AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Post Ticket Summary

skill-mostafa-drz-claude-skills-post-ticket-summary · by mostafa-drz

>-

No reviews yet
0 installs
32 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mostafa-drz-claude-skills-post-ticket-summary

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mostafa-drz-claude-skills-post-ticket-summary)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Post Ticket Summary? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Post Ticket Summary

Add a structured implementation summary comment to a Linear issue after completing work.

Preferences

Read ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md using the Read tool. If not found, no preferences are set.

Context

On startup, use Bash to detect: current git branch, recent commits (git log --oneline -20), and repo name (gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner). Skip any that fail.

Command routing

Check $ARGUMENTS:

  • help → display help then stop
  • config → interactive setup then stop
  • reset → delete ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md, confirm, stop
  • --preview → show comment without posting then stop
  • --minimal → use minimal template
  • anything else → post summary

Help

Post Summary — Document implementation on a Linear issue

Usage:
  /post-ticket-summary                Post full summary
  /post-ticket-summary --preview      Show without posting
  /post-ticket-summary --minimal      Short summary (skip architecture/reuse)
  /post-ticket-summary config                   Set template preferences
  /post-ticket-summary reset                    Clear preferences
  /post-ticket-summary help                     This help

Examples:
  /post-ticket-summary AIS-810
  /post-ticket-summary --preview AIS-810
  /post-ticket-summary --minimal AIS-810

What it does:
  1. Reads the Linear issue and codebase
  2. Analyzes recent commits and changed files
  3. Builds structured summary comment
  4. Posts to the Linear issue

Current preferences:
  (shown above under Preferences)

Config

Use AskUserQuestion:

Q1 — "Default template?" (full (default), minimal) Q2 — "Which sections to include?" (multiSelect: true)

  • Implementation summary
  • Key decisions / architecture
  • What was reused
  • How to test
  • Notes

Q3 — "Auto-detect issue from branch?" (Yes (default), No — always ask)

Save to ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md.

First-time detection

If no preferences file exists, show: "First time using /post-ticket-summary? Run /post-ticket-summary config to customize template sections, or continue with full template."

Then proceed.

Steps

1. Resolve issue

  • If issue ID provided in $ARGUMENTS, use it
  • If no ID and auto-detect is on, extract from branch name (pattern: user/ais-NNN-*)
  • If still no ID, ask via AskUserQuestion

Fetch the issue: title, description, project, status.

2. Check for existing summary

Fetch comments on the issue. If an implementation summary comment already exists, ask: "An implementation summary already exists. Replace it, or skip?"

3. Gather implementation details

From the codebase:

  • Recent commits on current branch (pre-injected)
  • Key files changed: git diff main...HEAD --stat (or appropriate base)
  • Read the main changed files to understand what was built

From project context:

  • CLAUDE.md for conventions
  • README.md for project overview

Ask user (optional — use AskUserQuestion with all optional):

  • Loom URL or recording link (or placeholder)
  • Live/staging URL for testing
  • Any additional context worth documenting

If user says "skip", use placeholders.

4. Build comment

Full template:

## Implementation Summary

{1-2 paragraphs: what was built and the product goal. Focus on business value.}

### What Was Reused

| Component | Source | Adaptation |
|-----------|--------|------------|
| {component} | {origin} | {what changed} |

---

## How to Test

**Branch:** `{branch}`
**Live URL:** {url or N/A}

### Steps
1. {step}
2. {step}
3. {step}

---

## Features

### 1. {Feature Name}

{2-3 sentences from user perspective. What they see, what they can do, business value.}

### 2. {Feature Name}

{Same structure}

---

## Key Decisions

| Decision | Rationale |
|----------|-----------|
| {decision} | {why} |

---

## Notes

- {Additional context}

Minimal template:

## Implementation Summary

{1-2 paragraphs}

## How to Test

**Branch:** `{branch}`

1. {step}
2. {step}

## Notes

- {anything important}

Apply section toggles from preferences.

Content guidelines

  • Summary: Lead with the problem, then what the implementation does.
  • Features: User perspective — what they see and do. No file paths.
  • Key Decisions: Focus on the "why" behind non-obvious choices.
  • Reuse: Show what was leveraged vs built new.

5. Post or preview

If --preview: display the comment and stop.

Otherwise: post via create_comment.

6. Report

Posted implementation summary to {issue-id}.

Sections: {list of included sections}

Next steps:
  1. Record Loom and update the link
  2. Add screenshots if relevant
  3. Replace any [PLACEHOLDER] markers

7. Learn

If user removes sections consistently, update preferences. If user adds custom sections, note the pattern.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.