Install
$ agentstack add skill-npbuilds-skill-library-problem-decomposition ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Problem Decomposition — Director
A diagnosed problem is rarely atomic. This director realizes six-eyes' Phase 3 (Decompose): it selects the right root-cause method for the problem's typology and stakes, tags each piece as root vs. symptom, and grounds the work in Polya's problem-solving heuristics. The goal is a set of atomic, root-tagged claims that downstream reframing and audit can operate on cleanly.
Decomposition partners with the research domain's claim-decomposer (cross-domain) for atomic-claim extraction; this director focuses on root-cause structure — which split is causal, which is cosmetic.
Routing Table
| Child skill | Use when | Output | |---|---|---| | root-vs-symptom-tagger | You need to pick a root-cause method (5 Whys / Fishbone / dependency map / Current Reality Tree) and tag each part root vs. symptom | Method choice + per-claim root/symptom tags | | polya-method | You need the heuristic basis for understand → plan → execute → look-back, or specialize/generalize moves | Reference: Polya's How to Solve It catalog |
Routing Logic
- Take the typology tag from
problem-diagnosis. It selects the method: dependency mapping for
mess, Current Reality Tree for wicked, 5 Whys / Fishbone for well- or ill-defined. root-vs-symptom-tagger performs this selection.
- Pull
polya-methodwhen the decomposition stalls — its specialize/generalize operations and
the "understand the problem" step often unstick a tangled statement.
- If decomposition yields 15+ atomic claims, hand back to
six-eyesto ask the user to
prioritize before continuing.
Scope Boundaries
- In scope: selecting a decomposition method, root vs. symptom tagging, Polya heuristics.
- Out of scope: classifying the problem (→
problem-diagnosis), generating alternative
formulations (→ problem-reframing).
- Cross-domain: atomic-claim extraction proper is
research/claim-decomposer; this director
routes to it via the orchestrator rather than duplicating it.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: npbuilds
- Source: npbuilds/skill-library
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://skill-library-prod.web.app/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.