Install
$ agentstack add skill-natan-mohart-24-finance-skills-for-claude-liquidity-stress-test ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Liquidity Stress Test
When to use
Use whenever cash position needs to be tested against a genuine downside, not just tracked under the current plan — before a board or lender conversation that will ask "what happens if revenue drops," or as a standing discipline for any business carrying real liquidity risk. Especially use to replace a stress test that stops at identifying the risk without sizing what specific actions would actually close the gap.
What it does
Applies a stated revenue-drop shock to the monthly net burn via a bundled calculator, projects the cash balance across the stress horizon, finds the trough month and the shortfall if cash would go negative, and ranks a list of candidate mitigations by exactly how much cash or runway each one restores — turning "we should probably cut costs" into a ranked, sized list of specific actions.
Method
- State the base monthly net burn under the current plan, before any shock is applied.
- Define the shock explicitly: a specific revenue drop percentage, not a vague "if things get worse." A defensible shock size usually comes from a real historical precedent or a specific plausible risk (a major customer churning, a macro downturn comparable to a past cycle).
- Account for collection delay as part of the shock, not just the revenue drop itself — a revenue shortfall often arrives with a lag in when cash actually stops coming in, and modeling only the revenue drop without the collection timing understates the near-term cash impact.
- Run the bundled calculator (
scripts/stress_test.py) to get the month-by-month stressed cash balance, the trough month, and the shortfall amount if the balance would go negative. - Build the mitigation list before the stress test, not after seeing a scary result. Real candidate actions: a credit line that could be drawn, specific opex cuts with their monthly savings, planned hires that could be delayed — each with an honest estimate of its cash or monthly-savings impact.
- Read the ranked mitigation output as the actual output of the exercise, not the trough number alone. The trough tells you there's a problem; the ranked list tells you what to actually do about it and how much each option is worth.
- Pre-commit to which mitigations trigger at which point, rather than deciding under pressure once the stress scenario starts to look real — name the specific cash level or month that would trigger drawing the credit line versus cutting discretionary spend.
Inputs
- Current cash and base monthly net burn
- The stress shock: revenue drop percentage and collection delay
- Stress horizon in months
- Candidate mitigations with their cash impact (one-time) or monthly savings (ongoing)
- Config saved as JSON matching the format documented at the top of
scripts/stress_test.py
Output format
Month-by-month stressed cash balance; trough cash and month; explicit shortfall flag if the balance goes negative; ranked mitigation list showing exactly how much cash or runway each option restores.
Example
A 30% revenue-drop shock, with a one-month collection delay factored in, shows the business would run out of cash by month 12, a $105,000 shortfall at the trough. Rather than stopping there, the ranked mitigation list shows drawing an available credit line restores $1M, dwarfing what an opex cut alone would provide in the same window — the specific, sized comparison the trough number alone never would have surfaced.
Common pitfalls
- Running a stress test that only identifies risk without ranking what mitigations would actually close the resulting gap.
- Applying the revenue shock without accounting for the collection delay that typically comes with it, understating the near-term impact.
- Deciding on mitigations only after the crisis starts, instead of pre-committing to specific triggers ahead of time.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Natan-Mohart
- Source: Natan-Mohart/24-finance-skills-for-claude
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.