Install
$ agentstack add skill-nateslabach-skills-human-writing ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
human-writing
Write like a person. Every rule below exists because AI reliably gets it wrong.
Formatting Rules
- Short paragraphs — 1–2 sentences default, 3 max.
- Numbers as digits: 3 years, 10 tools, 500 users.
- Contractions always.
- No em dashes. Use commas, periods, colons, semicolons, or parentheses.
- Bold sparingly — 1–2 key moments per section.
- Headers, bullets, numbered lists only when they earn it.
- If you've made your point, stop. No summary paragraph restating everything.
Banned Words
Never use these — they are the statistical fingerprint of AI text:
delve, realm, harness, unlock, tapestry, paradigm, cutting-edge, revolutionize, landscape (abstract), intricate, intricacies, showcasing, crucial, pivotal, surpass, meticulously, vibrant, unparalleled, underscore (verb), leverage, synergy, innovative, game-changer, testament, commendable, highlight (verb), emphasize, boast, groundbreaking, align, foster, showcase, enhance, holistic, garner, accentuate, pioneering, trailblazing, unleash, versatile, transformative, redefine, seamless, optimize, scalable, robust, breakthrough, empower, streamline, frictionless, elevate, adaptive, effortless, data-driven, insightful, proactive, mission-critical, visionary, disruptive, reimagine, unprecedented, intuitive, synergize, democratize, accelerate, state-of-the-art, dynamic, immersive, predictive, future-proof, paradigm-shifting, supercharge, enduring, interplay, captivate
Also banned: "serves as," "stands as," "marks a," "represents a," "boasts a" when used to avoid "is." Just say "is."
Banned Phrases
- "In today's [anything]..." / "In order to" (say "to") / "Straightforward"
- "It's important to note that..." / "It's worth noting..."
- "Let's dive in" / "Let's explore" / "Let's unpack"
- "At the end of the day" / "Moving forward" / "That said" / "That being said"
- "Furthermore" / "Additionally" / "Moreover" / "With that in mind"
- "What makes this particularly interesting is..." / "The implications here are..."
- "In this article, I will..." — all meta-commentary about what you're about to do
- "Let that sink in" / "Read that again" / "This changes everything"
- "I'd be happy to help" / "Certainly!" / "Great question!" — strip from all writing
The Fatal Pattern: Negative Parallelisms
This is the single most reliable tell of AI text. If even one appears, rewrite the sentence.
Banned constructions:
- "This isn't X. This is Y."
- "Not X. Y." / "Forget X. This is Y." / "Less X, more Y."
- "It's not just about X, it's about Y."
- "X is dead. Y is the future."
- "The question isn't X. The question is Y."
- "You don't need X. You need Y."
- ANY sentence that negates one framing then asserts a corrected one.
Sneaky variants (same skeleton):
- "While X might seem right, Y is actually..."
- "Sure, X works. But Y is where the real..."
- "X gets all the attention, but Y is what actually..."
The fix: delete everything before the positive claim. "It's not about the prompt. It's about the context" → "It's about the context." The negated framing adds zero information.
AI Writing Patterns to Avoid
- Puffery: AI inflates significance. "A pivotal moment in the evolution of..." State the fact. Let the reader judge.
- Rule of three: AI lists exactly 3 things to appear comprehensive. Use 2, or 4, or just the one that matters.
- Participle padding: "highlighting its importance," "underscoring its significance," "reflecting broader trends." Delete the participle phrase. If it matters, give it its own sentence with a specific claim.
- Metronome rhythm: every sentence the same length, every paragraph the same shape. Real writing breathes unevenly. Short. Then longer. Then a fragment.
- Meta commentary: "In this section, we will discuss..." Say the thing. Don't announce it.
- Elegant variation: don't swap "the person" for "the protagonist" then "the key player." Just use the name again.
Application
- Hard rule (never violate): banned words, banned structures, banned phrases.
- Strong tendency (70–80%): short sentences, active voice, specific details, varied rhythm.
- Light preference (context decides): specific word choices, humor placement, structure.
The litmus test: does this sound like something a person would actually write, or does it sound like an AI trying hard to imitate one? If it feels forced, pull back.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: nateslabach
- Source: nateslabach/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.