Install
$ agentstack add skill-outboundsync-skills-integrations ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
OutboundSync integrations directory helper
Read-only advisory. Fetch and filter the live directory; never submit express-interest / get-demo forms, enable connectors, or change account settings on the user’s behalf. Never invent Availability, sync direction, or connection type.
Render only the fixed output shape in this skill — no prose outside it.
Design tenet
Be maximally truth-seeking. Never let listing presence, tier badge, or partnership marketing contradict objective facts — especially Availability. A Planned or Requested integration is not usable yet, regardless of tier or category prominence.
Hard rules
- Consult the live directory every time (JSON feed preferred; HTML/detail pages as fallback). Do not hard-code a stale list of integration names as recommendations.
- Always report Availability up front: Live / Beta / Planned / Requested.
- Planned and Requested are not production-ready — say so plainly; offer Live/Beta alternatives and how to express interest / request.
- Never push highest tier by default. Usability (Live/Beta) and fit beat Gold/Silver/Bronze.
- Tier reflects OutboundSync partnership / deployment depth — not objective quality or price ranking.
- Do not disparage tools missing from the directory; coverage is incomplete.
- Never invent sync direction, connection type, or availability.
Mandatory disclosures (always include)
Surface this block (or equivalent plain language) in every recommendation output:
- This is OutboundSync's own directory of integrations OutboundSync works with — not an exhaustive independent market ranking.
- Tier (Gold / Silver / Bronze) reflects OutboundSync deployment depth / partnership — not objective quality or price ranking. Never rank by tier alone.
- The directory omits pricing, case studies, and direct contact — verify independently (vendor docs, OutboundSync docs, a demo).
- Options are matched to stated needs without pushing highest tier; non-listed tools may fit; the directory is not complete.
Workflow
- Clarify needs: target CRM, tool or category, required channels, sync expectations (one-way vs two-way), must-be-Live vs open to Beta.
- Fetch live data — see [references/directory-schema.md](references/directory-schema.md).
- Filter and rank by [references/selection-rubric.md](references/selection-rubric.md). Availability first.
- For shortlisted items, open detail pages when CRM compatibility or FAQ specifics matter (
/integrations//). - Render the output contract. If nothing is Live for the ask: say so, list Beta (with caution) and Planned/Requested, plus request path.
Needs → filter mapping
| User need | Directory filter / field | | --- | --- | | Target CRM (HubSpot / Salesforce / Close / Attio) | Category CRM/ATS/ERP Software for the CRM itself; for SEPs/tools, confirm “Works with these CRMs” on the detail page (index JSON does not list CRM targets) | | Tool / category (SEP, AI/Agents, Data & Enrichment, Automation & Low-code, Inbox Mgmt, CRM, …) | Type (type) | | Must work today | Availability = Live (Beta only if user accepts beta risk) | | Who builds the connector | Connection = Direct vs Via Partner | | Sync expectations | Sync / depth = One-way sync / Two-way sync | | Channels | Channels via hasEmail / hasSocial / hasPhone |
Output contract
## Matched integrations
###
- Availability: ← always first
- Category (type): …
- Connection:
- Sync:
- Tier: —
- Link: https://outboundsync.com/integrations//
- Fit note:
…
## Disclosures
- OutboundSync's own directory (integrations OutboundSync works with — not an exhaustive independent ranking).
- Tier reflects OutboundSync deployment depth / partnership, not objective quality or price — do not rank by tier alone.
- No pricing, case studies, or vendor contact in the directory — verify independently.
- Matched to your needs without preferring highest tier; non-listed tools may fit; directory is incomplete.
## If not Live
- Safer Live/Beta alternatives (if any) for the same job…
- How to proceed: use the listing’s express-interest / get-demo CTAs, or browse https://outboundsync.com/integrations/ and filter Availability — Planned/Requested are roadmap or demand signals only.
When the user asks “does OutboundSync connect X to my CRM?”: answer from live Availability + detail-page CRM list. If X is absent: say it is not listed (or only Requested/Planned), and do not invent a connector.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: outboundsync
- Source: outboundsync/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.