Install
$ agentstack add skill-muhammad1438-academic-writer-skills-academic-writing-core ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Academic Writing Core
This is the master orchestrator for all academic writing tasks. It defines the foundational principles that govern all sub-skills and routes complex tasks to the appropriate specialist skill.
Core Philosophy
Academic writing is NOT a single style. It is a complex ecology of distinct discourse communities, each governed by its own epistemological values (what counts as knowledge) that dictate rhetorical conventions, syntactic preferences, and structural paradigms. Before producing any academic text, establish:
- Discipline — Which field? (STEM / Social Sciences / Humanities / Law / Medicine / Business)
- Paper Type — What genre? (Essay / Research Paper / Dissertation / Review / Report)
- Citation Style — Which format? (APA / MLA / Chicago / IEEE / Vancouver / Harvard)
- Audience — Experts in the field? Interdisciplinary? Instructors?
- Regional Tradition — US English or UK English?
Discipline-Specific Conventions at a Glance
Humanities (Literature, History, Philosophy, Art History)
- Voice: Active voice preferred — emphasizes human agency and interpretation
- Evidence: Direct quotation is primary evidence; exact wording of sources is deeply valued
- Tone: Reflective, interpretive, argumentative; nuanced close reading
- Citation: MLA (literature), Chicago NB (history/arts)
- Key genres: Literary analysis, historical monograph, philosophical argument essay
- First-person: Generally permitted for interpretive stance
Social Sciences (Psychology, Sociology, Education, Political Science)
- Voice: Mix; APA recommends active ("We conducted") for clarity
- Evidence: Paraphrase and synthesis of existing research dominates; statistics
- Tone: Strictly objective; extensive exploration of complex social phenomena
- Citation: APA 7th (psychology, education), Chicago Author-Date (political science)
- Key genres: Empirical research report, literature review, case study
- First-person: Permitted in APA 7th ("We found that...")
STEM (Physics, Engineering, Biology, Computer Science, Chemistry)
- Voice: Historically passive ("The experiment was conducted") — focuses on the phenomenon, not the researcher. Modern guidelines increasingly allow active for clarity.
- Evidence: Data, statistics, empirical reproducibility
- Tone: Strictly objective, information-dense, highly structured
- Citation: IEEE (engineering/CS), Vancouver (biomedicine), ACS (chemistry), CSE (sciences)
- Key genres: Lab report, technical report, conference paper, journal manuscript
- First-person: Traditionally avoided; check journal guidelines
Medicine and Health Sciences
- Voice: Passive dominant in clinical documentation; active allowed in discussion
- Tone: User-centered, legally precise, unambiguous
- Evidence: Clinical data, trials, systematic reviews; GRADE evidence hierarchy
- Citation: Vancouver (ICMJE) for journal manuscripts; APA for nursing education
- Key genres: SOAP notes, systematic reviews, clinical case reports, health policy briefs
Business and Management
- Voice: Active preferred — direct, persuasive, efficient
- Tone: Professional, persuasive, user-centered; "accentuating the positives"
- Style: HATS procedure (Headings, Art, Typography, Space) for document design
- Citation: APA or Chicago Author-Date
- Key genres: Business memo, white paper, market analysis, executive summary, grant proposal
Law
- Voice: Formal, precise, often impersonal
- Tone: Authoritative, structured, precedent-based
- Citation: Jurisdiction-specific (Bluebook for US, OSCOLA for UK)
- Key genres: Legal memoranda, case briefs, appellate briefs, law review articles
UK vs. US English — Quick Reference
| Feature | US English | UK English | |---|---|---| | Suffix | -ize, -yze (analyze, prioritize) | -ise, -yse (analyse, prioritise) | | Ending | -or (color, behavior) | -our (colour, behaviour) | | Consonants | Single (canceled, traveled) | Double (cancelled, travelled) | | Punctuation | Periods/commas INSIDE "quotes." | Periods/commas OUTSIDE 'quotes'. | | Collective nouns | Singular (The team is…) | Often plural (The team are…) | | Past participle | -ed (learned, burned) | -t or -ed (learnt, burnt) |
Rule: Never mix traditions within a single document. Choose one and be consistent throughout.
Routing to Sub-Skills
When the task falls into a specialist area, read the relevant SKILL.md:
| Task | Sub-Skill | |---|---| | Format or generate citations | citation-formatter/SKILL.md | | Academic vocabulary, hedging, transitions | academic-language-toolkit/SKILL.md | | Write or improve an abstract | abstract-writer/SKILL.md | | Paraphrase a source or avoid plagiarism | paraphrasing-engine/SKILL.md | | Write or structure a literature review | literature-review/SKILL.md | | Structure a full paper (IMRAD, essay, etc.) | paper-structure/SKILL.md | | Build an argument or critical analysis | argumentation-engine/SKILL.md | | Fix grammar, tone, style | grammar-style-checker/SKILL.md | | AI disclosure, ethics in academic writing | ai-academic-ethics/SKILL.md | | Write a grant proposal (NSF, NIH, EU, etc.) | grant-proposal/SKILL.md | | Write a research proposal (PhD, ethics, funding) | research-proposal/SKILL.md | | Write a lab report | lab-report/SKILL.md | | Respond to peer review / write a rebuttal letter | peer-review-response/SKILL.md | | Report statistical results | statistical-reporting/SKILL.md | | Write or compile in LaTeX | latex-writer/SKILL.md | | Check figures or tables | figure-table-checker/SKILL.md | | Choose a journal to submit to | journal-selection/SKILL.md | | Verify reference accuracy | reference-verifier/SKILL.md | | Write a data management plan | data-management-plan/SKILL.md | | Write a journal submission cover letter | cover-letter-writer/SKILL.md | | Report qualitative research findings | qualitative-reporting/SKILL.md | | Write a thesis or dissertation | thesis-dissertation-guide/SKILL.md | | Write a plain-language or lay summary | plain-language-summary/SKILL.md | | Preregister a research study | preregistration-guide/SKILL.md | | Design a conference poster or presentation | conference-presentation/SKILL.md | | Write an academic CV or job application materials | academic-cv/SKILL.md |
Publication Track
For researchers submitting to journals or applying for funding, the typical workflow is:
- Plan →
paper-structure/SKILL.mdorresearch-proposal/SKILL.md - Research →
literature-review/SKILL.md+argumentation-engine/SKILL.md - Write →
academic-language-toolkit/SKILL.md+abstract-writer/SKILL.md - Edit →
grammar-style-checker/SKILL.md+citation-formatter/SKILL.md - Funding →
grant-proposal/SKILL.md - Respond to reviewers →
peer-review-response/SKILL.md
Coursework Track
For students writing essays, reports, and dissertations:
- Structure →
paper-structure/SKILL.md - Research →
literature-review/SKILL.md - Write →
academic-language-toolkit/SKILL.md+paraphrasing-engine/SKILL.md - Lab work →
lab-report/SKILL.md - Edit →
grammar-style-checker/SKILL.md+citation-formatter/SKILL.md - Ethics →
ai-academic-ethics/SKILL.md
Universal Quality Checklist
Before finalizing any academic output, verify:
- [ ] Correct discipline conventions applied (voice, tone, evidence type)
- [ ] Consistent US or UK English throughout
- [ ] Citation style applied correctly and consistently
- [ ] Every claim supported by evidence or hedged appropriately
- [ ] No plagiarism — all sources cited, all paraphrases genuinely reworded
- [ ] No anthropomorphism (theories don't "argue" or "feel")
- [ ] Parallel structure in lists, headings, comparisons
- [ ] Appropriate tense conventions per section
- [ ] Bias-free, inclusive language throughout
- [ ] Abstract accurately represents the paper
Key Resources Referenced
- Purdue OWL: Writing in the Disciplines
- APA Publication Manual 7th Edition
- University of Manchester Academic Phrasebank
- Averil Coxhead's Academic Word List (AWL)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: muhammad1438
- Source: muhammad1438/academic-writer-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.