Reports

Reports

Inspect or export stored report artifacts for: $ARGUMENTS

Overview

• Implementation status: workflow-only
• Current backing path: use persisted report.md, state.json, and metadata.json artifacts from prior runs
• Primary purpose: surface exact stored outputs with rigorous provenance rather than recomputing them unnecessarily
• Research layer: artifact retrieval and faithful restatement only

Use When

• The user wants a stored report, saved state file, or run metadata.
• The caller wants to inspect a prior analysis, stock-data, or market-brief result without rerunning it.
• The user wants export-oriented access to already generated outputs.
• The user asks to "show me the last report" or "what did the analysis say."

Do Not Use When

• There is no prior artifact and the user actually wants fresh analysis.
• The user wants broad historical comparison or change-over-time analysis. Use analysis-history.
• The user only needs recent context locations. Use session-status.

Inputs

• A run directory, report path, state path, metadata path, or an implied recent run.
• Optional symbol or date scope chosen by the host framework.
• Prefer explicit run or file references when reproducibility matters.

Execution

Step 1: Locate the exact artifact with explicit provenance

Prefer an explicit run directory or file path. Otherwise use session history, manifests, and the runtime runs/ tree to resolve the most likely target.

Provenance requirements:

• Identify the artifact path (full path to run directory or file)
• Identify the generating command (from metadata.json if available)
• Identify the generation timestamp (from metadata.json or file system)
• Identify the symbol and any key parameters (from state.json or metadata.json)

Step 2: Read the artifact together with provenance

Use metadata.json first when available, then report.md for human-readable output and state.json for structured inspection.

Mandatory provenance disclosure: Every artifact retrieval must state:

• Artifact path: full path to the run directory or file
• Generation time: when the artifact was created
• Generating command: the command that produced it (if available)
• Content type: whether returning verbatim content, extracted fields, or summary

Step 3: Return the stored content faithfully

Return the requested artifact content, path, or extracted fields without rerunning the analytical workflow. Preserve the stored wording unless the user explicitly asks for a summary.

Faithful restatement rules:

• Do not paraphrase artifact content into new narrative unless explicitly requested
• Do not blend artifact content with fresh interpretation without labeling the boundary
• Do not update or "improve" the stored language to reflect current knowledge
• If the stored content contains errors or outdated information, surface it as-is and note that it reflects the state at generation time

Step 4: Guard against artifact confusion

When multiple artifacts exist or when the resolved artifact may not be what the user intended:

• State which fallback rule was used to select the artifact
• Offer to retrieve a different artifact if the user specifies one
• If the user asks about "the analysis" but multiple analyses exist, list the candidates and ask for clarification

Output Contract

• Output should reference real stored artifact paths whenever possible.
• Caller-facing delivery standard:
• Mandatory provenance disclosure: every response must include artifact path, generation time, and generating command (when available)
• Content type labeling: state whether the response is verbatim artifact content, extracted fields, or a short summary
• Faithful restatement: preserve the provenance of the stored result instead of paraphrasing it into an untraceable new narrative
• Temporal clarity: make clear that the artifact reflects the state at generation time, not current state
• No silent updates: do not "fix" or "improve" stored content to reflect current knowledge without explicit user request
• Artifact confusion prevention: when multiple candidates exist, state which was selected and why
• Local limitation: no dedicated alternate export renderer is guaranteed beyond the stored files.

Failure Handling

• If the target report is not found, return a direct not-found explanation with the search path used.
• If the artifact exists but is malformed, surface that parsing issue explicitly and return whatever content is recoverable.
• If multiple candidate runs match, prefer the most explicit path or state which fallback rule was used (e.g., "latest run for symbol X from command Y").
• If provenance metadata is incomplete, state what is missing (e.g., "generation command not available in metadata").

Key Rules

• Prefer reading stored artifacts over rerunning analysis.
• Provenance disclosure is mandatory, not optional. Every artifact retrieval must state path, generation time, and command.
• Faithful restatement is required. Do not paraphrase stored content into new narrative without labeling the boundary.
• Temporal clarity matters. Make clear that artifacts reflect the state at generation time, not current state.
• If the user asks to compare, browse, or narrate change over time, route to analysis-history.
• Guard against artifact confusion by stating which artifact was selected when multiple candidates exist.

Composition

• Often follows analysis, stock-data, or market-brief.
• Pairs with analysis-history and session-status.
• Should feed into backtest-evaluator when retrospective evaluation is needed.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: NatsuFox
• Source: NatsuFox/A-Stockit
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.