Install
$ agentstack add skill-patricio0312rev-skillset-guardrails-safety-filter-builder Open-source listing, not yet scanned by AgentStack. Follow the source repository for install instructions.
Security review
⚠ Flagged1 finding(s); flagged for manual review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- • Prompt-injection patterns
- • Secret / credential exfiltration
- • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- • Untrusted network calls
- • Known-malicious package signatures
- high Possible prompt-injection directive.
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Guardrails & Safety Filter Builder
Build comprehensive safety systems for LLM applications.
Safety Layers
- Input filtering: Block malicious prompts
- Output filtering: Redact sensitive data
- Topic constraints: Policy-based refusals
- PII detection: Mask personal information
- Prompt injection: Detect manipulation attempts
PII Detection & Redaction
import re
from presidio_analyzer import AnalyzerEngine
from presidio_anonymizer import AnonymizerEngine
analyzer = AnalyzerEngine()
anonymizer = AnonymizerEngine()
def redact_pii(text: str) -> str:
# Detect PII
results = analyzer.analyze(
text=text,
language='en',
entities=["EMAIL_ADDRESS", "PHONE_NUMBER", "CREDIT_CARD", "SSN"]
)
# Anonymize
anonymized = anonymizer.anonymize(text, results)
return anonymized.text
# Example: "My email is john@example.com" → "My email is "
Prompt Injection Detection
def detect_prompt_injection(user_input: str) -> bool:
"""Detect common prompt injection patterns"""
patterns = [
r'ignore (previous|above) instructions',
r'disregard (all|any) (prior|previous)',
r'you are now',
r'new instructions',
r'system:',
r'override',
]
for pattern in patterns:
if re.search(pattern, user_input, re.IGNORECASE):
return True
return False
# Block if detected
if detect_prompt_injection(user_input):
return "I cannot process that request."
Topic Constraints
# Define allowed/disallowed topics
POLICY = {
"allowed_topics": [
"product_features",
"troubleshooting",
"billing",
"account_management"
],
"disallowed_topics": [
"medical_advice",
"legal_advice",
"financial_advice",
"politics",
"violence"
],
"requires_disclaimer": [
"security_practices",
"data_privacy"
]
}
# Classify topic
def classify_topic(query: str) -> str:
classification_prompt = f"""
Classify this query into one of these topics:
{', '.join(POLICY['allowed_topics'] + POLICY['disallowed_topics'])}
Query: {query}
Return only the topic name.
"""
return llm(classification_prompt)
# Check policy
def check_policy(query: str) -> dict:
topic = classify_topic(query)
if topic in POLICY["disallowed_topics"]:
return {
"allowed": False,
"reason": f"Cannot provide {topic}",
"refusal": REFUSAL_TEMPLATES[topic]
}
return {"allowed": True, "topic": topic}
Refusal Templates
REFUSAL_TEMPLATES = {
"medical_advice": """
I cannot provide medical advice. Please consult with a healthcare
professional for medical concerns.
""",
"legal_advice": """
I cannot provide legal advice. For legal matters, please consult
with a qualified attorney.
""",
"out_of_scope": """
I'm designed to help with product documentation and support.
This question is outside my area of expertise.
""",
}
def refuse_safely(reason: str) -> str:
return REFUSAL_TEMPLATES.get(reason, REFUSAL_TEMPLATES["out_of_scope"])
Output Validation
def validate_output(output: str) -> dict:
"""Check output before returning to user"""
issues = []
# Check for PII
pii_results = analyzer.analyze(output, language='en')
if pii_results:
issues.append("Contains PII")
output = redact_pii(output)
# Check for banned phrases
banned_phrases = ["password", "api key", "secret"]
for phrase in banned_phrases:
if phrase.lower() in output.lower():
issues.append(f"Contains banned phrase: {phrase}")
# Check toxicity
toxicity_score = toxicity_classifier(output)
if toxicity_score > 0.7:
issues.append("High toxicity detected")
return {
"safe": len(issues) == 0,
"issues": issues,
"sanitized_output": output
}
Complete Guardrail Pipeline
def apply_guardrails(user_input: str) -> dict:
# 1. Input validation
if detect_prompt_injection(user_input):
return {
"allowed": False,
"response": "Invalid request detected."
}
# 2. Policy check
policy_check = check_policy(user_input)
if not policy_check["allowed"]:
return {
"allowed": False,
"response": policy_check["refusal"]
}
# 3. Generate response
response = llm(user_input)
# 4. Output validation
validation = validate_output(response)
if not validation["safe"]:
return {
"allowed": True,
"response": validation["sanitized_output"],
"warnings": validation["issues"]
}
return {
"allowed": True,
"response": response
}
Best Practices
- Layer multiple defenses
- Log all blocked requests
- Provide helpful refusals
- Redact, don't reject when possible
- Regular pattern updates
- Human review of edge cases
Output Checklist
- [ ] PII detection implemented
- [ ] Prompt injection detection
- [ ] Topic classification
- [ ] Policy constraints defined
- [ ] Refusal templates written
- [ ] Output validation
- [ ] Logging/monitoring
- [ ] Test cases for bypasses
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: patricio0312rev
- Source: patricio0312rev/skillset
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.