AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Orchestrator

skill-mouchegmouradian-claude-code-skills-orchestrator · by mouchegmouradian

Coordinate large, multi-feature implementations by acting as an orchestrator that spawns focused sub-agents — one per RFC or feature area — while managing phasing, parallelization, and integration verification. Use this skill when a task spans 3+ independent features, multiple RFCs, or requires parallel implementation across different areas of the codebase. Also triggers on phrases like "orchestr…

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mouchegmouradian-claude-code-skills-orchestrator

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mouchegmouradian-claude-code-skills-orchestrator)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Orchestrator? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Orchestrator

Coordinate large implementations by acting as a planning-and-verification layer. Your job is to define phases, spawn focused sub-agents, and integrate their output — not to write code yourself.

This skill is the execution half of a two-skill pipeline:

  1. product-requirements-builder — produces the PRD and RFCs (the what and how)
  2. orchestrator (this skill) — executes them by coordinating sub-agents (the doing)

If no PRD/RFCs exist yet, use product-requirements-builder first. The orchestrator works best when it has a PRD and a set of RFCs to work from — they define the scope boundaries that prevent sub-agents from drifting.

Complexity Gate — Choose Your Mode

Before anything else, assess the task:

Is this task...

  Single file or focused area?
  ↓ Yes → Implement directly. This skill is not needed.

  2–5 files, one feature, sequential steps?
  ↓ Yes → Plan in tasks/todo.md, implement in main agent.

  3+ independent features, multi-RFC, or parallel work?
  ↓ Yes → Use this skill. Continue below.

Signals that warrant orchestration:

  • Implementation spans 3+ RFCs or feature areas
  • Features can be built in parallel (no shared dependencies within a phase)
  • Task is large enough that holding all context in one agent would degrade quality
  • A product requirements document (PRD) or implementation prompt already exists

Signals that do NOT warrant orchestration:

  • Bug fix, refactor, or single-screen addition
  • Adding a new field or updating an existing component
  • Task the user described in 1–2 sentences with no phase structure

Your Role as Orchestrator

You plan, coordinate, and verify. You do not write implementation code.

Your outputs are:

  1. An orchestration plan — phases, sub-agents, dependencies, parallelization
  2. Context briefs — the task description passed to each sub-agent
  3. Integration reviews — verification after each phase before proceeding
  4. A final verification checklist — end-to-end correctness check

Step 1 — Read First

Before defining any phases or spawning sub-agents, read:

  • The PRD — produced by product-requirements-builder, typically at PRD/PRD-[ProjectName].md or Product requirements/PRD-[ProjectName].md
  • The architecture RFC (RFC-000) — project structure, conventions, DI approach, naming rules
  • The data models RFC (RFC-001) — entity names, field types, relationships, constraints
  • Any other RFCs in scope — read them all before defining your phase breakdown

If no PRD or RFCs exist, stop and use the product-requirements-builder skill first. Orchestrating without clear scope boundaries causes sub-agents to drift and conflict.

This prevents sub-agents from producing conflicting code. Understanding the data model and naming conventions is critical — inconsistencies here cascade across the entire implementation.


Step 2 — Define Phases

Decompose the implementation into phases where:

  • Each phase contains work that can begin only after the previous phase completes
  • Within a phase, sub-agents that have no dependencies on each other run in parallel
  • Each sub-agent has a single, well-bounded scope (one RFC, one feature area)

Common phase structure:

Phase 1 — Foundation (sequential)
  1A: Project setup / scaffolding
  1B: Data models (after 1A)

Phase 2 — Core Services (parallel, after Phase 1)
  2A: Repository + use cases for Feature A
  2B: Repository + use cases for Feature B
  2C: Repository + use cases for Feature C
  [Integration checkpoint before Phase 3]

Phase 3 — UI Features (parallel, after Phase 2)
  3A: Shared UI components
  3B: Feature A screens
  3C: Feature B screens
  [Integration checkpoint before Phase 4]

Phase 4 — Navigation & Integration (after Phase 3)
  4A: App shell, tab bar, routing, settings

Adjust to the project. A smaller project might only need 2 phases. The key invariant: every sub-agent in a phase can start without waiting for siblings.


Step 3 — Write the Orchestration Plan

Before spawning any sub-agents, write your plan to tasks/todo.md:

# Orchestration Plan — [Project Name]

## Phase 1 — Foundation
- [ ] 1A: [scope] — depends on: nothing
- [ ] 1B: [scope] — depends on: 1A

## Phase 2 — [Name] (parallel)
- [ ] 2A: [scope]
- [ ] 2B: [scope]
- [ ] Integration checkpoint

## Phase 3 — [Name] (parallel)
- [ ] 3A: [scope]
- [ ] ...
- [ ] Integration checkpoint

## Phase 4 — [Name]
- [ ] 4A: [scope]

## Final Verification
- [ ] End-to-end checklist

Mark items complete as phases finish.


Step 4 — Spawn Sub-Agents

For each sub-agent, construct a context brief using this template:

You are implementing [feature/RFC name] for [project name].

Project context:
- [Tech stack, one line]
- [Key conventions: naming, DI, money/ID rules, etc.]
- [Critical shared components this agent must use but not reimplement]

Read these files before writing any code:
- [RFC document path]
- [Related files to understand before modifying]
- [Shared components or utilities this feature depends on]

Your task:
[Specific deliverables — file paths, what each file must contain]
[Explicit scope: "Do NOT implement X — that is handled elsewhere"]

Build and verify your work compiles before reporting back.

See [references/orchestration-patterns.md](references/orchestration-patterns.md) for full examples.

Within a phase: spawn all parallel sub-agents in a single message (one Agent tool call per sub-agent, sent simultaneously).

Between phases: wait for all sub-agents in the current phase to complete and pass integration review before spawning the next phase.


Step 5 — Integration Review (between phases)

After each phase completes, verify before proceeding:

Code consistency checks:

  • Entity/model names match across all sub-agents (field names, types, relationships)
  • No nil/stub values remain in the dependency injection container
  • No duplicate implementations of the same utility or component
  • Import paths and module references are correct

Architectural checks:

  • All sub-agents followed the naming conventions from RFC-000
  • Money/currency types are correct (e.g., Int64 cents, not Double)
  • Shared components are being used, not reimplemented

Build check:

  • The project should compile cleanly at the end of each phase before the next begins

If any sub-agent produced conflicting or incomplete output, fix it before moving forward. Do not accumulate drift across phases.


Step 6 — Final Verification Checklist

After all phases complete, verify end-to-end:

  • App/service launches without errors
  • Primary user flows work as intended
  • No stub or unimplemented code remains
  • All integration points wired correctly (DI container, routing, event handlers)
  • Edge cases from the PRD are covered
  • Build passes cleanly

What to Tell Each Sub-Agent (Full Example)

You are implementing the Accounts feature (RFC-013) for [App Name].

Tech stack: Swift 6, SwiftUI, SwiftData, async/await, @Observable ViewModels.
Money rule: all amounts as Int64 cents, never Double.
UUID rule: all IDs are UUID, generated client-side.
Architecture: Clean Architecture — UI → Domain (Use Cases) → Data (Repositories).

Read these files before writing any code:
- PRD/rfc-013-accounts.md
- PRD/rfc-001-data-models.md (for AccountModel schema)
- PRD/rfc-000-architecture.md (for AppContainer, folder structure)
- Core/AppContainer.swift (you will add account dependencies here)

Your deliverables (all file paths relative to project root):
- Core/Data/Repositories/AccountRepository.swift (protocol)
- Core/Data/Repositories/SwiftDataAccountRepository.swift (implementation)
- Core/Domain/UseCases/Accounts/SaveAccountUseCase.swift
- Core/Domain/UseCases/Accounts/FetchAccountsUseCase.swift
- Update Core/AppContainer.swift to wire accountRepository and account use cases

Do NOT implement: account UI screens (that is a separate sub-agent).
Do NOT reimplement: PersistenceController or any existing shared utilities.

Build and confirm the project compiles before reporting back.

Reference

  • [references/orchestration-patterns.md](references/orchestration-patterns.md) — Phase breakdown examples, context brief patterns, integration checkpoint patterns, conflict resolution
  • See example-implementation-prompt.md at the project root for a complete real-world orchestration prompt (Kasa iOS app, 4 phases, 12 sub-agents)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.