Install
$ agentstack add skill-mrdesign-ww-vault-os-pm-skills ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Project Management — Domain Orchestrator & Delivery Loop
This orchestrator does two jobs. Routing: fork context, classify a PM inquiry with scripts/pm_goal_router.py, run exactly one of the 8 sub-skills, return a digest. Looping: turn a delivery goal into a bounded agentic loop — pull live Jira data via the bundled Atlassian MCP, bridge it into the domain's deterministic analytics tools, verify every step with machine-run gates, and refuse to close until everything is verified or a human waives it. The bundled .mcp.json wires the Atlassian Remote MCP (https://mcp.atlassian.com/v1/sse, OAuth handled by Claude Code).
When to invoke
| Symptom | Sub-skill | |---|---| | "Project/portfolio health, risk EMV, capacity" | senior-pm | | "Sprint velocity, retro follow-through, ceremony health, when-will-it-be-done" | scrum-master | | "JQL, Jira workflows, boards, automation" | jira-expert | | "Confluence spaces, page trees, content audits" | confluence-expert | | "Users, groups, permissions, SSO" | atlassian-admin | | "Reusable Jira/Confluence templates" | atlassian-templates | | "Meeting transcripts, talk time, action items" | meeting-analyzer | | "Status updates, 3P updates, stakeholder comms" | team-communications |
Routing logic (deterministic)
Run the router — do not eyeball the table when a script can decide:
python3 scripts/pm_goal_router.py --text "" --output json
Exit 0 → route_to names the sub-skill: load its SKILL.md and follow its workflow. Exit 2 → ask ONE clarifying question naming the listed candidates, with a recommended answer. Exit 3 → no signal: ask the user to restate the goal with the deliverable named. Never guess silently; never silently chain a second sub-skill — digest first, confirm, then chain.
The delivery loop (agentic)
For goals (not questions) — "get sprint 14 to a verified close", "produce a portfolio health report from live Jira", "make our flow metrics visible weekly" — run the loop-library contract (Observe → Choose → Act → Verify → Record → Repeat-or-stop):
- Observe — pull fresh state:
mcp__atlassian__searchJiraIssuesUsingJql(get
cloudId via getAccessibleAtlassianResources first), save the result JSON, then bridge it: ``bash python3 scripts/jira_snapshot_bridge.py --input snapshot.json --to flow # WIP, throughput, cycle time p50/85/95, work-item age, SLE, aging alerts python3 scripts/jira_snapshot_bridge.py --input snapshot.json --to sprint > s.json # scrum-master schema python3 ../scrum-master/scripts/velocity_analyzer.py s.json # velocity + volatility + forecast ` Add --forecast N for a seeded Monte Carlo "when will N items be done" answer (refuses on " --manifest engineering/agent-harness/skills/agent-harness/assets/harnesses/project-management.json \ --out .agent-harness/plan.json python3 engineering/agent-harness/skills/agent-harness/scripts/loop_controller.py init|next|record|verify|close ... `` Terminal states: success, clean no-op, blocked, approval-required, exhausted, stagnated. An exhausted budget is an escalation — never a success report.
Hard rules (agentic delegation governance)
- Agents are contributors, never owners (Linear model): every loop task carries a
named human owner; agent-executed tasks also carry a named human reviewer. delivery_loop_gate.py enforces this (G1/G2).
- Acceptance must be machine-checkable — a command, or a criterion with a threshold.
"Looks good" is not a gate (G3).
- Every Jira/Confluence write is auditable and reversible-first (Rovo discipline):
never transitionJiraIssue to Done without verify evidence; destructive/irreversible actions (deletes, permission changes, org-wide admin) are approval-required terminal states, not loop steps.
- Never modify a gate you are judged by — same locked-evaluator invariant as
autoresearch-agent.
- Forecasts are ranges with confidence, never dates — Monte Carlo percentiles
(p50/p70/p85/p95), per Vacanti. Single-date promises are the anti-pattern.
- Max 3 attempts per task, 12 loop iterations per goal — then escalate to the named
human with the evidence log.
Forcing-question library (grill-with-docs pattern)
One per turn, recommended answer, canon citation. Never run a sub-skill or start a loop until the lane-defining decision is locked:
- SPRINT lane: "Do you want to measure flow (cycle time, WIP, throughput, age) or
forecast delivery? Recommended: measure first — a forecast off unmeasured flow is noise. Canon: Kanban Guide (May 2025) four mandatory flow measures; Vacanti, Actionable Agile Metrics."
- HEALTH lane: "Is your project status self-reported RAG or derived from signals?
Recommended: derive it (schedule variance, aging WIP, scope churn) and diff against the self-report — that diff finds watermelon projects. Canon: Kanban Guide 2025; DORA 2025 (AI amplifies, doesn't fix, weak signals)."
- JIRA lane: "Is this configuration change deployable to a test project first?
Recommended: always stage in a test project; jira-expert's workflow validator must exit 0 before production. Canon: jira-expert validation workflow."
- ADMIN lane: "Is this action reversible, and who approves it? Recommended: name the
approver before touching permissions — admin actions are approval-required terminal states in any loop. Canon: atlassian-admin VERIFY discipline; loop-library stop states."
- LOOP intake: "What single observable outcome means DONE, and which command proves
it? Recommended: a named artifact + a command that exits 0 against it. Canon: agent-harness verifier's law; Anthropic, Building Effective Agents (evaluator needs clear criteria)."
- MEETINGS/COMMS lanes: "Could this meeting be an async written update? Recommended:
status-broadcast meetings convert to async 3P updates; decision meetings keep sync. Canon: GitLab async-first handbook."
Assumptions
- The user has (or is preparing analysis for someone with) delivery authority.
- Jira/Confluence access goes through the bundled MCP; capabilities NOT in
project-management/references/atlassian-mcp-tools.md (project/sprint/board/space creation, admin config) are done in the web UI — never invent tool names.
- Inputs may be partial — every tool ships
--sampleso the shape is visible first.
Non-goals
- Not a replacement for the sub-skills — the orchestrator routes and loops; the
sub-skills do the work.
- Not the generic loop engine — that is
engineering/agent-harness; this orchestrator is
the PM-domain adapter (data bridge + governance gate + lane router).
- Does not decide what to build — that's
product-team.
Output artifacts
| Mode | Artifact | |---|---| | Route | Sub-skill's own artifact + ≤ 200-word digest with one canon-cited challenge | | Flow report | flow_metrics.json (bridge output) with SLE conformance + aging alerts | | Delivery loop | .agent-harness/plan.json + state.json + gate verdicts + close handoff |
Anti-patterns (do not)
- ❌ Run all 8 sub-skills "to be thorough" — route to one, digest, chain on confirmation
- ❌ Report sprint health or forecasts from hand-typed numbers when a Jira snapshot is one
MCP call away — bridge real data
- ❌ Close a loop with unverified tasks, or report an exhausted budget as success
- ❌ Let an agent be the assignee of record — humans own, agents contribute
- ❌ Auto-transition Jira issues or touch permissions inside a loop without the named
approver
References
- [references/flowforecastingcanon.md](references/flowforecastingcanon.md) — Kanban
Guide 2025, Vacanti Monte Carlo, DORA 2025, EBM, SPACE
- [references/agenticdeliverygovernance.md](references/agenticdeliverygovernance.md) —
Linear/Rovo delegation models, Anthropic agent patterns, audit discipline
- [references/pmloopplaybook.md](references/pmloopplaybook.md) — the five reusable PM
loops (sprint, health, retro-action, RAID-hygiene, comms) mapped to the loop contract
- Canonical MCP tool list:
project-management/references/atlassian-mcp-tools.md - Loop engine:
engineering/agent-harness· Loop vocabulary:loop-library
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: mrDesign-ww
- Source: mrDesign-ww/vault-os
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.