Install
$ agentstack add skill-patonkikh-apes-product-vision-builder ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Product Vision Builder
Purpose
Define a product vision that connects user problems, strategic direction, and measurable north star using the Product Vision Canvas.
Input: Problem statement, persona (optional), business context (optional) Output: Product Vision document with vision statement, principles, and north star metric candidate Examples: See [examples.md](examples.md) for worked input/output.
Workflow
Step 1: Synthesize inputs
Consolidate:
- Core problem being solved (from problem statement or user input)
- Primary persona and their success definition
- Business constraints (market, timeline, resources)
- Competitive landscape (if provided)
Step 2: Draft vision statement
Format:
For [target user] who [need/problem], [product name] is a [category] that [key benefit]. Unlike [alternatives], we [differentiation].
Keep to 2–3 sentences maximum.
Step 3: Define product principles
Establish 3–5 guiding principles:
- Decision-making rules for the team
- Trade-off preferences (speed vs quality, breadth vs depth)
- Non-negotiables (security, accessibility, etc.)
Each principle must be actionable, not aspirational slogans.
Step 4: Identify north star metric
Select one metric that:
- Reflects core value delivered to users
- Is measurable and trackable
- Correlates with long-term business success
Document:
- North star metric definition
- Input metrics that drive it (3–5 leading indicators)
- Anti-metrics (what you will NOT optimize at expense of vision)
Step 5: Define 3-year direction
Outline:
- Year 1: foundation (what must be true)
- Year 2: expansion (what grows)
- Year 3: maturity (what scales)
Keep realistic given stated constraints.
Step 6: Validate
Run Validation checklist.
Decision Rules
| Condition | Action | |-----------|--------| | No problem statement or equivalent | Stop; request problem context or run problem-statement-builder | | Vision statement includes feature list | Reframe to outcome and differentiation, not features | | Multiple north star metrics proposed | Force selection of one primary; others become input metrics | | Principles are generic ("user first") | Rewrite as actionable decision rules | | 3-year plan ignores stated constraints | Revise to match resources and timeline |
Validation
- [ ] Vision statement follows For/Who/Is/That/Unlike/We format
- [ ] 3–5 actionable product principles defined
- [ ] Exactly one north star metric with definition
- [ ] 3–5 input metrics linked to north star
- [ ] Anti-metrics documented
- [ ] 3-year direction is realistic given constraints
- [ ] No feature laundry list in vision statement
Anti-patterns
- Feature vision — listing capabilities instead of user outcome.
- Multiple north stars — diluting focus across competing metrics.
- Slogan principles — "innovate", "delight users" without decision guidance.
- Ignoring constraints — 3-year unicorn plan for a 2-person team.
- Copying competitor vision — differentiation says "like X but better" without substance.
Best Practices
- Connect vision directly to validated problem statement.
- Make principles testable: "When X conflicts with Y, choose X."
- North star should be measurable within first 90 days (even if baseline is zero).
- Review vision against persona anti-goals.
- Keep vision stable; tactics change, vision should not shift weekly.
Output Structure
# Product Vision: [Product Name]
## Vision Statement
[For/Who/Is/That/Unlike/We paragraph]
## Product Principles
| # | Principle | Decision rule |
|---|-----------|---------------|
## North Star
- **Metric:** [name]
- **Definition:** [how measured]
- **Current baseline:** [if known]
## Input Metrics
| Metric | Drives north star by... |
|--------|-------------------------|
## Anti-metrics
- [What we won't optimize]
## 3-Year Direction
| Year | Focus | Key milestone |
|------|-------|---------------|
## Assumptions
- [ ] [Assumption]
Next Skills
| Outcome | Recommended Skill | |---------|-------------------| | Need to prioritize features | product/feature-prioritization | | Ready for detailed requirements | product/prd-generator | | Need OKRs from vision | product/feature-prioritization | | Vision needs user grounding | product/persona-generator |
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: patonkikh
- Source: patonkikh/APES
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.