Install
$ agentstack add skill-outcomeeng-claude-aligning ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Check Spec Tree files for conformance to templates, atemporal voice, and content placement rules. Report non-conformances as facts. Do not suggest fixes, rate severity, or prioritize findings.
- Verify `
marker is present — if not, invoke/understanding` first - Read all references and templates from the understanding skill's directory
- Glob
spx/**/*.md(or user-specified scope) - Classify each file, check against three dimensions, report findings
- FACTS ONLY — Report what violates which rule. Never suggest how to fix it. Never rate severity. Never say "should", "consider", or "recommend."
- RULES FROM UNDERSTANDING — All conformance rules live in the understanding skill's references and templates. This skill owns zero rules. Read them at check time.
- STRICT CLASSIFICATION — Only
.enablerand.outcomeare recognized node types. Only.adr.md,.pdr.md,.prd.md/.product.mdare recognized decision/product files. Anything else is "unrecognized." - COMPLETE SCAN — Check every
.mdfile in scope. Do not skip files. Do not sample. - FOUNDATION REQUIRED — The `
marker must be present. If absent, stop and instruct the user to invoke/understanding` first.
All conformance rules come from the understanding skill, a sibling directory to this skill.
The understanding skill is a sibling directory to this skill. Its files are at:
${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/
References (conformance rules):
${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/references/durable-map.md— `` section: temporal markers table and read-aloud test${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/references/what-goes-where.md— `` table: content in wrong artifact type${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/references/node-types.md— `and` sections: directory suffix classification
Templates (structural rules):
${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/templates/decisions/decision-name.adr.md— required ADR sections${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/templates/decisions/decision-name.pdr.md— required PDR sections${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/templates/product/product-name.product.md— required product sections${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/templates/nodes/enabler-name.md— required enabler sections${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/templates/nodes/outcome-name.md— required outcome sections
If you cannot find understanding's files:
- Glob:
${SKILL_DIR}/../understanding/references/*.md - Do NOT look in the user's project directory for references or templates
Classify each .md file in scope by its filename extension or parent directory suffix:
| Pattern | Classification | Template | | --------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------- | | *.adr.md | ADR | decision-name.adr.md | | *.pdr.md | PDR | decision-name.pdr.md | | *.prd.md or *.product.md | Product | product-name.product.md | | Spec file inside *.enabler/ directory | Enabler | enabler-name.md | | Spec file inside *.outcome/ directory | Outcome | outcome-name.md | | Any other .md file | Unrecognized | None |
Spec file means the file whose name matches the directory slug. Example: auth.md inside 10-auth.enabler/. Other .md files in the directory (like CLAUDE.md) are not spec files — skip them.
Unrecognized includes directories with suffixes like .capability, .feature, .story. These are not Spec Tree node types. Report the classification failure as a finding.
Files to skip entirely:
CLAUDE.mdfiles (project configuration, not specs)- Files inside
tests/directories (test code, not specs)
Compare each classified file's ## headings against its template's ## headings.
Report as findings:
- Missing section: Template has
## Purposebut file does not - Name mismatch: File has
## Problemwhere template expects## Purpose - Unrecognized assertion type: Assertion heading not in the five types (Scenarios, Mappings, Conformance, Properties, Compliance)
Do NOT report:
- Extra sections beyond the template (specs may have project-specific additions)
- Missing optional sections (templates mark optional sections with "Only include if...")
Read the ` section from durable-map.md`. It provides two checking mechanisms:
A. Temporal markers table — The left column lists specific phrases to find. Scan every line for matches.
B. Read-aloud test — "Read any sentence aloud. If it would sound wrong after the work is done, it's temporal." Apply to each non-template sentence.
Common temporal patterns caught by the read-aloud test that may not appear in the markers table:
- "supersedes" / "replaces" / "deprecated" (narrates history of decisions)
- "previously" / "used to" / "was" / "has been" (past tense narration)
- "going to" / "will need to" / "plan to" (future intentions)
- "migrate" / "transition" / "phase out" (describes a journey)
- Problem framing: "Users face X" / "X is broken" / "X causes Y" (narrates a gap to fill)
Report as findings:
- Line number, the temporal text, which rule it violates (specific marker or read-aloud test)
- Reference:
(ref: atemporal_voice)
Do NOT report:
- Template placeholder text (e.g.,
{1-3 sentences: what concern...}) - Content inside code fences
- Content inside HTML comments
Read the ` table from what-goes-where.md`. For each row, check whether the file contains content that belongs elsewhere.
Key signals:
| Signal in file | Wrong location | Correct location | | ------------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------- | | Architecture choice or technical approach | Spec | ADR | | Product decision or user guarantee | Spec | PDR | | Outcome hypothesis (WE BELIEVE THAT...) | ADR or PDR | Outcome spec | | Implementation detail (code patterns, APIs) | Spec | Code | | "How to build it" | Spec | ADR or code | | Cross-cutting invariant | Child spec | Ancestor spec or PDR |
Report as findings:
- File, approximate location, what content was found, where it belongs per the table
- Reference:
(ref: what-goes-where)
- Gate: Check conversation for `
marker. If absent, stop: "Invoke/understanding` first." - Load rules: Read all references and templates listed in `` from the understanding skill's directory.
- Scope: Use user-specified path, or default to
spx/in the project root. - Discover: Glob
{scope}/**/*.mdto find all markdown files. ExcludeCLAUDE.mdfiles and files insidetests/directories. - Classify: Map each file to its artifact type per ``.
- Check each file:
- If classified: run structural, language, and placement checks
- If unrecognized: report classification failure, then run language check only (language rules apply to all text)
- Report: Emit findings grouped by file path per ``.
- Summary: End with counts.
## Alignment Report: {scope}
### {file path}
Classification: {type}
Structural:
- {finding}
Language:
- Line {N}: "{text}" — {rule violated} (ref: atemporal_voice)
Placement:
- {finding} (ref: what-goes-where)
---
{N} files checked. {M} findings across {K} files.
Formatting rules:
- Omit dimension headings (Structural / Language / Placement) when a file has no findings for that dimension
- Omit files with zero findings entirely
- If all files pass all checks:
"0 findings." - For unrecognized files, replace the Classification line with:
Classification: Unrecognized — {reason}
- [ ] `` marker verified present
- [ ] All references and templates read from understanding skill
- [ ] Every
.mdfile in scope classified or reported as unrecognized - [ ] Structural checks run against correct template per file type
- [ ] Language checks applied to all files (including unrecognized)
- [ ] Placement checks applied to all classified files
- [ ] Report contains only factual findings — no suggestions, no severity, no "should"
- [ ] Summary counts emitted
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: outcomeeng
- Source: outcomeeng/claude
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.