AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Caching

skill-nimadorostkar-claude-skills-collection-caching · by nimadorostkar

Use when adding or debugging a cache. Covers cache placement, invalidation strategies, stampede protection, TTL selection, and the consistency you are trading away.

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-nimadorostkar-claude-skills-collection-caching

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Caching? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Caching

Purpose

Add a cache with a clear invalidation story, or find out why the existing one is serving stale data. A cache is a second source of truth; introducing one is a consistency decision, not just a performance one.

When to Use

  • A read path is slow and the data is read far more often than it is written.
  • An upstream dependency is expensive, rate-limited, or unreliable.
  • Debugging stale reads, cache stampedes, or unexplained memory growth.

Capabilities

  • Cache placement: client, CDN, application, database.
  • Strategies: cache-aside, read-through, write-through, write-behind.
  • Invalidation: TTL, explicit, event-driven, versioned keys.
  • Stampede protection: locking, early recomputation, request coalescing.
  • Negative caching and hot-key mitigation.

Inputs

  • The read/write ratio and the cost of the uncached path.
  • How stale the data is allowed to be — in seconds, agreed with the product owner.
  • Cardinality of the key space and expected memory footprint.

Outputs

  • A key schema, a TTL, and an invalidation trigger for each cached entity.
  • Stampede protection on any key expensive enough to matter.
  • A hit-rate metric, because a cache you do not measure is a cache you do not understand.

Workflow

  1. Prove the need — Measure the uncached path first. A cache in front of a missing index is a permanent workaround for a five-minute fix.
  2. Decide the staleness budget — Ask what breaks if a user sees data five seconds old. The answer determines the TTL and whether you need explicit invalidation.
  3. Design the key — Include everything that varies the result: tenant, locale, permission scope. A key that omits a dimension leaks data between users.
  4. Choose invalidation — TTL alone for tolerant data. TTL plus explicit deletion on write for data that must be fresh. Versioned keys when deletion is unreliable.
  5. Protect against stampedes — When a hot key expires, every concurrent request misses simultaneously and hits the origin at once. Use a lock or single-flight.
  6. Measure — Hit rate, latency at each layer, and eviction rate. Falling hit rate with rising memory means the key space is too large.

Best Practices

  • Cache the expensive computation, not the whole response. Response-level caching multiplies the key space by every variant.
  • A cache key missing the tenant or the user's permission scope is a data-leak vulnerability, and it will be found by a customer.
  • Never cache with an unlimited TTL and rely on invalidation alone. Invalidation fails; the TTL is the safety net.
  • Set memory limits and an eviction policy explicitly (allkeys-lru). A Redis instance with no maxmemory will be killed by the OOM killer.
  • Do not cache errors indefinitely, but do cache "not found" briefly — otherwise a bad ID becomes an origin DoS.
  • Warm caches before cutting traffic over. A cold cache under full load is an outage.

Examples

Single-flight cache-aside, preventing a stampede:

async def get_pricing(tenant_id: str, sku: str) -> Pricing:
    key = f"pricing:v3:{tenant_id}:{sku}"

    if (cached := await redis.get(key)) is not None:
        return Pricing.model_validate_json(cached)

    # Only one caller per key computes; the rest wait for the result.
    lock_key = f"{key}:lock"
    if await redis.set(lock_key, "1", nx=True, ex=10):
        try:
            pricing = await compute_pricing(tenant_id, sku)      # expensive
            await redis.set(key, pricing.model_dump_json(), ex=300)
            return pricing
        finally:
            await redis.delete(lock_key)

    # Lost the race: wait briefly for the winner, then fall back to computing.
    for _ in range(20):
        await asyncio.sleep(0.05)
        if (cached := await redis.get(key)) is not None:
            return Pricing.model_validate_json(cached)

    return await compute_pricing(tenant_id, sku)

Notes

  • The v3 in the key is a schema version. When the cached shape changes, bump it — this invalidates the whole namespace atomically without a scan-and-delete.
  • Adding jitter to TTLs (ex=300 + random.randint(0, 60)) prevents a cohort of keys written together from expiring together.
  • A 95% hit rate sounds excellent, but if the 5% of misses are all on the single hottest key, the origin still sees the full load. Look at misses per key, not just the aggregate.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.