AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Liquidity Stress Test

skill-natan-mohart-24-finance-skills-for-claude-liquidity-stress-test · by Natan-Mohart

Applies a revenue-drop shock to the cash position via a bundled calculator, finds the trough month and shortfall if any, and ranks available mitigations by how much cash or runway each actually restores, instead of a stress test that ends at "here's what could go wrong" with no sized response. Use whenever the user needs to stress-test liquidity against a downside scenario, is preparing a conting…

— No reviews yet
0 installs
23 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-natan-mohart-24-finance-skills-for-claude-liquidity-stress-test

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-natan-mohart-24-finance-skills-for-claude-liquidity-stress-test)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 24d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Liquidity Stress Test? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Liquidity Stress Test

When to use

Use whenever cash position needs to be tested against a genuine downside, not just tracked under the current plan — before a board or lender conversation that will ask "what happens if revenue drops," or as a standing discipline for any business carrying real liquidity risk. Especially use to replace a stress test that stops at identifying the risk without sizing what specific actions would actually close the gap.

What it does

Applies a stated revenue-drop shock to the monthly net burn via a bundled calculator, projects the cash balance across the stress horizon, finds the trough month and the shortfall if cash would go negative, and ranks a list of candidate mitigations by exactly how much cash or runway each one restores — turning "we should probably cut costs" into a ranked, sized list of specific actions.

Method

  1. State the base monthly net burn under the current plan, before any shock is applied.
  2. Define the shock explicitly: a specific revenue drop percentage, not a vague "if things get worse." A defensible shock size usually comes from a real historical precedent or a specific plausible risk (a major customer churning, a macro downturn comparable to a past cycle).
  3. Account for collection delay as part of the shock, not just the revenue drop itself — a revenue shortfall often arrives with a lag in when cash actually stops coming in, and modeling only the revenue drop without the collection timing understates the near-term cash impact.
  4. Run the bundled calculator (scripts/stress_test.py) to get the month-by-month stressed cash balance, the trough month, and the shortfall amount if the balance would go negative.
  5. Build the mitigation list before the stress test, not after seeing a scary result. Real candidate actions: a credit line that could be drawn, specific opex cuts with their monthly savings, planned hires that could be delayed — each with an honest estimate of its cash or monthly-savings impact.
  6. Read the ranked mitigation output as the actual output of the exercise, not the trough number alone. The trough tells you there's a problem; the ranked list tells you what to actually do about it and how much each option is worth.
  7. Pre-commit to which mitigations trigger at which point, rather than deciding under pressure once the stress scenario starts to look real — name the specific cash level or month that would trigger drawing the credit line versus cutting discretionary spend.

Inputs

  • Current cash and base monthly net burn
  • The stress shock: revenue drop percentage and collection delay
  • Stress horizon in months
  • Candidate mitigations with their cash impact (one-time) or monthly savings (ongoing)
  • Config saved as JSON matching the format documented at the top of scripts/stress_test.py

Output format

Month-by-month stressed cash balance; trough cash and month; explicit shortfall flag if the balance goes negative; ranked mitigation list showing exactly how much cash or runway each option restores.

Example

A 30% revenue-drop shock, with a one-month collection delay factored in, shows the business would run out of cash by month 12, a $105,000 shortfall at the trough. Rather than stopping there, the ranked mitigation list shows drawing an available credit line restores $1M, dwarfing what an opex cut alone would provide in the same window — the specific, sized comparison the trough number alone never would have surfaced.

Common pitfalls

  • Running a stress test that only identifies risk without ranking what mitigations would actually close the resulting gap.
  • Applying the revenue shock without accounting for the collection delay that typically comes with it, understating the near-term impact.
  • Deciding on mitigations only after the crisis starts, instead of pre-committing to specific triggers ahead of time.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.