AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Prompt Engineer

skill-patonkikh-apes-prompt-engineer · by patonkikh

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
5 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-patonkikh-apes-prompt-engineer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-patonkikh-apes-prompt-engineer)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
1mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Prompt Engineer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Prompt Engineer

Purpose

Design production-grade prompts: system instructions, task templates, variable slots, few-shot examples, and output format contracts.

Input: Task definition, AI architecture (optional), example inputs/outputs (optional), constraints Output: Prompt specification with template, variables, examples, and test cases References: See [references.md](references.md) for domain cheat sheets. Examples: See [examples.md](examples.md) for worked input/output.


Workflow

Step 1: Define prompt objective

Specify:

  • Single task the prompt performs (one objective per prompt)
  • Success criteria (what good output looks like)
  • Failure modes to prevent

Step 2: Structure the prompt

Use layered structure:

  1. Objective — what to accomplish
  2. Context — background information slots
  3. Instructions — step-by-step task rules
  4. Constraints — what not to do
  5. Output format — exact structure expected
  6. Examples — few-shot demonstrations (2–3)

Step 3: Define variables

| Variable | Type | Required | Description | |----------|------|----------|-------------|

Use {{variable_name}} placeholders. Document validation rules.

Step 4: Write output format contract

Specify exact output structure:

  • JSON schema description, or
  • Markdown sections, or
  • Structured text pattern

Include handling for edge cases (empty input, ambiguous input).

Step 5: Create test cases

| ID | Input | Expected behavior | Pass criteria | |----|-------|-------------------|---------------|

Minimum 5 test cases: happy path, edge cases, adversarial input.

Step 6: Validate

Run Validation checklist.


Decision Rules

| Condition | Action | |-----------|--------| | Multiple unrelated tasks in one prompt | Split into separate prompts | | No output format specified | Define strict format before delivery | | Task requires external data not in variables | Add variable or recommend RAG/tool integration | | Prompt exceeds ~2000 tokens template | Modularize; use context-engineering skill | | Customer-facing without refusal behavior | Add constraint block for out-of-scope requests |


Validation

  • [ ] Single clear objective stated
  • [ ] All 6 prompt layers present
  • [ ] Variables documented with types and validation
  • [ ] Output format contract is unambiguous
  • [ ] ≥2 few-shot examples included
  • [ ] ≥5 test cases with pass criteria
  • [ ] No Role Play or persona assignment phrasing
  • [ ] Refusal/out-of-scope handling for user-facing prompts

Anti-patterns

  • Mega-prompt — everything in one undifferentiated block.
  • Vague instructions — "be helpful", "be accurate" without specifics.
  • No output format — free-form when structure is needed.
  • Missing negative constraints — not saying what to avoid.
  • Example pollution — examples that contradict instructions.

Best Practices

  • Put instructions after context (recency bias).
  • Use delimiters for variable content (---, XML tags).
  • Test with edge cases before production.
  • Version prompts with changelog.
  • Pair with prompt-reviewer before deployment.

Output Structure

# Prompt Specification: [Prompt Name]
**Version:** 1.0

## Objective
[Single task description]

## Template

[Full prompt with {{variables}}]


## Variables
| Name | Type | Required | Validation |
|------|------|----------|------------|

## Output Format
[Exact structure]

## Examples
### Example 1
**Input:** ...
**Output:** ...

## Test Cases
| ID | Input | Pass criteria |
|----|-------|---------------|

## Changelog
| Version | Change |
|---------|--------|

Next Skills

| Outcome | Recommended Skill | |---------|-------------------| | Review prompt quality | ai/prompt-reviewer | | Optimize token usage | ai/prompt-optimizer | | Manage context budget | ai/context-engineering | | AI architecture context | ai/ai-solution-architect |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.