Install
$ agentstack add skill-olgaiv39-claude-oss-skills-oss-plan ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
oss-plan
Produce an execution plan that keeps the project runnable after every meaningful step. Do not write implementation code while using this skill.
Activate when
- Starting a new feature or a non-trivial change
- Scope, sequencing, or trust boundaries are unclear
- A change will touch multiple files or an external system
Do not activate when
- The change is a one-line fix with obvious validation -> use
implement-minimal - The repository does not exist yet -> use
oss-bootstrap - You are debugging a failure -> use
test-and-debug
Required inputs
- The feature or change request
- Access to the repository to inspect status and conventions
- Any external systems the feature must touch
Low-resource policy
Read the first of these that exists, then follow it:
${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}/.claude/shared/LOW_RESOURCE.md$HOME/.claude/shared/LOW_RESOURCE.md
If neither exists, apply this fallback: run one expensive command at a time, prefer the narrowest validation, disable watch mode, reuse existing environments, and run full validation only at a milestone boundary. Do not scan the whole filesystem to locate the policy.
Context-efficiency policy
Read the first of these that exists, then follow it:
${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR}/.claude/shared/CONTEXT_EFFICIENCY.md$HOME/.claude/shared/CONTEXT_EFFICIENCY.md
If neither exists, apply this fallback: select files before reading; use targeted searches and bounded ranges; do not preload references; do not reread unchanged files; finish one atomic increment and stop; create a compact handoff before context is exhausted.
Facts that must not be assumed
- The test runner, package manager, or build tool
- That an external API, wallet, or MCP tool is available offline
- That existing tests pass right now
- The deployment target
Separate confirmed facts from assumptions and label every assumption.
Preflight
git status --shortandgit log --oneline -5for current stategit diff --statfor uncommitted work in progress- Identify project conventions ->
[references/execution-planning.md](references/execution-planning.md)
- Identify external systems and trust boundaries ->
[references/trust-boundaries.md](references/trust-boundaries.md)
Workflow
- Inspect current status and recent diff
- Discover project conventions and existing validation commands
- Identify the narrowest end-to-end path that delivers observable value
- Separate confirmed requirements from assumptions
- Map external systems, inputs, and trust boundaries
- Define targeted validation for each increment
- Mark which actions are locally expensive and schedule them at milestones
- Identify when another skill is required (dependency-review, implement-minimal,
test-and-debug, release-deploy)
- Produce the plan using
[templates/execution-plan.md](templates/execution-plan.md)
- Stop after the plan
Decision branches
- The slice needs a new dependency -> note it and require
dependency-review
before implementation, do not assume approval
- The slice depends on an offline external system -> plan a mock boundary and
mark the live path as unvalidated
- Acceptance cannot be validated cheaply -> narrow the slice until it can
- The change is larger than one vertical slice -> split into sequenced slices,
each runnable on its own
Validation escalation
For each increment, specify the smallest check that proves it:
single test or command
related test file
changed-file lint or typecheck
related integration path
full suite only at the milestone that ends the plan
Never plan a full-suite run after every edit.
Stop conditions
- Requirements remain contradictory after one clarification pass
- The narrowest slice still cannot be validated locally
- The plan would require an unavailable external system with no mock
Human review boundaries
- Trust-boundary decisions involving auth, wallets, or user data
- Any assumption that changes scope materially
- Deployment target selection
Final report
Produce the plan in the exact section order of [templates/execution-plan.md](templates/execution-plan.md). Present it for review and stop; implementation happens under implement-minimal.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: olgaiv39
- Source: olgaiv39/claude-oss-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.