Install
$ agentstack add skill-on-deck-society-love-stack-parallel-debugging ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Parallel Debugging
When activated, help the user debug a reported issue by pursuing multiple hypotheses in parallel instead of the traditional linear "try one thing, see if it works" loop.
The Process
- Clarify the symptom: Ask for the exact behavior observed, the expected behavior, and the reproduction steps. Do not skip this. A vague symptom makes parallel debugging impossible because you can't score evidence against hypotheses.
- Generate 3-5 hypotheses: Before touching code, list the possible causes. Each hypothesis should be a concrete, testable claim. Examples:
- "The API returns stale data because the cache TTL is longer than we think."
- "The race condition fires when two users submit within the same 100ms window."
- "The migration didn't run in production but did in staging."
- For each hypothesis, identify a cheap test: What's the single fastest check that would either rule this in or rule it out? A log statement, a database query, a git log, a test repro.
- Run all tests in parallel: Execute the cheap tests for every hypothesis before drawing conclusions. Do not pick a favorite and chase it to the end.
- Score the evidence: After all tests return, rank hypotheses by how well the evidence supports them. Eliminate the disproven ones.
- Narrow and repeat if needed: If no hypothesis is clearly correct, generate new ones based on what you learned.
Anti-patterns to Avoid
- Fixating on the first hypothesis and ignoring contradicting evidence
- Running tests sequentially when they're independent
- Skipping the clarification step because you "already know" what's wrong
- Confirming a hypothesis without also running tests that would disprove it
Output
For each debugging session, produce:
- The stated symptom and reproduction
- The 3-5 hypotheses considered
- The test and result for each
- The conclusion with evidence references
- The fix (or the next round of hypotheses if not yet resolved)
When to Invoke
Invoke when the user says: "debug this", "I can't figure out why X is happening", "something is broken and I don't know what", "help me troubleshoot", or presents an unexpected behavior that isn't obvious from the code alone.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: on-deck-society
- Source: on-deck-society/love-stack
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.