AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Python Package Development

skill-naareman-python-package-development-python-package-development · by Naareman

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
1 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-naareman-python-package-development-python-package-development

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-naareman-python-package-development-python-package-development)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Python Package Development? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

python-package-development

A skill for building Python packages with the philosophy of the R package ecosystem: clear user communication, principled API design, living documentation, and ceremonial lifecycle management.

The guiding question for every decision: "What would make this package feel like a thoughtful, professional tool — not just a collection of functions?"


How This Skill Is Organized

This SKILL.md gives you the philosophy and the map. For implementation details, read the relevant reference file from references/:

| What you're doing | Read | |---|---| | Starting a new package or setting up structure | [references/01-scaffold.md](references/01-scaffold.md) | | Designing function names, errors, user messages | [references/02-api-design.md](references/02-api-design.md) | | Writing or organizing tests | [references/03-testing.md](references/03-testing.md) | | Setting up or writing documentation | [references/04-docs.md](references/04-docs.md) | | Adding deprecations or managing versions | [references/05-lifecycle.md](references/05-lifecycle.md) | | Releasing to PyPI or setting up CI/CD | [references/06-release.md](references/06-release.md) | | Auditing for common anti-patterns | [references/07-common-mistakes.md](references/07-common-mistakes.md) | | Setting up pre-commit hooks | [references/08-pre-commit.md](references/08-pre-commit.md) | | Adding a CLI to your package | [references/09-cli-entry-points.md](references/09-cli-entry-points.md) | | Managing a monorepo / namespace packages | [references/10-monorepo.md](references/10-monorepo.md) | | Automating releases (bump, changelog, CI) | [references/11-automated-release.md](references/11-automated-release.md) | | Mocking in tests (APIs, filesystem, time) | [references/12-testing-mocking.md](references/12-testing-mocking.md) | | Snapshot testing | [references/13-testing-snapshots.md](references/13-testing-snapshots.md) | | FAQ (why these opinions?) | [references/14-faq.md](references/14-faq.md) |

Read only what's relevant to the current task. Don't load everything at once.


The Five Principles

Before touching any reference file, internalize these. They inform every decision.

1. User communication is a first-class concern

Every message a user sees — errors, warnings, progress, success — should be intentional. Use rich for structure and color. Use a consistent message hierarchy. Never let a raw traceback be the user's only feedback. The R cli package set this standard; rich is how we meet it in Python.

2. Function names form a grammar

Names should be guessable. Use verb_noun() patterns. Group related functions with shared prefixes. A user should be able to predict read_parquet() after seeing read_csv(). Consistency is more important than cleverness.

3. Lifecycle deserves ceremony

Deprecations are promises to users. When something changes, warn early, warn clearly, and give users a path forward. Never silently break things. Never deprecate without a timeline.

4. Documentation lives next to code

Docstrings are not optional and not a final step. They are written at the same time as the function. Use Google style consistently. mkdocstrings turns them into a website automatically.

5. There is a whole game

A user should be able to see a complete, working package early — not after mastering every detail. Scaffold first, refine later.


Anatomy of a Well-Structured Package

my-package/
├── pyproject.toml          ← single source of truth (uv-managed)
├── README.md               ← the story and quickstart
├── CHANGELOG.md            ← user-facing version history
├── mkdocs.yml              ← docs config (project root, not inside docs/)
├── src/
│   └── my_package/
│       ├── __init__.py     ← clean public API surface
│       ├── py.typed         ← PEP 561 marker for type checkers
│       ├── errors.py       ← structured exception hierarchy (public contract)
│       ├── _messages.py    ← rich console, message helpers
│       └── core.py         ← actual logic
├── tests/
│   ├── conftest.py         ← shared fixtures
│   └── test_core.py
└── docs/
    ├── index.md
    └── api.md

Key decisions encoded here:

  • src layout always — prevents accidental imports from the project root
  • errors.py is always its own file — errors are a public contract (no underscore: users import these directly)
  • _messages.py centralizes all user-facing output — never scattered print() calls
  • __init__.py is curated, not auto-imported — users see only what's intentional

Argument Routing

When invoked with /python-package-development , route based on the first argument:

| Invocation | Action | |---|---| | /python-package-development scaffold | Read [references/01-scaffold.md](references/01-scaffold.md) and create a new package named ` | | /python-package-development api | Read [references/02-api-design.md](references/02-api-design.md) and review/improve the current package's API | | /python-package-development test | Read [references/03-testing.md](references/03-testing.md) and set up or improve tests | | /python-package-development docs | Read [references/04-docs.md](references/04-docs.md) and set up or improve documentation | | /python-package-development lifecycle | Read [references/05-lifecycle.md](references/05-lifecycle.md) and manage deprecations | | /python-package-development release | Read [references/06-release.md](references/06-release.md) and walk through the release ritual | | /python-package-development check | Run python ${CLAUDESKILLDIR}/../../scripts/check-structure.py . then read [references/07-common-mistakes.md](references/07-common-mistakes.md) to fix any failures | | /python-package-development pre-commit | Read [references/08-pre-commit.md](references/08-pre-commit.md) and set up pre-commit hooks | | /python-package-development cli | Read [references/09-cli-entry-points.md](references/09-cli-entry-points.md) and add a CLI to the package | | /python-package-development` (no args) | Assess the current project against all five principles (see checklist below) |

When invoked without a subcommand (auto-triggered or plain /python-package-development):

Step 1 — Automated audit. Run the convention checker if available:

python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/check-structure.py .

Step 2 — Manual review of things the script can't check:

  1. Naming — Do public functions follow verb_noun()? Are families consistent?
  2. Documentation — Do all public functions have Google-style docstrings with Args/Returns/Raises?
  3. Messages — Is _messages.py actually used? Any bare print() calls?
  4. Lifecycle — Is __version__ from importlib.metadata? Any undocumented breaking changes?

Step 3 — Suggest improvements using the Quick Decision Guide below.


Quick Decision Guide

User asks to scaffold / create a new package: → Read [references/01-scaffold.md](references/01-scaffold.md). Walk through the whole game first.

User asks about function names, API shape, or error messages: → Read [references/02-api-design.md](references/02-api-design.md). Apply naming conventions and message hierarchy.

User asks about tests or is writing test code: → Read [references/03-testing.md](references/03-testing.md). Enforce pytest conventions and fixture patterns.

User asks about docs, docstrings, or mkdocs: → Read [references/04-docs.md](references/04-docs.md). Enforce Google docstrings and mkdocs-material setup.

User mentions deprecating something, versioning, or breaking changes: → Read [references/05-lifecycle.md](references/05-lifecycle.md). Apply the deprecation ceremony.

User wants to publish, release, or set up CI: → Read [references/06-release.md](references/06-release.md). Walk through PyPI + GitHub Actions setup.

Multiple concerns at once: → Read the most relevant reference first. Reference others by name when needed.


Common Mistakes — Catch These Early

When reviewing or generating Python package code, watch for these. If you see any, fix them immediately and explain why.

| Mistake | Why it's bad | Fix | |---|---|---| | Flat layout (no src/) | Imports source dir instead of installed package — tests pass locally, fail for users | Always use src/ layout | | from .module import * in __init__.py | Slow imports, polluted namespace, no control over public API | Explicit imports + __all__ | | --cov=src in pytest | Measures directory path, not importable module — confusing reports | --cov=my_package (the importable name) | | dependencies = ["requests"] (no version) | Breaking release silently breaks your package | Lower bound: "requests>=2.28" | | dependencies = ["requests>=2.28,=3.10,=3.10" | | __version__ = "0.1.0" hardcoded in two places | Version drift between pyproject.toml and code | Use importlib.metadata.version() | | Missing py.typed marker | Type checkers ignore all your annotations for downstream users | touch src/my_package/py.typed | | print() for user messages | Not styled, not catchable, not centralized | Use _messages.py with rich | | raise Exception("bad") | Too broad — users can't catch specific errors | Custom exception hierarchy in errors.py | | Dev deps in [project] dependencies | Users get pytest, ruff installed as transitive deps | Use [dependency-groups] (PEP 735) | | tests/__init__.py exists | Confuses package discovery, may ship tests in wheel | Remove it — use conftest.py instead | | MANIFEST.in for wheel contents | MANIFEST.in only affects sdist, not wheels | Use build backend config for wheel contents | | Pinned deps in library ("requests==2.31.0") | Impossible to install alongside anything else needing requests | Pins are for apps (lock files), not libraries | | mkdocs.yml inside docs/ | mkdocs serve looks in project root by default | Keep mkdocs.yml at project root |

For the full list with detailed explanations, see [references/07-common-mistakes.md](references/07-common-mistakes.md).


Tone When Helping

  • Be opinionated. This skill exists to have opinions. Don't offer five options when one is right.
  • Explain the why behind conventions, especially when they come from the R world.
  • When translating an R concept to Python, name the translation explicitly:

"This is the Python equivalent of rlang::abort() — here's how it maps."

  • Push back gently on anti-patterns (scattered print(), flat structure, inconsistent names)

but always offer the better path immediately.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.