm install docx --prefix /sessions/laughing-keen-darwin/.npm-global 2>/dev/null
pip install openpyxl --break-system-packages 2>/dev/null

Set NODE_PATH for all Node.js commands:

NODE_PATH=/sessions/laughing-keen-darwin/.npm-global/lib/node_modules node script.js

Step 0: Understand the Idea

First, deeply understand what the user is building:

  • If they provide source code or a project folder, READ IT. Analyze the tech stack, features, modules, screens.
  • If they provide a description, expand it: what features would this product have? What category is it in?
  • Ask clarifying questions ONLY if the idea is truly ambiguous. If you have enough to work with, proceed.

Output a brief summary: "Here's what I understand about your product: [summary]. Let me start the competitive analysis."

Step 1: Competitor Discovery

Use web search to find competitors. Categorize them:

  • Direct competitors — Same target market, similar feature set
  • Partial competitors — Overlap in some features but different focus
  • Adjacent competitors — Related market, could expand into your space
  • Local competitors — If the idea targets a specific country/region

Rules:

  • Find up to 20 competitors (if more exist, pick the top 20 by market presence)
  • For each competitor, research: name, website, category, founding year, estimated users, estimated revenue, pricing tiers
  • Search for social media presence: Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook
  • Note follower counts and content frequency

Save this data mentally — you'll use it across ALL subsequent steps.

Step 2: Feature Matrix

Build a comprehensive feature comparison matrix:

  1. List ALL features from ALL competitors + the user's product
  2. Group features into 6-10 categories
  3. Rate each: "Tam" (full), "Kismi" (partial), "Yok" (none)
  4. Calculate coverage scores for each competitor
  5. Identify features that are UNIQUE to the user's product (USP)
  6. Identify features competitors have that the user's product lacks (Gaps)

This becomes the foundation for everything else.

Step 3: Gap Analysis & AI Opportunities

From the feature matrix:

Gap Analysis:

  • List USP features (user has, no competitor has)
  • List features to add (competitors have, user doesn't), with priority (High/Medium/Low) and difficulty

AI/Automation Opportunities:

  • For each module/feature area, identify where AI agents or automation could add value
  • Map to 3 phases: Short-term (0-3 months), Mid-term (3-6 months), Long-term (6-12 months)
  • Rate impact: High/Medium/Low

Step 4: Target Market & Segments

Based on competitor analysis, identify 4-8 target customer segments:

  • Segment name, market size estimate, main pain point, acquisition channels, price sensitivity, priority level

Step 5: Pricing Strategy

Research competitor pricing in detail:

  • All pricing tiers, per-user vs flat vs org pricing, AI add-on costs, minimum seats
  • Calculate the "total SaaS cost" a user would pay for equivalent functionality using separate tools
  • Recommend 3-tier pricing (Free/Pro/Business) + optional Team add-on
  • If relevant, add local pricing (PPP-adjusted for the target country)
  • Build a 24-month revenue projection with conservative assumptions

Step 6: Competitor Complaints & Weaknesses

Search for complaints about each competitor:

  • Trustpilot, G2, Capterra, Reddit, Twitter, forums
  • Categorize by type: Performance, Pricing, UX, Support, Bugs, Missing Features, etc.
  • Rate severity 1-5 per category per competitor
  • Build a heatmap showing complaint density
  • Map each weakness to a strategic opportunity for the user's product

Step 7: Brand & Visual Analysis

Analyze competitor brand colors and visual identity:

  • Extract primary color palettes for each competitor
  • Identify color "gaps" (colors not heavily used by competitors)
  • Generate 30 name suggestions with rationale
  • For each name, suggest a 5-color palette that differentiates from competitors

Step 8: Tech Stack & Library Analysis

This step analyzes what technologies competitors use, and recommends libraries/packages/GitHub repos for the user's project based on the detected tech stack.

8.1: Detect User's Tech Stack

From Step 0, you already know what the user is building. Identify:

  • Language/Framework: Flutter/Dart, React/Next.js, Vue/Nuxt, Angular, Swift, Kotlin, Python/Django, Ruby/Rails, etc.
  • Backend: Supabase, Firebase, AWS, Node.js, Go, etc.
  • State Management: Riverpod, Redux, Vuex, BLoC, etc.
  • Database: PostgreSQL, MongoDB, SQLite, etc.
  • Other: CI/CD, testing frameworks, design systems

8.2: Research Competitor Tech Stacks

For each competitor, research what technologies they use. Search for:

  • "[competitor]" tech stack or "[competitor]" built with
  • "[competitor]" engineering blog
  • site:stackshare.io "[competitor]" — StackShare profiles
  • site:builtwith.com "[competitor]" — BuiltWith reports
  • "[competitor]" github — open source repos, SDKs
  • Job postings (they reveal tech stack): "[competitor]" careers engineer

For each competitor, document:

  • Frontend: Framework, UI library, language
  • Backend: Language, framework, cloud provider
  • Database: Primary DB, caching
  • AI/ML: Models, providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
  • Mobile: Native, React Native, Flutter, etc.
  • UI Kit / Design System: What component library or design system they use
  • Infrastructure: AWS/GCP/Azure, Kubernetes, etc.
  • Notable open-source: Any OSS projects they maintain

8.2b: Research Competitor UI Kits & Design Systems

This is critical — understanding what UI kits competitors use reveals their design quality, consistency, and development speed. For each competitor:

Search patterns:

  • "[competitor]" design system or "[competitor]" UI kit
  • "[competitor]" component library or "[competitor]" storybook
  • site:dribbble.com "[competitor]" — design showcases
  • site:figma.com "[competitor]" — Figma community files
  • "[competitor]" figma OR sketch OR design tokens
  • View competitor's website/app source for CSS framework clues (Tailwind classes, Material UI, etc.)
  • Check competitor's GitHub for design system repos: github.com/[company] design-system

For each competitor, identify:

  • Component Library: Material Design, Ant Design, Chakra UI, shadcn/ui, custom, etc.
  • CSS Framework: Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap, styled-components, CSS Modules, etc.
  • Design System: Whether they have a public design system, Storybook, Figma kit
  • Icon Set: Lucide, Heroicons, Material Icons, custom icons, etc.
  • Typography: Inter, SF Pro, Roboto, custom fonts
  • Color System: Material 3, custom tokens, CSS variables approach
  • Dark Mode: Supported or not
  • Motion/Animation: Framer Motion, Lottie, CSS animations, Rive
  • Accessibility: WCAG compliance level if detectable

8.3: Recommend Libraries & Packages

Based on the user's tech stack, research and recommend packages across these categories:

For the detected framework (e.g., Flutter):

Search patterns:

  • best [framework] packages for [feature] 2025 2026
  • [framework] [feature] library github stars
  • awesome-[framework] github — curated lists
  • pub.dev / npm / pypi / crates.io top packages for [feature]

Categories to cover:

  1. Core Architecture — State management, routing, DI, networking
  2. UI Kit / Component Library — Complete design system packages (THE MOST IMPORTANT CATEGORY — see 8.3b below)
  3. UI Primitives — Buttons, inputs, dialogs, bottom sheets, navigation components
  4. Charts & Data Viz — Chart libraries, graphs, dashboards, heatmaps
  5. Animation & Motion — Transition libraries, Lottie, Rive, micro-interactions
  6. Forms & Validation — Form builders, input masks, validators
  7. Icons & Assets — Icon packs, SVG libraries, illustration sets
  8. Data & Storage — Local DB, caching, sync, encryption
  9. Auth & Security — Authentication, authorization, encryption
  10. AI & ML — LLM integration, on-device ML, NLP
  11. Media — Image processing, camera, file picker, PDF generation
  12. Communication — Push notifications, WebSocket, email, chat
  13. Analytics & Monitoring — Crash reporting, analytics, logging
  14. Payment & Finance — Payment gateways, invoicing, currency
  15. Social Media — API SDKs, sharing, deep linking
  16. Testing — Unit, widget/component, integration, E2E
  17. DevOps — CI/CD, code generation, linting

For EACH recommended library, document:

  • Name and package registry link (pub.dev, npm, pypi, etc.)
  • GitHub URL and star count
  • Weekly downloads or popularity metric
  • Description — what it does and why it's relevant
  • Maturity — Stable / Beta / Experimental
  • License — MIT, Apache, BSD, etc.
  • Recommendation level — Essential / Recommended / Optional
  • Which competitors use it (if known)

Also search for:

  • GitHub template repos / starter kits for the tech stack
  • Boilerplate projects that combine multiple recommended packages
  • Open-source competitors or similar projects on GitHub

8.3b: Recommend UI Kits & Design Systems

This is the MOST IMPORTANT library category. Based on competitor UI kit research from 8.2b and the user's tech stack, recommend complete design system packages.

Search patterns:

  • best [framework] UI kit 2025 2026
  • [framework] component library comparison
  • [framework] design system production ready
  • [framework] material design OR cupertino OR custom design system
  • awesome-[framework] UI — curated lists

Framework-specific UI Kit recommendations:

Flutter/Dart:

  • Material 3 (built-in) — Google's official design system
  • flutteradaptivescaffold — Responsive layouts
  • Widgetbook — Component catalog / Storybook equivalent
  • Forui — Fork of shadcn/ui for Flutter
  • Flutter Acrylic / glassmorphism — Modern glass effects
  • Fluent UI (fluent_ui) — Microsoft's Fluent design for Flutter
  • MacOS UI (macos_ui) — macOS-native look
  • Shadcn Flutter (shadcn_flutter) — shadcn/ui port for Flutter
  • GetWidget — 1000+ pre-built widgets
  • VelocityX — Minimalist utility framework

React/Next.js:

  • shadcn/ui — Copy-paste Radix+Tailwind components (55K+ stars)
  • Radix UI — Headless accessible primitives (14K+ stars)
  • MUI (Material UI) — Google Material (90K+ stars)
  • Ant Design — Enterprise-grade (90K+ stars)
  • Chakra UI — Accessible component library (36K+ stars)
  • Mantine — Full-featured with hooks (24K+ stars)
  • NextUI — Beautiful, modern (19K+ stars)
  • Tremor — Dashboard components (15K+ stars)
  • Park UI — Ark UI + design tokens
  • Catalyst — Tailwind Labs official UI kit

Vue/Nuxt:

  • Vuetify — Material Design (39K+ stars)
  • PrimeVue — Rich enterprise suite (7K+ stars)
  • Nuxt UI — Official Nuxt components (3K+ stars)
  • Naive UI — Comprehensive Vue 3 (15K+ stars)
  • Element Plus — Element for Vue 3 (23K+ stars)
  • Headless UI — Tailwind Labs headless (24K+ stars)

For EACH recommended UI kit, document:

  • Name and package registry link
  • GitHub URL and star count
  • Weekly downloads or popularity metric
  • Component count — How many components included
  • Theming — CSS variables, design tokens, theme builder
  • Dark mode — Built-in support or manual
  • Accessibility — WCAG level, ARIA support
  • Figma kit — Available or not
  • Storybook — Available or not
  • Bundle size — Tree-shakeable, total size
  • Maturity — Stable / Beta / Experimental
  • License — MIT, Apache, etc.
  • Recommendation level — Essential / Recommended / Optional
  • Comparison note — How it compares to what competitors use

8.4: Build Tech Stack Comparison Table

Create a comparison showing:

| Technology Area | User's Product | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | ... | |---|---|---|---|---| | Frontend | Flutter 3.x | React | Vue.js | ... | | Backend | Supabase | Custom Node.js | Django | ... | | AI Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI + Custom | Anthropic | ... |

8.5: Generate Tech Stack Report

Produce a Tech Stack Report HTML containing:

  • Competitor tech stack cards (what each competitor uses)
  • Tech stack comparison table
  • Recommended library cards grouped by category, with:
  • Package name, description, GitHub stars, downloads
  • Color-coded recommendation level (Essential=green, Recommended=blue, Optional=gray)
  • Links to GitHub and package registry
  • Installation commands (copy-pasteable)
  • GitHub repos & starter kits section
  • Architecture diagram suggestion based on recommended stack

Also add 3 new sheets to the Excel workbook:

  • "Rakip Teknolojiler" (Competitor Technologies) — tech stack per competitor
  • "Kutuphane Onerileri" (Library Recommendations) — all recommended packages with details
  • "UI Kit Karsilastirma" (UI Kit Comparison) — competitor UI kits vs recommended UI kits with component count, theming, dark mode, accessibility, Figma kit, Storybook, bundle size

Step 9: Generate All Deliverables

Now produce all the files. Read the generation scripts from this skill's scripts/ directory:

File Generation Order:

  1. Create output folder:

`` mkdir -p "[OUTPUT_DIR]/[ProductName]_Competitive_Analysis" ``

  1. Generate Strategy DOCX — Read and customize scripts/generate_strategy_docx.js
  • Populate with YOUR researched data (features, competitors, gaps, AI opportunities, segments, marketing)
  • Run with NODE_PATH set
  1. Generate Pricing DOCX — Read and customize scripts/generate_pricing_docx.js
  • Populate with YOUR pricing data, packages, Turkey/local pricing, revenue projections
  1. Generate Excel workbook — Read and customize scripts/generate_excel.py
  • Creates 10+ sheets: Feature Matrix, AI Opportunities, Target Segments, Gap Analysis, Competitor Pricing, Package Details, Local Pricing, Revenue Projection, Competitor Technologies, Library Recommendations
  1. Generate Tech Stack Report HTML — Build a self-contained HTML file with:
  • Competitor tech stack cards
  • Tech stack comparison table
  • Recommended library cards (grouped by category, with GitHub stars, links, install commands)
  • Architecture suggestion section
  1. Generate Complaints HTML — Build a self-contained HTML file with:
  • Complaint cards per competitor with severity badges
  • Heatmap table (complaint categories × competitors)
  • Strategy cards showing how to exploit each weakness
  1. Generate Brand Suggestions HTML — Build an HTML file with:
  • Competitor color swatches
  • Color gap analysis
  • 30 name cards with color palettes
  1. Generate Master Dashboard HTML — The crown jewel. A single interactive HTML file with:
  • Dark theme (use emerald/green as default, or match user's brand)
  • Fixed navigation with section links
  • Hero with key stats (competitor count, feature count, AI

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.