Install
$ agentstack add skill-nice3point-revit-skills-technical-writing ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Technical Writing
Open with the fact the reader needs, describe observable behavior, and cut anything a reader can already infer.
Write
- Identify the reader and the decision or behavior the text must make clear.
- Open with the fact the reader needs.
- Describe the observable contract rather than its current implementation.
- Link the authoritative local source when a value, schema, or API may change.
- Remove every statement a reader can infer from the code, heading, or surrounding text.
Apply
- Use plain technical English and third-person present indicative in reference prose.
- Write one sentence per line; keep one idea per sentence.
- Use headings that name the subject; use a colon in a heading that introduces a variant or qualifier.
- Use a list only when the reader must act on, compare, or remember several items.
- State a negative only when a competent reader would otherwise make a plausible, harmful assumption.
- Link instead of copying a maintained list of identifiers or values.
- Avoid corporate language, filler, meta-preambles, and trailing "including…" examples.
Review
- [ ] The first sentence states the substantive fact.
- [ ] The text describes behavior, not implementation mechanics.
- [ ] Each sentence adds information a reader cannot infer.
- [ ] The authoritative source stays linked where a contract is restated.
- [ ] Prose follows one-sentence-per-line formatting.
Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Correct approach | |---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------| | A preamble before the point ("This section describes…") | Lead with the fact the reader needs. | | Copying a list of constants or endpoints into prose | Link the authoritative source. | | Restating the heading in the first sentence | Add new information instead. | | Documenting how the code works today | Document the observable contract. |
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Nice3point
- Source: Nice3point/revit-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.