Install
$ agentstack add skill-openstack-k8s-operators-devskills-analyze-must-gather ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Analyze must-gather
General rules
- If something prevents you from taking meaningful steps forward, stop and report the problem to the user.
- Consider the must-gather report read-only. Do not edit anything in it.
- Even if you have tools like
ocorsshavailable, don't do direct cluster examination during the analysis. Stick to just analyzing the files in the must-gather report. If you find that it would be useful to have some more information, which is missing from the report but could be obtained by directly inspecting OpenShift or OpenStack or the underlying servers, highlight that in your analysis.
- Match LLM context usage with the severity of the issue being investigated. Investigate serious problems first. If a problem looks serious, feel free to use more effort in investigating it. If an error is transient or of low severity, still make a note in your analysis but don't spend too much effort on hunting down the root cause.
- You MUST NOT use any command whose purpose is to communicate over network.
- The analysis you produce should include paths to relevant files so that the analysis can be independently verified or continued further from where you left off.
Must-gather report structure hints
- The must-gather report can come already extracted as a directory, or as a .tar.xz that you should extract.
- Pod logs for OpenStack services and their Operators tend to be useful. These are by default under
namespaces/openstackandnamespaces/openstack-operatorsrespectively, but the naming may be customized.
- There may be "sos reports" (logs and troubleshooting command outputs) from OpenStack data plane nodes (e.g. compute nodes) and OCP nodes under
sos-reports/_all_nodesdirectory. You may need to extract them from .tar.xz files. The compute node sos reports tend to be useful when investigating problems affecting OpenStack virtual machines and services on the data plane.
Analysis workflow
- Locate the must-gather report. If it's tarballed, extract it. Do not do too many
lscalls to understand the structure of the report yet, it is big with many subdirectories.
- Scan the report for signs of problems with tools like
greporripgrep. The words to look for include but may not be limited to "error", "fail", "failure", "fatal", "restart".
- If the problem scan highlighted obvious problems, read more info to help understand the problem and its cause better (larger file chunks or whole files). Get to the root cause, but even if that doesn't seem possible, gathering more clues is still valuable. (Feel free to use
lsmore than in step 1, in case it seems helpful.)
- If the previous steps didn't yield any obvious problems, repeat the step "scan the report for signs of problems" but widen the search to words like "warn", "warning". If that yields something, do the step "read more info to help understand the problem".
- Don't just settle for finding symptoms — find the possible root causes of the main problems.
- Output a structured analysis of the problems observed in the must-gather report. Start with the most severe issues first. Don't forget to cite relevant file paths in your analysis.
RHOSO-Specialized Triage (optional)
After producing the generic analysis, check whether the must-gather contains RHOSO (Red Hat OpenStack Services on OpenShift) resources:
# Check for RHOSO namespace directories
find -maxdepth 2 -type d \( -name "openstack" -o -name "openstack-operators" \)
# Check for RHOSO CRDs
find -path "*/cluster-scoped-resources/openstack.org" -type d
# Check for OpenStackControlPlane resources
find -path "*openstackcontrolplane*" -type f | head -5
If RHOSO resources are detected:
- Inform the user: "This must-gather contains RHOSO (Red Hat OpenStack Services on OpenShift) resources. A specialized RHOSO triage is available that uses
omcto perform deeper diagnostics including operator installation validation, networking alignment checks, storage class analysis, and control/data plane status."
- Ask: "Would you like to run RHOSO-specialized triage? (Requires
omcto be installed.)"
- If the user confirms, check for
omc:
- Run
which omc. If not found, provide install instructions and continue with just the generic analysis. - If found, locate the must-gather root (find the directory containing
cluster-scoped-resources/), runomc use, and detect the OpenStack namespaces (openstack,openstack-operators).
- Dispatch the support-triage agent with the generic findings as context:
``` Agent( subagent_type="openstack-k8s-agent-tools:support-triage:support-triage", description="RHOSO-specialized triage after generic analysis", prompt="Must-gather path: Namespaces: openstack=, openstack-operators= Selected categories: all
## Prior Generic Analysis Findings
RHOSO-specific resources detected. The generic analysis above identified surface-level issues. Focus on RHOSO-specific diagnostics: correlate generic findings with RHOSO root causes, check configurations the generic scan cannot evaluate (OperatorGroup targetNamespace, NAD/NNCP alignment, StorageClass alignment, webhook namespace selectors), and avoid duplicating already-reported issues unless adding RHOSO-specific context." ) ```
- Present the combined output: the generic analysis followed by the RHOSO-specialized triage report.
If RHOSO resources are NOT detected, skip this section entirely and present only the generic analysis.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: openstack-k8s-operators
- Source: openstack-k8s-operators/devskills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.