AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Nobrainer Writing

skill-nobrainer-tech-nobrainer-tech-skills-nobrainer-writing · by nobrainer-tech

Use when the owner says nb-write, nobrainer-writing, nobrainer-style, or nobrainer-human-like, or asks to draft, rewrite, compress, humanize, edit, or review user-facing prose such as a message, comment, document, README, report, summary, email, post, or release note; maximize useful information per word without dropping facts, evidence, caveats, voice, or required action.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
24 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-nobrainer-tech-nobrainer-tech-skills-nobrainer-writing

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-nobrainer-tech-nobrainer-tech-skills-nobrainer-writing)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 29d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Nobrainer Writing? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

NoBrainer Writing

Produce high-signal prose that helps a specific reader understand, decide or act. Treat the Pareto idea as a direction: preserve nearly all decision-relevant value while using far fewer words. It is not permission to remove evidence, conditions or nuance merely to hit an arbitrary ratio.

This skill owns prose quality. nobrainer-research owns missing or current external facts, nobrainer-decide owns consequential choices, and nobrainer-build owns behavioral code changes and repository integration. A small text-only edit can stay here. Do not invoke this skill for a one-sentence answer that is already clear, specific and complete.

Read [references/research.md](references/research.md) only when changing this protocol, auditing its rationale or comparing another writing method. Ordinary writing runs should not spend context on the research record.

Choose one mode

  • DRAFT: create prose from an established brief and verified source material.
  • COMPRESS: shorten existing prose while preserving its material meaning.
  • REWRITE: improve clarity, structure, voice and naturalness without changing

the factual contract.

  • REVIEW: identify only material prose defects and propose the smallest useful

correction; do not rewrite merely to express a preference.

If the user did not name a mode, infer the smallest one that satisfies the request. A request to "humanize" means REWRITE, not detector evasion or the injection of fake mistakes.

Freeze the content contract

Before drafting, resolve internally:

PURPOSE:
AUDIENCE:
USE_AFTER_READING:
ARTIFACT_AND_CHANNEL:
LANGUAGE_AND_TONE:
VOICE_SOURCE: supplied sample | project guide | inferred neutral | NONE
MUST_PRESERVE: facts | names | numbers | dates | links | quotations | terms |
               commands | conditions | uncertainty | caveats | requested action
SOURCE_STATUS: VERIFIED | PROVIDED | RESEARCH_REQUIRED | UNKNOWN
LENGTH_OR_FORMAT_CONSTRAINT:

Infer obvious fields from the request and current project. Ask one focused question only when the answer changes factual meaning, audience fit, material tone or safety. In a larger Ultra run, use the approved BUDDY brief and do not re-open settled requirements.

For COMPRESS and REWRITE, make a private meaning ledger before changing the text. Track every material claim, number, name, date, URL, quotation, attribution, identifier, command, negation, condition, uncertainty marker, caveat and call to action. Never add a source, experience, opinion, metric or detail that the input does not support. Route a material knowledge gap to nobrainer-research; do not cover it with fluent prose.

Write in six passes

  1. Outcome: state the answer, decision, result or requested action in the

first useful sentence. Keep background only when the reader needs it to interpret that outcome.

  1. Structure: group each idea once. Put decision-relevant information first.

Use headings, bullets or a table only when they make a real relationship easier to scan than short prose.

  1. Compression: remove throat-clearing, repeated points, self-reference,

empty transitions, generic summaries and decorative detail. Merge sentences only while the result remains easier to understand.

  1. Precision: prefer concrete nouns and precise verbs. Name the actor when it

clarifies responsibility. Use one term per concept and define necessary jargon for the actual audience.

  1. Voice: match an authentic supplied sample or project guide when one

exists. Otherwise use a direct, calm and natural neutral voice. Adapt tone to the reader's situation; technical, legal, error and safety text should not be made casual for entertainment.

  1. Integrity: compare the final text with the meaning ledger and the user's

requested action. Restore anything materially lost, and remove anything that cannot be traced to the input or a cited source.

Compress structure before swapping vocabulary. A shorter synonym cannot repair a paragraph with no clear purpose.

Anti-slop gate

Remove these patterns when they add no information:

  • praise, greetings, apologies or announcements before the actual point;
  • inflated significance, sales language, vague attribution and unsupported

certainty;

  • headings that repeat the next sentence, repetitive transitions, forced groups

of three and multiple labels that say the same thing;

  • fake candor, invented objections, rejected options no reader proposed,

dramatic fragments and generic optimistic endings;

  • abstract metaphors, buzzwords or modifiers standing in for a concrete fact;
  • formatting used as decoration, including excessive bold text, emoji and a

list where one sentence is clearer;

  • comments or documentation that restate visible code instead of explaining a

non-obvious reason, constraint, risk or consequence.

These are contextual signals, not a forbidden-word list. Keep a transition, technical term, passive construction, long sentence, repeated phrase or unusual punctuation when it is accurate, natural for the writer and useful to the reader. Professional grammar is not an AI tell.

Never simulate humanity with typos, missing punctuation, fabricated anecdotes, random slang, artificial sentence fragments or opinions the author did not express. Do not optimize for an AI detector or claim that prose is human-written.

Match the artifact

  • Reply, comment or status: outcome first, then only decisive evidence,

blocker and next action.

  • Email or request: purpose, essential context, one clear ask and timing when

material.

  • README or instructions: purpose, prerequisites, shortest successful path,

verification and only likely failure recovery.

  • Report or decision note: answer, verified facts, inference or trade-off,

decision and next action. Keep fact and inference visibly distinct.

  • Long-form content: thesis, evidence and implications in a coherent arc.

Concision removes repetition; it does not flatten a real argument into notes.

  • Code comment: explain why, invariant, risk or surprising consequence.

Delete comments that merely translate the code into English.

  • Marketing or social copy: audience problem, concrete value or proof and one

honest action. Do not manufacture urgency, authority or transformation.

Quality gate

Before returning the text, require:

PURPOSE_CLEAR: PASS | FAIL
ANSWER_OR_ACTION_FRONT_LOADED: PASS | NOT_APPLICABLE | FAIL
MEANING_PRESERVED: PASS | NOT_APPLICABLE | FAIL
CLAIMS_TRACEABLE: PASS | NOT_APPLICABLE | FAIL
CAVEATS_AND_CONDITIONS_PRESERVED: PASS | NOT_APPLICABLE | FAIL
VOICE_AND_AUDIENCE_FIT: PASS | FAIL
VALUE_DENSITY: PASS | FAIL
SCAN_AND_ACCESSIBILITY: PASS | NOT_APPLICABLE | FAIL

VALUE_DENSITY passes when every sentence adds a distinct fact, implication, instruction, decision, transition or intentional voice effect. Ask of each sentence: if it disappears, does meaning, evidence, tone or action materially change? If not, cut it.

A lower word count is diagnostic, not acceptance. Do not over-compress a short source, remove a necessary example, collapse separate conditions or hide risk. When accessibility matters, preserve descriptive headings, meaningful link text, expanded acronyms and enough context to understand the text out of layout.

Return the result

Return only the finished prose by default. Do not surround a two-line answer with a process report. When the owner asks for an audit, comparison or measured compression, add a compact block after the result:

MODE:
WORDS: before -> after | NOT_MEASURED
MATERIAL_CHANGES:
PRESERVED_CONTRACT:
UNVERIFIED_OR_INPUT_REQUIRED:

Return INPUT_REQUIRED instead of drafting when a missing fact, source, voice sample or constraint would force invention or materially change the result.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.