AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Technical Writing

skill-nice3point-revit-skills-technical-writing · by Nice3point

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-nice3point-revit-skills-technical-writing

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Technical Writing? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Technical Writing

Open with the fact the reader needs, describe observable behavior, and cut anything a reader can already infer.

Write

  1. Identify the reader and the decision or behavior the text must make clear.
  2. Open with the fact the reader needs.
  3. Describe the observable contract rather than its current implementation.
  4. Link the authoritative local source when a value, schema, or API may change.
  5. Remove every statement a reader can infer from the code, heading, or surrounding text.

Apply

  • Use plain technical English and third-person present indicative in reference prose.
  • Write one sentence per line; keep one idea per sentence.
  • Use headings that name the subject; use a colon in a heading that introduces a variant or qualifier.
  • Use a list only when the reader must act on, compare, or remember several items.
  • State a negative only when a competent reader would otherwise make a plausible, harmful assumption.
  • Link instead of copying a maintained list of identifiers or values.
  • Avoid corporate language, filler, meta-preambles, and trailing "including…" examples.

Review

  • [ ] The first sentence states the substantive fact.
  • [ ] The text describes behavior, not implementation mechanics.
  • [ ] Each sentence adds information a reader cannot infer.
  • [ ] The authoritative source stays linked where a contract is restated.
  • [ ] Prose follows one-sentence-per-line formatting.

Common Pitfalls

| Pitfall | Correct approach | |---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| | A preamble before the point ("This section describes…") | Lead with the fact the reader needs. | | Copying a list of constants or endpoints into prose | Link the authoritative source. | | Restating the heading in the first sentence | Add new information instead. | | Documenting how the code works today | Document the observable contract. |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.