Install
$ agentstack add skill-nimadorostkar-claude-skills-collection-event-driven-architecture ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Event-Driven Architecture
Purpose
Design event flows that survive redelivery, reordering, and consumer failure — because all three will happen, and the broker's guarantees are weaker than most designs assume.
When to Use
- Introducing a message broker or queue.
- Designing event schemas that other teams will consume.
- Debugging duplicate processing, lost messages, or stuck consumers.
- Evaluating event sourcing for a subsystem.
Capabilities
- Event schema design and versioning.
- Delivery semantics: at-most-once, at-least-once, effectively-once.
- Idempotent consumer design.
- Ordering and partitioning strategy.
- Dead-letter queues, retry policies, and poison-message handling.
- Event sourcing and CQRS, and when the cost is justified.
Inputs
- The events the domain actually produces, in the domain's language.
- The broker and its real guarantees (not its marketing).
- Consumer requirements: ordering, latency, replay.
Outputs
- Versioned event schemas with a registry or equivalent.
- Consumers that are safe to run twice on the same message.
- Retry, DLQ, and replay procedures.
Workflow
- Name events in the past tense —
OrderPlaced,PaymentFailed. An event is a fact that happened, not a command to do something. - Design the payload for consumers you do not control — Include enough context that a consumer does not have to call back for the basics; do not include so much that every field change breaks someone.
- Assume at-least-once — Every consumer must be idempotent. Deduplicate on an event ID, or make the operation naturally idempotent.
- Partition for ordering — Ordering is guaranteed only within a partition. Key by the entity whose order matters (usually the aggregate ID).
- Handle poison messages — A message that always fails must land in a DLQ after N attempts, not retry forever and block the partition.
- Version from the start — Additive changes only; a new required field is a new event version.
Best Practices
- Exactly-once delivery does not exist across a network. Exactly-once processing is achievable with idempotent consumers, and that is where the effort belongs.
- Retry with exponential backoff and jitter. Fixed-interval retries from many consumers synchronize into a thundering herd.
- A consumer that retries a permanently failing message forever blocks every message behind it. Always cap attempts.
- Do not put large payloads on the bus. Publish a reference and let the consumer fetch — or accept the coupling knowingly.
- Events are a public contract. Removing a field breaks consumers you have never met.
- Log the event ID at every hop. Without it, tracing a lost message is archaeology.
Examples
Idempotent consumer keyed on event ID:
async def handle(event: Event, conn: Connection) -> None:
async with conn.transaction():
# Insert the marker first. If this event was already processed,
# the unique constraint rejects it and we skip the side effect.
inserted = await conn.execute(
"INSERT INTO processed_events (event_id, consumer) VALUES ($1, $2) "
"ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING RETURNING 1",
event.id, CONSUMER_NAME,
)
if not inserted:
logger.info("duplicate_event_skipped", extra={"event_id": event.id})
return
await apply_side_effect(event, conn) # same transaction as the marker
The marker and the side effect commit together. Redelivery is a no-op; a crash mid-transaction rolls back both and the message is redelivered cleanly.
Notes
- Kafka guarantees ordering per partition, not per topic. If two events for the same order land in different partitions, they can be processed out of order — key by order ID.
- A DLQ with no alerting and no replay tooling is a place where messages go to be forgotten. Build the replay path when you build the DLQ.
- Event sourcing is a large commitment: every schema change becomes a versioning problem for events you can never rewrite. Adopt it where the audit log is the product, not as a default persistence strategy.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: nimadorostkar
- Source: nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.