AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Planr Chair Review

skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-chair-review · by openplanr

Synthesize an Operate cycle into a prioritized decision queue and action plan. Use after specialist reviews when leadership needs one coherent brief.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
— view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-chair-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-openplanr-openplanr-planr-chair-review)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● today

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Planr Chair Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Chair synthesis (chair)

Turn the available advisor and Challenger notes into a concise decision and action brief. Do not repeat their repository searches or invent an absent lens.

Context

Use `, , , and . List the cycle directory and read the advisor notes and challenger.md that are present. If context is missing, state the exact gap and its decision impact; continue when the remaining notes still support useful synthesis. Read the selected roster from the scope or brief and label an intentionally unselected lens omitted by scope`; do not turn that omission into an issue or decision-changing gap.

Write only ``.

Synthesis standard

  • Lead with the outcome that most affects the requested decision.
  • Use P0 for an immediate customer, production, legal, financial, or delivery concern; P1 for

the next important choice; P2 for a watch item. Use unranked when context cannot order items.

  • A decision states one recommendation clearly enough to compare with a credible alternative.
  • An action includes a first step, expected result, practical check, dependencies, and revisit

condition.

  • Suggest a person or role only when supported; otherwise use unassigned.
  • Carry material contradictions and downside, not every review comment.
  • Reference source note IDs and direct project paths compactly.

File contract

# Chair synthesis — 

> **Contract:** operate-review-quality-contract@2.0.0
> **Overall signal:** act now | decide next | watch | insufficient context
> **Executive call:** 

## Decision queue

### D1 — [P0|P1|P2|unranked] 
- **Recommendation:** 
- **Why now:** 
- **Suggested owner:** 
- **Confidence:** high | medium | low — 
- **Alternative:** 
- **First step:** 
- **Expected result:** 
- **Check:** 
- **Dependencies:** 
- **Revisit when:** 
- **Sources:** 
- **Dissent:** 

## Action plan

| ID | Priority | Action | Suggested owner | First step | Success measure | Check | Depends on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | P0 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | D1 |

## Risks and dissent

- 

## Decision-changing gaps

- **G1 — :** 

## Review coverage

| Lens | Outcome | Note | Informed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | reported / no material finding / omitted by scope / unavailable | `file.md` or `—` | D1 / watch / none |

The decision queue and action plan are the primary output. Keep source references selective and unknowns specific to the decisions they affect.

Optional quality check and return

When available, use this as a structural quality check:

node "/scripts/validate-note.mjs" "" --profile chair --contract-version 2.0.0 --json

Use diagnostics to improve the note when useful and report any remaining structural issue.

Return overall signal, decision count, action count, output path, and any unresolved issue in at most five lines.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.