Install
$ agentstack add skill-momentumfurkan-claude-competitive-intel-claude-competitive-intel ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ● Network access Used
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Competitive Intelligence Pipeline
You are running a comprehensive competitive intelligence pipeline. This skill turns any business idea into a complete market analysis with professional deliverables.
Overview
When triggered, you will guide the user's business idea through a 9-step pipeline, producing:
- Strategy DOCX — Feature matrix, gap analysis, AI opportunities, target segments, marketing strategy
- Pricing DOCX — Competitor pricing comparison, package recommendations, revenue projections
- Tech Stack Report HTML — Competitor technologies, recommended libraries/packages, GitHub repos
- Multi-sheet Excel — All data in structured, color-coded spreadsheets (10+ sheets)
- Complaints HTML — Competitor weaknesses and strategic opportunities
- Brand Suggestions HTML — 30 name ideas + color palettes based on competitor gap
- Master Dashboard HTML — Interactive report combining ALL analysis (15+ sections)
All files go into a dedicated folder the user can browse.
IMPORTANT: Setup
Before starting, install required packages:
npm install docx --prefix /sessions/laughing-keen-darwin/.npm-global 2>/dev/null
pip install openpyxl --break-system-packages 2>/dev/null
Set NODE_PATH for all Node.js commands:
NODE_PATH=/sessions/laughing-keen-darwin/.npm-global/lib/node_modules node script.js
Step 0: Understand the Idea
First, deeply understand what the user is building:
- If they provide source code or a project folder, READ IT. Analyze the tech stack, features, modules, screens.
- If they provide a description, expand it: what features would this product have? What category is it in?
- Ask clarifying questions ONLY if the idea is truly ambiguous. If you have enough to work with, proceed.
Output a brief summary: "Here's what I understand about your product: [summary]. Let me start the competitive analysis."
Step 1: Competitor Discovery
Use web search to find competitors. Categorize them:
- Direct competitors — Same target market, similar feature set
- Partial competitors — Overlap in some features but different focus
- Adjacent competitors — Related market, could expand into your space
- Local competitors — If the idea targets a specific country/region
Rules:
- Find up to 20 competitors (if more exist, pick the top 20 by market presence)
- For each competitor, research: name, website, category, founding year, estimated users, estimated revenue, pricing tiers
- Search for social media presence: Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook
- Note follower counts and content frequency
Save this data mentally — you'll use it across ALL subsequent steps.
Step 2: Feature Matrix
Build a comprehensive feature comparison matrix:
- List ALL features from ALL competitors + the user's product
- Group features into 6-10 categories
- Rate each: "Tam" (full), "Kismi" (partial), "Yok" (none)
- Calculate coverage scores for each competitor
- Identify features that are UNIQUE to the user's product (USP)
- Identify features competitors have that the user's product lacks (Gaps)
This becomes the foundation for everything else.
Step 3: Gap Analysis & AI Opportunities
From the feature matrix:
Gap Analysis:
- List USP features (user has, no competitor has)
- List features to add (competitors have, user doesn't), with priority (High/Medium/Low) and difficulty
AI/Automation Opportunities:
- For each module/feature area, identify where AI agents or automation could add value
- Map to 3 phases: Short-term (0-3 months), Mid-term (3-6 months), Long-term (6-12 months)
- Rate impact: High/Medium/Low
Step 4: Target Market & Segments
Based on competitor analysis, identify 4-8 target customer segments:
- Segment name, market size estimate, main pain point, acquisition channels, price sensitivity, priority level
Step 5: Pricing Strategy
Research competitor pricing in detail:
- All pricing tiers, per-user vs flat vs org pricing, AI add-on costs, minimum seats
- Calculate the "total SaaS cost" a user would pay for equivalent functionality using separate tools
- Recommend 3-tier pricing (Free/Pro/Business) + optional Team add-on
- If relevant, add local pricing (PPP-adjusted for the target country)
- Build a 24-month revenue projection with conservative assumptions
Step 6: Competitor Complaints & Weaknesses
Search for complaints about each competitor:
- Trustpilot, G2, Capterra, Reddit, Twitter, forums
- Categorize by type: Performance, Pricing, UX, Support, Bugs, Missing Features, etc.
- Rate severity 1-5 per category per competitor
- Build a heatmap showing complaint density
- Map each weakness to a strategic opportunity for the user's product
Step 7: Brand & Visual Analysis
Analyze competitor brand colors and visual identity:
- Extract primary color palettes for each competitor
- Identify color "gaps" (colors not heavily used by competitors)
- Generate 30 name suggestions with rationale
- For each name, suggest a 5-color palette that differentiates from competitors
Step 8: Tech Stack & Library Analysis
This step analyzes what technologies competitors use, and recommends libraries/packages/GitHub repos for the user's project based on the detected tech stack.
8.1: Detect User's Tech Stack
From Step 0, you already know what the user is building. Identify:
- Language/Framework: Flutter/Dart, React/Next.js, Vue/Nuxt, Angular, Swift, Kotlin, Python/Django, Ruby/Rails, etc.
- Backend: Supabase, Firebase, AWS, Node.js, Go, etc.
- State Management: Riverpod, Redux, Vuex, BLoC, etc.
- Database: PostgreSQL, MongoDB, SQLite, etc.
- Other: CI/CD, testing frameworks, design systems
8.2: Research Competitor Tech Stacks
For each competitor, research what technologies they use. Search for:
"[competitor]" tech stackor"[competitor]" built with"[competitor]" engineering blogsite:stackshare.io "[competitor]"— StackShare profilessite:builtwith.com "[competitor]"— BuiltWith reports"[competitor]" github— open source repos, SDKs- Job postings (they reveal tech stack):
"[competitor]" careers engineer
For each competitor, document:
- Frontend: Framework, UI library, language
- Backend: Language, framework, cloud provider
- Database: Primary DB, caching
- AI/ML: Models, providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
- Mobile: Native, React Native, Flutter, etc.
- UI Kit / Design System: What component library or design system they use
- Infrastructure: AWS/GCP/Azure, Kubernetes, etc.
- Notable open-source: Any OSS projects they maintain
8.2b: Research Competitor UI Kits & Design Systems
This is critical — understanding what UI kits competitors use reveals their design quality, consistency, and development speed. For each competitor:
Search patterns:
"[competitor]" design systemor"[competitor]" UI kit"[competitor]" component libraryor"[competitor]" storybooksite:dribbble.com "[competitor]"— design showcasessite:figma.com "[competitor]"— Figma community files"[competitor]" figma OR sketch OR design tokens- View competitor's website/app source for CSS framework clues (Tailwind classes, Material UI, etc.)
- Check competitor's GitHub for design system repos:
github.com/[company] design-system
For each competitor, identify:
- Component Library: Material Design, Ant Design, Chakra UI, shadcn/ui, custom, etc.
- CSS Framework: Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap, styled-components, CSS Modules, etc.
- Design System: Whether they have a public design system, Storybook, Figma kit
- Icon Set: Lucide, Heroicons, Material Icons, custom icons, etc.
- Typography: Inter, SF Pro, Roboto, custom fonts
- Color System: Material 3, custom tokens, CSS variables approach
- Dark Mode: Supported or not
- Motion/Animation: Framer Motion, Lottie, CSS animations, Rive
- Accessibility: WCAG compliance level if detectable
8.3: Recommend Libraries & Packages
Based on the user's tech stack, research and recommend packages across these categories:
For the detected framework (e.g., Flutter):
Search patterns:
best [framework] packages for [feature] 2025 2026[framework] [feature] library github starsawesome-[framework] github— curated listspub.dev/npm/pypi/crates.iotop packages for [feature]
Categories to cover:
- Core Architecture — State management, routing, DI, networking
- UI Kit / Component Library — Complete design system packages (THE MOST IMPORTANT CATEGORY — see 8.3b below)
- UI Primitives — Buttons, inputs, dialogs, bottom sheets, navigation components
- Charts & Data Viz — Chart libraries, graphs, dashboards, heatmaps
- Animation & Motion — Transition libraries, Lottie, Rive, micro-interactions
- Forms & Validation — Form builders, input masks, validators
- Icons & Assets — Icon packs, SVG libraries, illustration sets
- Data & Storage — Local DB, caching, sync, encryption
- Auth & Security — Authentication, authorization, encryption
- AI & ML — LLM integration, on-device ML, NLP
- Media — Image processing, camera, file picker, PDF generation
- Communication — Push notifications, WebSocket, email, chat
- Analytics & Monitoring — Crash reporting, analytics, logging
- Payment & Finance — Payment gateways, invoicing, currency
- Social Media — API SDKs, sharing, deep linking
- Testing — Unit, widget/component, integration, E2E
- DevOps — CI/CD, code generation, linting
For EACH recommended library, document:
- Name and package registry link (pub.dev, npm, pypi, etc.)
- GitHub URL and star count
- Weekly downloads or popularity metric
- Description — what it does and why it's relevant
- Maturity — Stable / Beta / Experimental
- License — MIT, Apache, BSD, etc.
- Recommendation level — Essential / Recommended / Optional
- Which competitors use it (if known)
Also search for:
- GitHub template repos / starter kits for the tech stack
- Boilerplate projects that combine multiple recommended packages
- Open-source competitors or similar projects on GitHub
8.3b: Recommend UI Kits & Design Systems
This is the MOST IMPORTANT library category. Based on competitor UI kit research from 8.2b and the user's tech stack, recommend complete design system packages.
Search patterns:
best [framework] UI kit 2025 2026[framework] component library comparison[framework] design system production ready[framework] material design OR cupertino OR custom design systemawesome-[framework] UI— curated lists
Framework-specific UI Kit recommendations:
Flutter/Dart:
- Material 3 (built-in) — Google's official design system
- flutteradaptivescaffold — Responsive layouts
- Widgetbook — Component catalog / Storybook equivalent
- Forui — Fork of shadcn/ui for Flutter
- Flutter Acrylic / glassmorphism — Modern glass effects
- Fluent UI (fluent_ui) — Microsoft's Fluent design for Flutter
- MacOS UI (macos_ui) — macOS-native look
- Shadcn Flutter (shadcn_flutter) — shadcn/ui port for Flutter
- GetWidget — 1000+ pre-built widgets
- VelocityX — Minimalist utility framework
React/Next.js:
- shadcn/ui — Copy-paste Radix+Tailwind components (55K+ stars)
- Radix UI — Headless accessible primitives (14K+ stars)
- MUI (Material UI) — Google Material (90K+ stars)
- Ant Design — Enterprise-grade (90K+ stars)
- Chakra UI — Accessible component library (36K+ stars)
- Mantine — Full-featured with hooks (24K+ stars)
- NextUI — Beautiful, modern (19K+ stars)
- Tremor — Dashboard components (15K+ stars)
- Park UI — Ark UI + design tokens
- Catalyst — Tailwind Labs official UI kit
Vue/Nuxt:
- Vuetify — Material Design (39K+ stars)
- PrimeVue — Rich enterprise suite (7K+ stars)
- Nuxt UI — Official Nuxt components (3K+ stars)
- Naive UI — Comprehensive Vue 3 (15K+ stars)
- Element Plus — Element for Vue 3 (23K+ stars)
- Headless UI — Tailwind Labs headless (24K+ stars)
For EACH recommended UI kit, document:
- Name and package registry link
- GitHub URL and star count
- Weekly downloads or popularity metric
- Component count — How many components included
- Theming — CSS variables, design tokens, theme builder
- Dark mode — Built-in support or manual
- Accessibility — WCAG level, ARIA support
- Figma kit — Available or not
- Storybook — Available or not
- Bundle size — Tree-shakeable, total size
- Maturity — Stable / Beta / Experimental
- License — MIT, Apache, etc.
- Recommendation level — Essential / Recommended / Optional
- Comparison note — How it compares to what competitors use
8.4: Build Tech Stack Comparison Table
Create a comparison showing:
| Technology Area | User's Product | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | ... | |---|---|---|---|---| | Frontend | Flutter 3.x | React | Vue.js | ... | | Backend | Supabase | Custom Node.js | Django | ... | | AI Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI + Custom | Anthropic | ... |
8.5: Generate Tech Stack Report
Produce a Tech Stack Report HTML containing:
- Competitor tech stack cards (what each competitor uses)
- Tech stack comparison table
- Recommended library cards grouped by category, with:
- Package name, description, GitHub stars, downloads
- Color-coded recommendation level (Essential=green, Recommended=blue, Optional=gray)
- Links to GitHub and package registry
- Installation commands (copy-pasteable)
- GitHub repos & starter kits section
- Architecture diagram suggestion based on recommended stack
Also add 3 new sheets to the Excel workbook:
- "Rakip Teknolojiler" (Competitor Technologies) — tech stack per competitor
- "Kutuphane Onerileri" (Library Recommendations) — all recommended packages with details
- "UI Kit Karsilastirma" (UI Kit Comparison) — competitor UI kits vs recommended UI kits with component count, theming, dark mode, accessibility, Figma kit, Storybook, bundle size
Step 9: Generate All Deliverables
Now produce all the files. Read the generation scripts from this skill's scripts/ directory:
File Generation Order:
- Create output folder:
`` mkdir -p "[OUTPUT_DIR]/[ProductName]_Competitive_Analysis" ``
- Generate Strategy DOCX — Read and customize
scripts/generate_strategy_docx.js
- Populate with YOUR researched data (features, competitors, gaps, AI opportunities, segments, marketing)
- Run with NODE_PATH set
- Generate Pricing DOCX — Read and customize
scripts/generate_pricing_docx.js
- Populate with YOUR pricing data, packages, Turkey/local pricing, revenue projections
- Generate Excel workbook — Read and customize
scripts/generate_excel.py
- Creates 10+ sheets: Feature Matrix, AI Opportunities, Target Segments, Gap Analysis, Competitor Pricing, Package Details, Local Pricing, Revenue Projection, Competitor Technologies, Library Recommendations
- Generate Tech Stack Report HTML — Build a self-contained HTML file with:
- Competitor tech stack cards
- Tech stack comparison table
- Recommended library cards (grouped by category, with GitHub stars, links, install commands)
- Architecture suggestion section
- Generate Complaints HTML — Build a self-contained HTML file with:
- Complaint cards per competitor with severity badges
- Heatmap table (complaint categories × competitors)
- Strategy cards showing how to exploit each weakness
- Generate Brand Suggestions HTML — Build an HTML file with:
- Competitor color swatches
- Color gap analysis
- 30 name cards with color palettes
- Generate Master Dashboard HTML — The crown jewel. A single interactive HTML file with:
- Dark theme (use emerald/green as default, or match user's brand)
- Fixed navigation with section links
- Hero with key stats (competitor count, feature count, AI
…
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: momentumfurkan
- Source: momentumfurkan/claude-competitive-intel
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.