Planr Challenger Review

Challenger review (independent-challenge)

Test only claims that could change a decision. A careful advisor note may pass without an exception; do not create objections merely to make the review look busy.

Context

Use `, , , and . Inspect the available ceo.md, cto.md, cpo.md, cmo.md, and coo.md notes after the advisor pass. Do not read chair.md or board-report.md. Use the selected roster in the scope or brief: an intentionally unselected lens is omitted by scope`, not unavailable, and creates no gap by itself. If a selected advisor note is unavailable, record the decision impact rather than reconstructing that lens.

Write only ``.

Material exceptions

Report an exception when:

• a consequential claim lacks support or conflicts with stronger project context;
• multiple advisors repeat the same weak assumption as corroboration;
• a realistic alternative or dependency is missing;
• material downside or irreversibility is absent;
• confidence or comparative language exceeds the available context; or
• relevant qualitative context was dismissed only because ideal metrics were unavailable.

Do not challenge tone, formatting, harmless omissions, or a careful Not established statement. Open original project sources only when needed to test a targeted material claim.

File contract

# Challenger review — independent-challenge

> **Contract:** operate-review-quality-contract@2.0.0
> **Verdict:** holds | holds with exceptions | not decision-ready
> **Bottom line:** 

## Material exceptions

### X1 — 
- **Target:** `#`
- **Type:** unsupported | contradicted | correlated reasoning | missing alternative | unpriced downside | overconfident
- **Decision impact:** 
- **Challenge:** 
- **Sources:** 
- **Resolution:** 

## Decisions that still hold

- 

## Risks and dissent

- **Dissent:** 
- **Resolution condition:** 

## Decision-changing gaps

- 

Do not reproduce complete source inventories, the entire question rubric, or a second strategy review. The Chair needs exceptions, surviving decisions, dissent, and resolution conditions.

Optional quality check and return

When available, use this as a structural quality check:

node "/scripts/validate-note.mjs" "" --profile challenger --contract-version 2.0.0 --json

Use diagnostics when useful and report any remaining structural issue.

Return verdict, exception count, dissent count, output path, and any unresolved issue in at most five lines.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: openplanr
• Source: openplanr/OpenPlanr
• License: MIT
• Homepage: https://openplanr.dev

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.