AgentStack
SKILL verified Apache-2.0 Self-run

Research Overview Pipeline

skill-panjose-co-scientist-research-overview-pipeline · by panjose

Generate the final research overview from the top-ranked hypotheses.

No reviews yet
0 installs
10 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-panjose-co-scientist-research-overview-pipeline

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Research Overview Pipeline? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

research-overview-pipeline

Goal:

  • Generate the final research overview from the top-ranked hypotheses.

Inputs:

  • research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json
  • top-ranked hypotheses//HYPOTHESIS.json artifacts with completed review payloads
  • optional meta/INSIGHTS_FROM_REVIEWS.json

Outputs:

  • meta/RESEARCH_OVERVIEW.json
  • updated state/PIPELINE_STATE.json
  • updated state/CURRENT_STAGE.json

Context Loading:

  • Read research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json.
  • Read packages/agent_contracts/pipeline_runtime.py before updating state/PIPELINE_STATE.json or state/CURRENT_STAGE.json.
  • Read state/EVOLUTION_STATE.json before writing the overview.
  • Read literature/queries/*/EVIDENCE_BUNDLE.json when literature artifacts exist and record whether any retrieval_metadata.status is partial or blocked.
  • Read state/PROXIMITY_STATUS.json when it exists and record whether proximity was succeeded or degraded to a skipped/failed fallback state.
  • Use research_goal as the synthesis anchor.
  • Use preferences and constraints to frame which research directions are worth elevating.
  • Read the current top-ranked hypothesis artifacts together with their embedded or adjacent review results.
  • If meta/INSIGHTS_FROM_REVIEWS.json exists, use it to highlight recurring critique patterns and unresolved risks across the run.

Execution Prompt Contract:

  • System Intent:
  • You are synthesizing the strongest current hypotheses into a final research overview.
  • Required Reasoning Focus:
  • Group the strongest candidates into 3-5 coherent research directions or areas where possible.
  • Explain why each direction matters relative to the research goal.
  • Suggest concrete experiments or next steps for each direction.
  • Use review evidence and recurring critique patterns to keep the overview realistic rather than promotional.
  • Explain the actual run stop state from state/EVOLUTION_STATE.json.
  • When any evidence bundle is partial or blocked, include a concise literature retrieval limitation note; do not describe the run as having comprehensive literature coverage in that case.
  • When PROXIMITY_STATUS.json records a skipped or failed fallback, include a concise proximity embedding fallback limitation note; do not describe ranking as embedding-, proximity-, or similarity-informed in that case.
  • Do Not Do:
  • Do not simply concatenate ranked hypotheses.
  • Do not ignore major recurring weaknesses surfaced by review.
  • Do not produce a vague essay without clear actionable research directions.
  • Do not claim that the frontier converged unless EVOLUTION_STATE.stopReason is exactly convergence_reached.
  • Do not describe a safety stop, capped stop, or paused state as scientific convergence.
  • Do not call partial or blocked literature retrieval comprehensive, complete, exhaustive, or full literature coverage.
  • Do not call receipt-gated manual placement embedding-informed, proximity-informed, or similarity-driven ranking.
  • Do not omit degraded literature or proximity bridge limitations from a completed overview.
  • Output Shape:
  • Produce the exact ResearchOverviewContract from packages/agent_contracts/meta_review.py.
  • When updating state/PIPELINE_STATE.json, preserve the exact PipelineStateContract from packages/agent_contracts/pipeline_runtime.py.
  • When this synthesis step starts, use from tools import sync_pipeline_stage_artifacts so currentPhase = Research Overview, currentSkill = research-overview-pipeline, and stageTrail stay aligned across both state artifacts.
  • Use ## sections for major directions and ### subsections where helpful.
  • Keep the overview concise and decision-oriented.

Execution Steps:

  1. Open skills/shared-references/schema-index.md, then read packages/agent_contracts/meta_review.py and packages/agent_contracts/pipeline_runtime.py before writing meta/RESEARCH_OVERVIEW.json or updating run-level stage artifacts.
  2. Before synthesizing the overview, call tools.sync_pipeline_stage_artifacts(run_dir, current_phase="Research Overview", current_skill="research-overview-pipeline").
  3. Read state/EVOLUTION_STATE.json and record whether the stop reason is convergence_reached, max_iterations_reached, safety_iteration_limit_reached, no_viable_candidates, or still empty.
  4. Read the research plan and current top-ranked hypothesis artifacts.
  5. Read run-level literature bundle statuses and proximity status when those artifacts exist.
  6. Read run-level critique insights if they exist.
  7. Group the strongest hypotheses into coherent directions.
  8. Write one synthesized overview that explains importance, evidence, next experiments, and the real stop state. Use convergence language only for stopReason=convergence_reached; for safety stops use language such as "synthesis after the safety ceiling" rather than "frontier converged". When literature or proximity is degraded, include the limitation in plain language without overstating the pipeline evidence.
  • If literature retrieval is partial or blocked, state that external evidence coverage was partial, limited, blocked, or otherwise incomplete.
  • If proximity embedding is skipped or failed, state that proximity embedding was unavailable/skipped and ranking continued through documented fallback rather than true embedding/proximity-informed placement.
  1. Write meta/RESEARCH_OVERVIEW.json.
  2. Update state/PIPELINE_STATE.json and state/CURRENT_STAGE.json as required by the top-level workflow.
  3. Validate the run artifacts before declaring completion.

Artifact Rules:

  • RESEARCH_OVERVIEW.json is the canonical machine-consumable overview artifact.
  • The overview should synthesize rather than repeat the underlying hypotheses.
  • Any pipeline-state update must remain consistent with the completion and state contracts.
  • Overview evidence claims must remain consistent with literature retrieval and proximity bridge status artifacts.

Completion Rule:

  • This skill is complete only when meta/RESEARCH_OVERVIEW.json exists, required state updates have been written, and the run validates for downstream consumption.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.