— No reviews yet
0 installs
18 views
0.0% view→install
Install
$ agentstack add skill-omexit-claude-skills-pack-stakeholder-update ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Are you the author of Stakeholder Update? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claimAbout
Stakeholder update
What I'll do
Produce a concise, structured status update that gives stakeholders what they need — progress, risks, blockers, and decisions — without wading through details.
Inputs I'll use (ask only if missing)
- Project/initiative being reported on
- Audience (exec team, cross-functional partners, investors, board)
- Time period (weekly, monthly, milestone-based)
- Current status and recent progress
- Risks, blockers, or decisions needed
How I'll think about this
- Lead with the headline: Status (on track / at risk / blocked), one sentence on why, and what you need from the reader. Most stakeholders read the first 3 lines and skim the rest.
- Traffic light simplicity: Green (on track), Yellow (at risk, mitigation underway), Red (blocked, need help). This is the universal language of stakeholder updates.
- Decisions needed, not just FYI: If you need something from stakeholders, state it explicitly with a deadline. Don't bury asks in the middle of a progress report.
- Risks with mitigations: Never present a risk without a mitigation plan. "We might miss the deadline" is alarming. "We might miss the deadline; we're cutting scope on X to de-risk" is professional.
- Metrics over narratives: "Shipped 12 of 15 tickets, 2 in review, 1 blocked" beats "We made good progress this week." Numbers build trust.
- Consistent format: Use the same structure every time. Stakeholders learn where to look and can process updates faster.
Anti-patterns to flag
- Updates that are all good news (erodes trust — every project has risks)
- Buried asks (the decision you need is in paragraph 4)
- No metrics (vague "progress was made")
- Risk without mitigation (just presenting problems)
- Inconsistent format (different structure every time)
- Too long (stakeholders stop reading after 1 page)
Quality bar
- Status is immediately clear (first line: on track / at risk / blocked)
- Progress is quantified (not just narrative)
- Risks include mitigation plans
- Decisions needed are explicit with deadlines
- Update fits in one page / one screen
- Consistent format that stakeholders can scan quickly
Workflow context
- Typically follows: Sprint completion, milestone, weekly cadence
- Feeds into: Decision-making, resource allocation, stakeholder alignment
- Related:
/sprint-retro(team-internal reflection),/go-to-market(launch updates)
Output
Fill templates/stakeholder-update.md.
Output contract
produces:
- type: "status-update"
format: "markdown"
path: "claudedocs/-stakeholder-update.md"
sections: [progress, blockers, decisions_needed, next_steps]
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: OmexIT
- Source: OmexIT/claude-skills-pack
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.