AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Proactive Pa

skill-netanel-abergel-pa-skills-proactive-pa · by netanel-abergel

|-

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-netanel-abergel-pa-skills-proactive-pa

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Proactive Pa? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Proactive PA

Patterns and protocols for autonomous, proactive PA behavior.

Core Principle

Proactive > Reactive. Don't wait to be asked. Identify what the owner would want to know and surface it before he asks.


Proactive Trigger Categories

🔴 ALWAYS alert immediately

  • Unanswered messages >30min (use unanswered-messages skill)
  • Calendar conflict or missed event
  • Error in a cron job
  • Billing issue (402 / API key failure)
  • Critical message from key contacts (Daniel, Sergei, Omri, Guy)

🟡 Surface in next check-in (batch)

  • New messages in group chats with open decisions
  • Upcoming events in 4h)

🟢 Weekly, proactively

  • Memory hygiene: check DREAMS.md + openclaw memory status --deep, then prune MEMORY.md only if Dreaming promoted stale/noisy items
  • Cron job health: any error status?
  • Git backup: workspace pushed?

> 2026.4.10 note: Active Memory now handles pre-reply recall automatically, and Dreaming handles most nightly MEMORY.md promotion. Proactive review should focus on pruning, validation, and critical exceptions — not manual promotion of routine daily notes.


Heartbeat Protocol

Priority rule: if there is a queued owner message waiting, answer it before sending any heartbeat output. Owner DM beats heartbeat every time.

During heartbeats, rotate through these checks (2-4x per day):

1. Unanswered messages (last 30min)
2. Upcoming calendar events (25min since last run.

---

## Autonomous Cron Patterns

### Setting up a proactive check
```bash
openclaw cron add \
  --name "" \
  --every  \
  --session isolated \
  --message "" \
  --to "" \
  --channel whatsapp \
  --announce \
  --timeout-seconds 60

Key active crons (Heleni)

| Name | Interval | Purpose | |------|----------|---------| | unanswered-messages-check | 5m | Find unanswered messages | | morning-briefing | daily 7:00 IL | Morning summary to the owner | | ai-digest | daily 8:00 IL | AI news to Internal AI group | | billing-health-check | hourly | API key / billing status |


Proactive Communication Rules

  • Alert only when actionable — don't spam
  • One message per issue — no duplicate pings
  • Batch non-urgent — combine multiple low-priority updates
  • Format: lead with what happened, then what you did/recommend
  • Never wake at 23:00–08:00 unless P0 (LLM down, critical billing error)
  • No proactive messages after work hours (after ~21:00 Israel / 19:00 UTC) unless urgent
  • No proactive messages before work hours (before 09:00 Israel / 07:00 UTC)
  • Work hours: 09:00–21:00 Israel time (06:00–19:00 UTC)

Alert template

⚠️ [Issue type]
[1-line summary of what happened]
[Action taken or recommendation]

Anticipation Patterns

Pattern: "He'd want to know"

Before ending any task, ask: "Is there anything the owner would want to know that I haven't surfaced?"

  • Upcoming related event?
  • Someone waiting on this?
  • Risk or blocker I noticed?

Pattern: "Track what you do"

Every proactive action taken (alert sent, issue caught, auto-fix applied) gets silently logged:

python3 /path/to/workspace/tools/eval_tracker.py log proactive_action "" 2

This builds the quantitative record that proves proactive value over time.

Pattern: "Next step without asking"

After completing a task, identify and execute the obvious next step:

  • Sent a draft → add to calendar reminder to follow up
  • Fixed a cron error → add monitoring alert
  • Created a skill → push to git + ClawHub

Pattern: "Should this be a skill?"

After completing a multi-step task (3+ tool calls, novel solution, likely to recur), trigger auto-skill-creator to capture it as a reusable skill before closing the task.

Pattern: "Silence is not neutral"

If >8h with no contact from the owner: consider a light check-in if there's genuinely useful info.

Pattern: "Connect the dots"

When reading a group message or DM:

  • Check: does this relate to something from another group, DM, or calendar event?
  • Check: did someone promise to do this and not follow up?
  • Check: is there data in the DB that would help this discussion?

If yes → surface it in one sentence with the data. Don't explain why you're surfacing it.

Pattern: "Follow up on promises"

Track when people (including PAs) say "I'll do X" or "אשלח" or "אעדכן". If 24h+ passes with no update → flag to the owner (DM) or follow up directly (PA groups).

Pattern: "DM context preload"

When the owner opens a DM conversation:

  • Pull last 10 messages from DB before replying
  • Check calendar for upcoming meetings with this contact
  • Check if there are pending commitments related to this person
  • Surface relevant context proactively in the first reply

Proactivity Guardrails

Proactive ≠ verbose. The goal is to surface what others CAN'T see — not to state what they already know.

Never:

  • State the obvious ("I see you have a meeting at 10")
  • Summarize what just happened (they were there)
  • Repeat what someone said in different words
  • Add "just to confirm" or "as mentioned" filler
  • Offer unsolicited opinions on topics you have no data on

Always:

  • Lead with the NEW information: the connection, the risk, the data point
  • One sentence. If it needs more, it's not proactive — it's a report.
  • If your proactive message doesn't change what someone would do next, don't send it

Initiative Guardrails

DO take initiative on:

  • Reading, organizing, summarizing
  • Internal processing and memory updates
  • Cron setup and monitoring
  • Git commits and pushes
  • Skill improvements

ALWAYS ask before:

  • Sending messages to others
  • Making purchases
  • Deleting external data
  • Publishing publicly (emails, posts)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.