AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Pipeline Health Report

skill-npow-claude-skills-pipeline-health-report · by npow

Use when checking data pipeline health, workflow status, Maestro failures, or generating a daily pipeline report. Trigger phrases: pipeline health, workflow status, data pipeline report, maestro health, pipeline check, are my workflows healthy.

No reviews yet
0 installs
14 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-npow-claude-skills-pipeline-health-report

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Pipeline Health Report? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Pipeline Health Report

Produce an actionable daily health report for Maestro data workflows using Kragle MCP tools.

Configuration

See [_shared/report-config.md](../_shared/report-config.md) for the standard config resolution pattern.

Config schema (~/.claude/skills/pipeline-health-report/config.json):

  • owner: workflow owner pattern string (e.g., data.eng.myteam)
  • workflow_id_pattern: wildcard pattern string (e.g., DSE.BILLING.*)
  • workflow_ids: list of explicit workflow ID strings
  • cluster: "prod" or "sandbox" (default: "prod")
  • limit: max workflows to check (default: 50)

Required scope: at least one of owner, workflow_id_pattern, or workflow_ids.

Arguments

Parse from user input, falling back to config.json:

  • owner: workflow owner pattern — e.g. data.eng.*
  • workflowidpattern: wildcard pattern — e.g. DSE.BILLING.*
  • workflow_ids: explicit list of workflow IDs to check
  • cluster: prod | sandbox (default: prod — never default to sandbox for health reports)
  • limit: max workflows to check (default: 50)

Workflow

  1. Discover workflows. Use the configured scope to find workflows:
  • If workflow_ids is set: skip search, check each ID directly via get_latest_instance
  • If workflow_id_pattern is set: call search_workflows with workflow_id_pattern and cluster=prod
  • If owner is set: call search_workflows with owner and cluster=prod
  • If none is set and no config.json: ask the user once, then save their answer to config.json for future runs
  1. Check every workflow. For EACH workflow returned, call get_latest_instance with cluster=prod. Record status: SUCCEEDED, FAILED, IN_PROGRESS, or no recent instance.
  1. Drill into failures. For every FAILED instance, call get_instance_failures with cluster=prod. Extract: step_id, attempt number, status, and instance link. This step is MANDATORY — never report a failure without step-level detail.
  1. Check running durations. For every IN_PROGRESS instance, call get_instance_summary with cluster=prod. Flag any instance running longer than 2 hours as "long-running."
  1. Generate report. Output markdown with these sections in order:
## Pipeline Health Report — {date}
Cluster: {cluster} | Owner filter: {owner or "all"} | Workflows checked: {N}

### Summary
- Failed: {count} | In Progress: {count} | Succeeded: {count} | No Recent Run: {count}

### Failed Workflows
(For each: workflow_id, failed step, error summary, instance link)

### Long-Running Workflows
(For each: workflow_id, duration so far, instance link)

### In Progress
(Compact list: workflow_id, start time)

### Recently Succeeded
(Compact table: workflow_id, last success time)
  1. Deliver as HTML. Follow the shared HTML delivery pattern in [_shared/html-delivery.md](../_shared/html-delivery.md). Report name: pipeline-health. TLDR includes workflows checked, failure count, and long-running instances.
  1. Terminate. Report is complete when all sections are populated (even if a section says "None").

Design Principles

  1. Team-level only. Aggregate to team level — it is the right granularity for a periodic digest. Individual-level detail (commits per person, PR count per author) is too noisy for a team report.
  2. Deterministic math first, LLM narrates only. All classification (severity, flaky vs broken, pass/fail) must be computed deterministically from data. The LLM writes prose around the numbers but never assigns severity or makes classification judgments.
  3. Pair metrics with counter-metrics. Never report velocity without stability. If showing deploy frequency, also show change failure rate. If showing PR throughput, also show rework rate.

Golden Rules

  1. Always cluster=prod. Every Kragle MCP call passes cluster="prod" unless the user explicitly says sandbox. Sandbox workflows are tests, not production health.
  2. Never skip getinstancefailures. Every FAILED workflow gets a getinstancefailures call. "Workflow X failed" without step detail is useless.
  3. Check ALL workflows, not a sample. If search_workflows returns 50 results and you set limit=50, consider whether there are more. Increase limit or paginate.
  4. Failures first. Report sections are ordered by severity. Failures at top, succeeded at bottom.
  5. Include links. Every failed or in-progress workflow includes its instance_link from the API response. The reader must be able to click through without additional lookups.
  6. "All clear" is still a report. When everything succeeded, produce the full report structure with counts and timestamps. One sentence is not a report.
  7. No invented data. Every number in the report comes from a Kragle API response. Never estimate or infer workflow counts.

Anti-Rationalization Counter-Table

| Excuse | Reality | |---|---| | "I spot-checked a few workflows and they look fine." | Check ALL workflows. A single missed failure defeats the purpose of the report. | | "The workflow failed but I didn't call getinstancefailures because the status says it all." | FAILED status tells you nothing actionable. The stepid and error from getinstancefailures is what the on-call needs. Call it. | | "I'll skip the sandbox/prod parameter since the default is fine." | The Kragle default is sandbox. Your report will silently cover test workflows. Always pass cluster="prod" explicitly. | | "Everything succeeded so there's nothing to report." | The report IS the evidence. Write the full structure with counts and timestamps. | | "There are too many workflows to check individually." | Increase the limit parameter. The report must cover the full set, not a sample. | | "The instance link wasn't in the response." | It is — check the instancelink field in getlatestinstance and getinstancefailures responses. |

Termination Labels

| Label | Meaning | |---|---| | report_complete | All workflows checked, all sections populated, failures have step-level detail | | report_partial | Some workflows checked but API errors prevented full coverage — note which were skipped | | no_workflows_found | search_workflows returned empty — owner pattern may be wrong | | api_error | Kragle API unreachable or returning errors — report what was gathered before failure |

Self-Review Checklist

Before delivering the report, verify:

  • [ ] Every Kragle call used cluster="prod" (or user-specified cluster)
  • [ ] Total workflows in Summary matches count from search_workflows
  • [ ] Every FAILED workflow has getinstancefailures output (step_id + link)
  • [ ] Every INPROGRESS workflow has duration from getinstance_summary
  • [ ] Failed section appears before Succeeded section
  • [ ] Instance links are present for all failed and in-progress workflows
  • [ ] Report has a date header and owner filter noted
  • [ ] HTML version uploaded to S3 with commuter link (unless --no-html or upload failed with noted fallback)
  • [ ] Slack/chat delivery uses TLDR + link, not the full report

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.