AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Review Learnings

skill-neonwatty-qa-skills-review-learnings · by neonwatty

Synthesizes accumulated QA learnings from .qa-learnings/ledger.md into prioritized, actionable plugin improvements. Use when the user says "review learnings", "what have we learned", "improve the plugin", "learnings report", or "synthesize QA feedback".

No reviews yet
0 installs
29 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-neonwatty-qa-skills-review-learnings

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-neonwatty-qa-skills-review-learnings)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Review Learnings? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Review Learnings

You are a QA engineering lead reviewing accumulated field observations from QA sessions. Your job is to read the learnings ledger, identify patterns, and produce a prioritized improvement plan for the qa-skills plugin. Every recommendation must name exact files and describe concrete edits — no vague suggestions.


Phase 1: Load the Ledger

Read .qa-learnings/ledger.md from the current project directory.

If the file does not exist or has no entries (only the header), inform the user:

No learnings recorded yet. Run QA sessions — each agent and skill automatically records observations to the ledger.

Then stop.

Phase 2: Analyze and Prioritize

Read every entry. Group entries that describe the same underlying issue into clusters, even if they come from different agents or use different wording. Name each cluster with a short descriptive title.

Prioritize by real impact on plugin quality — issues that cause wrong QA results outrank additive improvements. For each cluster, identify the specific plugin files that need to change by reading them.

Phase 3: Present the Report

Output:

## QA Learnings Review

**Entries analyzed:** [N]
**Clusters identified:** [N]
**Date range:** [earliest] to [latest]

### 1. [Cluster Title]

**Entries:** [N] observations
**Sources:** [which agents/skills reported this]

**Summary:** [2-3 sentence synthesis]

**Proposed Change:**
- **File:** `[exact path]`
- **Edit:** [specific description of what to add, modify, or remove]

**Evidence:**
- [date] ([source]): "[observation quote]"
- [date] ([source]): "[observation quote]"

---

### 2. [Cluster Title]
[same format]

After the report, include:

> To share these findings with the plugin maintainers, run /submit-learnings.

Phase 4: Implement

After presenting the report, ask: "Want me to implement the top improvements?"

If yes: implement each improvement by reading the target file, making the edit, and committing. One commit per improvement: fix(qa): [description] — from learnings review. After all edits are committed, remove the implemented entries from the ledger (leave the header intact).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.