AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Release Notes

skill-omexit-claude-skills-pack-release-notes · by OmexIT

Draft release notes from a set of PRs/commits or a feature description. Produces user-facing notes, internal notes, known issues, and rollout steps. Triggers: "release notes", "changelog", "what shipped".

No reviews yet
0 installs
18 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-omexit-claude-skills-pack-release-notes

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Release Notes? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Release notes

Inputs

  • Version number or date range
  • List of merged PRs or commit range (or a summary of what shipped)
  • Audience: external users, internal stakeholders, or both

How I'll think about this

  1. Audience-first writing: External users care about what changed for them. Internal teams care about what might break, what to monitor, and what to tell support. Write different sections for different readers.
  2. Outcomes over implementation: "You can now export reports as PDF" not "Added PDFExportService with async rendering pipeline." Users don't care how — they care what and why.
  3. Breaking changes need migration paths: Every breaking change must include: what broke, who's affected, what to do about it, and a timeline. Never just say "Breaking: API v2 removed."
  4. Be honest about known issues: Shipping with known issues is fine. Shipping without telling anyone is not.
  5. Group by impact: Highlights (big features) → Improvements (enhancements) → Fixes (bugs) → Breaking changes. Most readers stop after highlights.

Anti-patterns to flag

  • Jargon-heavy notes that only engineers understand
  • "Various bug fixes and improvements" (uninformative)
  • Breaking changes buried in a list without migration guidance
  • Missing rollback/rollforward instructions for operators
  • No mention of monitoring or alerts for high-risk changes

Quality bar

  • A non-technical user can understand the highlights section
  • Breaking changes include specific migration instructions
  • Internal operations section has rollback plan and monitoring guidance
  • Known issues are listed with workarounds (if any)
  • Links to PRs, dashboards, and runbooks are included for internal audience

Workflow context

  • Typically follows: code-review:code-review (official plugin), /test-plan
  • Feeds into: /stakeholder-update, customer communications
  • Related: /experiment-design (staged rollout notes), /incident-response (if rollout causes issues)

Output

Fill templates/release-notes.md.

Output contract

produces:
  - type: "release-notes"
    format: "markdown"
    path: "claudedocs/-release-notes.md"
    sections: [highlights, breaking_changes, migration, rollback]

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.