AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Control Theory Veto

skill-mr-fang-vlsi-edagent-control-theory-veto · by Mr-Fang-VLSI

Theory-level veto skill for EDA plans. Use before expensive experiment submissions or major flow/model changes to identify logically unsound assumptions, contradiction with known physics/policy, and high-risk invalid comparisons. Produces GO/CONDITIONAL/NO-GO with evidence.

No reviews yet
0 installs
29 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-mr-fang-vlsi-edagent-control-theory-veto

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-mr-fang-vlsi-edagent-control-theory-veto)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Control Theory Veto? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Control Theory Veto

Overview

This skill protects the loop from executing invalid ideas just because they are executable. It evaluates proposal validity against theory, known constraints, and policy, then emits a veto decision.

When to run

Run before:

  1. launching large/long job batches,
  2. changing objective/cost model assumptions,
  3. making algorithmic comparison claims,
  4. introducing new route/CTS/PDN policy that may break prior assumptions.

Inputs

Required:

  1. current user proposal (one-paragraph objective),
  2. relevant artifacts (latest summary/gate/monitor),
  3. KB references used by the proposal.

Recommended:

  1. primary-source/web references when assumptions may drift.
  2. recent experience-layer artifacts from eda-experiment-phenomenology-analyst when similar proposals have already been attempted.

Background Knowledge Links

This skill is only valid when its veto logic is linked to explicit background knowledge:

  1. relevant KB policy and physics notes,
  2. local paper-derived evidence when the proposal touches theory or model assumptions,
  3. scoped retrieval from eda-context-accessor when the needed KB or paper context is missing from the current brief.
  4. repeated empirical experience patterns when the proposal resembles prior failed or weak-information branches.

If a proposal conflicts with linked background knowledge, the veto must say so explicitly rather than treating the conflict as a generic risk.

Decision output contract

Always output:

  1. verdict: GO / CONDITIONAL / NO-GO
  2. blocking_reasons: numbered list
  3. assumption_table: assumption, evidence, status
  4. experience_risks: repeated empirical patterns that materially changed the verdict, or none
  5. safe_next_step: one minimal testable action
  6. override_policy:
  • NO-GO can be bypassed only with explicit user override.
  • when override happens, mark run as veto_overridden.

Operational References

  1. Load references/background-knowledge-links.md when deciding which KB docs, paper summaries, or scoped retrieval outputs are authoritative for the current proposal.
  2. Load references/veto-criteria.md when classifying contradiction severity or deciding whether the result is GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO-GO.
  3. Load references/decision-template.md when writing the final veto artifact.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.