Install
$ agentstack add skill-onehorizonai-skills-one-roadmap-suggestions ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Roadmap Suggestions
Review a One Horizon workspace and suggest practical improvements to roadmap structure, sequencing, and scope.
Core rules
- Default to suggestions only. Do not mutate roadmap items unless the user explicitly asks you to apply changes.
- Ground every recommendation in current workspace data, not generic startup advice.
- Prefer 3-5 well-supported suggestions over an exhaustive dump unless the user asks for a full audit.
- If the roadmap is sparse, use planned work, blockers, bugs, and taxonomy to propose a starter roadmap.
- Do not invent missing initiatives from weak signals. If the evidence is thin, label it as a hypothesis.
- Do not recommend a work-type conversion unless you can explain why the current type is wrong and which type fits better.
Gather context
- Call
list-initiativeswith active statuses andincludeHierarchy: true. - Call
list-planned-workwithincludeInitiatives: true. - Call
list-bugsfor active bugs when defect pressure may imply missing roadmap investment. - Call
list-blockerswithincludeInitiatives: true. - Call
list-taxonomywhen the workspace uses goals, products, companies, or components, or when category-like initiatives may really be taxonomy. - If a recommendation depends on a specific item, call
get-task-detailsbefore suggesting a reframe. - Use
search-taskswhen you need to confirm a repeated theme across the workspace.
Decision rubric
Before giving a recommendation, classify it into exactly one of these buckets:
Hierarchy: parent-child reshaping, merge, dedupe, or split.Work type: initiative vs taxonomy vs ongoing work vs bug vs feature request vs Todo.Coverage: missing roadmap investment or missing foundational work.Sequencing: roadmap order is likely wrong or incomplete.Tagging: taxonomy is missing or misused.
Only surface a recommendation when at least one of these is true:
- There are at least 2 supporting signals across initiatives, planned work, blockers, bugs, or taxonomy.
- There is 1 strong signal from
get-task-detailsthat clearly contradicts the current roadmap shape. - The same gap or mismatch appears in multiple related tasks.
Heuristics
Hierarchy
- Suggest parent and child reshaping when there are flat lists of tightly related initiatives, mismatched children, or child items that are really standalone efforts.
- Suggest merging or deduplicating initiatives with overlapping titles, scope, or outcomes.
- Suggest splitting initiatives that bundle multiple products, goals, or delivery tracks.
Work type
- Suggest taxonomy when the item behaves like a reusable label or grouping concept such as a product area, customer, market, or goal rather than a deliverable.
- Suggest ongoing work when the item is recurring and owner-driven with no clear end state.
- Suggest a bug or feature request when the item is really issue intake rather than planned roadmap work.
- Suggest a Todo only for small private follow-up work, not roadmap items.
Coverage and maturity
- Suggest missing initiatives when blockers, bugs, or planned work cluster around the same gap.
- Suggest sequencing changes when later work depends on missing foundations such as auth, testing, onboarding, or integrations.
- Call out where the roadmap is under-tagged or under-grouped relative to existing taxonomy.
Response shape
Summary: 2-4 sentences on the current roadmap quality, maturity, and biggest pattern.Suggestions: for each recommendation, use this format:Type: one bucket from the decision rubricChange: the exact change to makeEvidence: the concrete tasks, blockers, bugs, taxonomy, or hierarchy pattern that support itWhy: why this improves the roadmapConfidence:High,Medium, orLowMissing initiatives: include only when there are clear gaps, with concrete initiative titles.Hypotheses: include only low-confidence ideas that may be useful but are not well supported yet.Next step: ask whether to apply any subset using One Horizon tools.
Quality bar
- Be direct. Do not pad the answer with roadmap theory.
- Prefer specific initiative titles over abstract categories.
- If the workspace already looks coherent, say so and suggest only the smallest useful changes.
- If there is not enough evidence for a confident recommendation, say what is missing.
If the user wants changes applied
- Use
update-initiativefor hierarchy, title, status, team, assignee, or taxonomy changes. - Use
create-initiativefor new roadmap items. - Use
create-todoonly when the recommendation is really a private follow-up. - Add a task comment when you materially reframe an existing initiative so the reasoning is visible.
- Never rewrite descriptions just to log progress.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: onehorizonai
- Source: onehorizonai/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.