Install
$ agentstack add skill-omnijeff-claude-skills-gh-issue-writer ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
GitHub Issue Writer
Write clear, well-structured GitHub issues that give implementers everything they need to understand, build, and verify the work.
Issue structure
Every issue must include these sections in order:
1. Background (if not obvious)
One or two paragraphs of context. What is the current state? Why does this matter? What exists already that is relevant?
2. Problem / Goal
What is broken or missing? State it plainly. One clear sentence if possible.
3. Proposed approach (for features/changes)
How should it be solved? Be specific enough to guide implementation but not so prescriptive that it removes judgment. Include:
- Architecture decisions that have been agreed upon
- Key components or interfaces to implement
- Configuration/env vars if applicable
- What is explicitly out of scope
4. Definition of done
A checkbox list. Each item is a concrete, verifiable condition. Not vague ("it works") but specific ("POST /api/items returns 201 and the item appears in the watchlist").
5. Test plan
A checkbox list covering:
- Unit tests: mock dependencies, test logic in isolation
- Integration tests: real services, verify system behavior end-to-end
- E2E tests: browser/Playwright tests where applicable (these are the gold standard)
- Manual verification: steps a human should check that automation can't easily cover
Quality bar
- Every claim in the issue should be accurate. If uncertain, say so.
- Avoid wording confusion — if a section conflates two different concepts, rewrite it.
- Use precise language. "The discovery scheduler" not "it".
- Link to related issues when they exist.
- The issue should be useful to an implementer who has no prior context.
Anti-patterns to avoid
- Vague acceptance criteria ("it should work well")
- Missing test plan or test plan that only covers happy path
- Conflating different types of sources, services, or approaches without distinguishing them
- Proposing paid-API-only solutions without considering free alternatives
- Mentioning limits that don't apply (e.g. "no quota" for headless browsers vs. API rate limits)
Workflow
- Gather requirements from the user — ask clarifying questions if the scope is unclear
- Draft the issue following the structure above
- Review for coherence: does each section follow logically from the previous?
- Create with
gh issue create --title "..." --body-file /tmp/issue_body.md
- Write the body to a temp file first to avoid shell escaping issues
- Share the URL with the user
Tips
- Write body content to
/tmp/issue_body.mdthen use--body-file— never inline the body as a shell argument - Use
gh issue edit --body-file /tmp/issue_body.mdto rewrite an existing issue - Checkbox syntax in GitHub markdown:
- [ ] item - Link related issues: "Depends on #10" or "Part of #22"
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: OmniJeff
- Source: OmniJeff/claude-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.