Install
$ agentstack add skill-nembie-claude-code-skills-code-reviewer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ● Filesystem access Used
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ● Environment & secrets Used
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Code Reviewer
Before generating any output, read config/defaults.md and adapt all patterns, imports, and code examples to the user's configured stack.
Review Process
- Read all files in scope (specified files, PR diff, or project)
- Analyze each file against the review categories below
- Output structured findings with severity levels
- Provide actionable fix suggestions
Review Categories
Security
Injection Vulnerabilities
// BAD: SQL injection
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;
// GOOD: Parameterized query
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: userId } });
XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
// BAD: Rendering unsanitized HTML
// GOOD: Sanitize or use text content
{sanitizeHtml(userContent)}
// Or just render as text
{userContent}
Authentication Leaks
// BAD: Exposing sensitive data
return NextResponse.json({ user: { ...user, password: user.password } });
// GOOD: Exclude sensitive fields
const { password, ...safeUser } = user;
return NextResponse.json({ user: safeUser });
Hardcoded Secrets
// BAD
const API_KEY = 'sk-1234567890abcdef';
// GOOD
const API_KEY = process.env.API_KEY;
Path Traversal
// BAD: User-controlled file path
const filePath = `./uploads/${req.query.filename}`;
// GOOD: Validate and sanitize
const filename = path.basename(req.query.filename);
const filePath = path.join('./uploads', filename);
Performance
N+1 Queries
See prisma-query-optimizer skill for detection patterns.
Memory Leaks
// BAD: Event listener not cleaned up
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize);
}, []);
// GOOD: Cleanup on unmount
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize);
return () => window.removeEventListener('resize', handleResize);
}, []);
Unbounded Operations
// BAD: Loading all records
const allUsers = await prisma.user.findMany();
// GOOD: Paginate
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({ take: 50, skip: offset });
Synchronous File I/O
// BAD: Blocks event loop
const data = fs.readFileSync('large-file.json');
// GOOD: Async I/O
const data = await fs.promises.readFile('large-file.json');
Maintainability
Magic Numbers
// BAD
if (status === 3) { ... }
// GOOD
const STATUS_COMPLETED = 3;
if (status === STATUS_COMPLETED) { ... }
// BETTER: Use enum or const object
const Status = { COMPLETED: 3 } as const;
Deep Nesting
// BAD: Arrow code
if (user) {
if (user.isActive) {
if (user.hasPermission('write')) {
// ...
}
}
}
// GOOD: Early returns
if (!user) return;
if (!user.isActive) return;
if (!user.hasPermission('write')) return;
// ...
God Functions
Functions over 50 lines or with more than 5 parameters should be broken down.
Dead Code
Unused imports, unreachable code after return/throw, commented-out code blocks.
Naming Conventions
Inconsistent Naming
// BAD: Mixed styles
const user_name = '...';
const userEmail = '...';
const UserAge = 25;
// GOOD: Consistent camelCase for variables
const userName = '...';
const userEmail = '...';
const userAge = 25;
Unclear Names
// BAD
const d = new Date();
const arr = users.filter(u => u.a);
// GOOD
const createdAt = new Date();
const activeUsers = users.filter(user => user.isActive);
Error Handling
Swallowed Errors
// BAD: Silent failure
try {
await saveData();
} catch (e) {
// Nothing
}
// GOOD: Log or handle
try {
await saveData();
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to save:', error);
throw error; // Or handle appropriately
}
Generic Catch
// BAD: Catches everything including programming errors
try {
doSomething();
} catch (e) {
return defaultValue;
}
// GOOD: Catch specific errors
try {
doSomething();
} catch (error) {
if (error instanceof NetworkError) {
return defaultValue;
}
throw error;
}
Test Coverage Gaps
Untested Edge Cases
Flag functions that handle:
- Null/undefined inputs without tests
- Empty arrays/objects without tests
- Error conditions without tests
- Boundary values without tests
Missing Integration Tests
API routes and database operations should have integration tests.
Output Format
## Code Review Report
### Critical (must fix before merge)
| Severity | File | Line | Issue | Category |
|----------|------|------|-------|----------|
| CRITICAL | src/api/users.ts | 45 | SQL injection vulnerability | Security |
**Details:**
- Issue: User input directly interpolated into query string
- Fix: Use parameterized queries via Prisma
```typescript
// Before
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}'`;
// After
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { email } });
Warnings (should fix)
| Severity | File | Line | Issue | Category | |----------|------|------|-------|----------| | WARNING | src/hooks/useData.ts | 23 | Missing cleanup in useEffect | Performance |
Info (suggestions)
| Severity | File | Line | Issue | Category | |----------|------|------|-------|----------| | INFO | src/utils/format.ts | 12 | Magic number should be named constant | Maintainability |
Summary
- Critical: X issues
- Warnings: X issues
- Info: X issues
- Files reviewed: X
## Severity-Based Prioritization
After completing the review, sort all findings by severity. If any critical security issue is found, prepend a prominent warning at the top of the output: `⚠ CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE — address before anything else.` Do not bury critical findings in a long list of minor style suggestions. If there are more than 15 findings, group by severity and show only critical + warning by default, with info-level findings in a collapsed section.
## Reference
See `references/review-checklist.md` for the complete review criteria organized by category.
## Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- **Author:** [Nembie](https://github.com/Nembie)
- **Source:** [Nembie/claude-code-skills](https://github.com/Nembie/claude-code-skills)
- **License:** MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.