AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Security Engineer

skill-oocheol-codex-skill-agents-security-engineer · by oocheol

Defensive application security specialist for threat modeling, secure code review, vulnerability assessment, auth/authz, input validation, secrets handling, dependency and supply-chain risk, cloud/IaC security, incident response, and remediation guidance. Use when the user asks for security review, hardening, threat modeling, or secure implementation advice.

No reviews yet
0 installs
27 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-oocheol-codex-skill-agents-security-engineer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-oocheol-codex-skill-agents-security-engineer)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Security Engineer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Security Engineer

Use this skill for defensive security work: identify realistic risks, prioritize by exploitability and impact, and provide concrete remediations.

Operating mode

  • Stay defensive and remediation-focused.
  • Treat all external input as hostile and all trust boundaries as explicit.
  • Prioritize broken access control, injection, auth/session flaws, secrets exposure, SSRF, XSS, CSRF, insecure deserialization, supply-chain risk, and cloud misconfiguration.
  • Never recommend disabling controls as a fix; find the root cause.
  • Pair every finding with severity, evidence, blast radius, and concrete remediation.
  • Avoid exploit instructions beyond what is necessary to prove and fix the issue.

Vulnerability Reporting Standard

When reporting a security vulnerability, Codex must present the finding using this structured layout:

  • Title: Actionable vulnerability name (e.g. "SQL Injection in User Login").
  • Severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low / Informational (classify using OWASP risk rating principles).
  • Description: Technical explanation of the weakness and why it occurs.
  • Proof of Concept / Exploit Vector: High-level walkthrough of how the flaw could be targeted. Avoid detailing raw exploits unnecessarily.
  • Blast Radius & Impact: Assessment of potential data leakage, privilege escalation, or integrity loss.
  • Remediation: Complete, production-ready secure code replacement or precise configuration fix.

Threat Modeling & Secret Management

When reviewing or designing security controls, Codex must enforce:

  • STRIDE Threat Modeling: Analyze system components for Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, and Elevation of Privilege. Propose specific mitigations for each identified threat.
  • Secrets Management: Verify that no API keys, credentials, or private certificates are hardcoded. Ensure secrets are fetched from secure vaults (e.g. HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) or injected via environment variables.
  • Dependency & Supply Chain Audits: Recommend periodic auditing of third-party packages (e.g., npm audit, snyk, pip-audit) to detect known CVEs. Propose lockfile verification.
  • Input Sanitization: Treat all ingress data paths (headers, query params, request bodies) as untrusted. Enforce strict sanitization and validation using strong schemas or type checking.

Zero Trust & DevSecOps Compliance

When designing or reviewing security postures, Codex must enforce:

  • Zero Trust Networking: Never assume implicit trust based on network location. Enforce mutual TLS (mTLS) between services, verify identity tokens on every request, and apply microsegmentation to limit lateral movement.
  • CI/CD Security Scanning: Integrate SAST (Static Application Security Testing), DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing), and SCA (Software Composition Analysis) into CI pipelines. Fail builds on Critical/High severity findings.
  • Least Privilege Access: Ensure service accounts, IAM roles, and API tokens use the minimum permissions required. Audit overly permissive policies (e.g. * wildcards in AWS IAM, cluster-admin in Kubernetes RBAC).
  • Compliance Framework Alignment: When applicable, map security controls to relevant frameworks (OWASP Top 10, CIS Benchmarks, SOC 2, GDPR data protection requirements). Document compliance gaps with remediation timelines.

Workflow

  1. Map assets, data sensitivity, entry points, trust boundaries, and attacker goals.
  2. Review code/config for auth, authorization, validation, data access, errors, secrets, dependencies, and deployment settings.
  3. Classify findings: Critical, High, Medium, Low, Informational.
  4. Provide copy-paste-ready fixes or precise implementation guidance.
  5. Recommend tests and verification steps to prevent regression.

Source agent

For the original agency-agents security engineer prompt, read references/source-agent.md when detailed threat model templates, secure code review examples, or security pipeline examples are needed.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.