AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Creo Ux Competitor

skill-oyusypenko-creo-creo-ux-competitor · by oyusypenko

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-oyusypenko-creo-creo-ux-competitor

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Creo Ux Competitor? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Competitor UX Analysis

Analyze external competitor websites to extract UX insights and learnings. Navigates competitor sites as a real user, documents their UX patterns, evaluates against professional standards, and identifies opportunities for differentiation.

Commands

| Command | Description | |---------|-------------| | /creo ux-competitor | Analyze a single competitor website | | /creo ux-competitor compare | Compare two competitor websites |

Core Instructions

Configuration

  1. Check for project-specific config at .claude/project-config.md
  2. Read competitors (pre-configured list by tier), reports_path
  3. Load project extension if it exists at .claude/skills/creo-ux-competitor/creo-ux-competitor-{project_id}.md. This file contains project-specific competitor list, positioning, differentiators, and analysis focus areas. {project_id} comes from project-config.md. Always load it before doing work.
  4. If no config exists, ask user for competitor URL

Phase 1: Competitor Research

Before navigating, gather background info via web search:

  • Company background and target audience
  • Key features and value proposition
  • User reviews (what people love and hate)

Identify key flows to analyze:

  • Onboarding / Sign-up
  • Core feature experience
  • Pricing / Conversion
  • Mobile experience

Phase 2: Live Analysis

Navigation strategy:

  1. Start at homepage
  2. Follow the primary user journey
  3. Screenshot every meaningful screen (use full page capture)
  4. Note micro-interactions and feedback
  5. Test on multiple viewports (375px mobile, 1440px desktop)

What to capture:

  • First impressions (homepage)
  • Sign-up / Onboarding flow
  • Core feature experience
  • Empty states and error handling
  • Help / Support access
  • Pricing presentation

Phase 3: Professional Evaluation

JTBD Analysis

> When [situation], users want to [motivation], so they can [outcome].

Nielsen's Heuristics (Score 0-4)

| # | Heuristic | Questions | |---|-----------|-----------| | 1 | Visibility | Do users know what is happening? | | 2 | Real world match | Is language familiar? | | 3 | User control | Can users undo/cancel? | | 4 | Consistency | Are patterns repeated? | | 5 | Error prevention | Are mistakes prevented? | | 6 | Recognition | Are options visible? | | 7 | Flexibility | Are there shortcuts? | | 8 | Minimalism | Is it clutter-free? | | 9 | Error recovery | Are error messages helpful? | | 10 | Help | Is guidance available? |

Competitive Dimensions (Rate 1-5)
  • Simplicity -- How easy to use?
  • Speed -- How fast to complete tasks?
  • Clarity -- How clear is the UI?
  • Delight -- Any wow moments?
  • Trust -- Does it feel reliable?

Phase 4: Insights Extraction

What They Do WELL (Copy/Adapt)
  • Patterns that reduce friction
  • Clever interactions
  • Effective copywriting
  • Trust-building elements
What They Do POORLY (Avoid/Improve)
  • Friction points
  • Confusing flows
  • Missing features
  • Bad patterns
Opportunities for Us
  • Gaps in their offering
  • Features they lack
  • Better approaches possible
  • Differentiation opportunities

Report Structure

# Competitor Analysis: [Name]

**URL:** [https://...]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]

## Executive Summary
## Company Overview (target audience, value proposition, pricing)
## JTBD Analysis
## Flow Analysis (homepage, onboarding, core feature, mobile)
## Heuristic Evaluation (score table, total out of 40)
## Competitive Scorecard (simplicity, speed, clarity, delight, trust)
## Key Insights (what they do well, what they do poorly, opportunities)
## Recommendations for Our Product (immediate actions, consider later)
## Screenshots Gallery

Report Output

Save to: .claude/reports/competitor-[name]-[YYYYMMDD].md

Reference Files

Load these on demand for extended guidance:

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | references/nielsen-heuristics.md | Detailed heuristic evaluation guide | | references/competitive-scorecard.md | Scoring methodology |

Quality Gates

  • Screenshots must use full page capture
  • Both mobile (375px) and desktop (1440px) viewports must be tested
  • Every heuristic must be scored with evidence
  • Report must include actionable recommendations for your own product
  • Insights must be categorized as learn-from, avoid, or opportunity
  • Report must be saved as a file

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.