AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Build Right Engineering Principles

skill-pax-k-build-right-build-right-engineering-principles · by pax-k

Apply Build Right engineering principles as a planning, implementation, and review standard. Use when Codex is designing architecture boundaries, splitting modules or features, creating public contracts, changing provider adapters, reviewing implementation quality, planning tests, handling side effects, errors, observability, security, or deciding whether markdown guidance needs enforceable check…

No reviews yet
0 installs
31 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-pax-k-build-right-build-right-engineering-principles

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-pax-k-build-right-build-right-engineering-principles)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Build Right Engineering Principles? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Build Right Engineering Principles

Use this skill as a cross-cutting engineering standard for Build Right projects. It is not a lifecycle phase. It is a review and design lens that other Build Right skills may load when architecture, contracts, implementation boundaries, or engineering-quality tradeoffs matter.

Required Reading

  • Read references/principles.md before making or reviewing changes that touch

architecture boundaries, public contracts, provider adapters, generated code, package ownership, side effects, errors, observability, security, testing strategy, or enforceable policy.

  • Do not load the reference for routine product capture, backlog grooming, or

narrow content-only updates unless those topics raise engineering-risk questions.

Operating Mode

  1. Identify the changed or proposed engineering surface:

architecture, module responsibility, dependency direction, contract, adapter, state shape, side effect, failure path, test, evidence, or policy.

  1. Apply the review checklist from references/principles.md.
  2. Separate guidance from enforceable authority. Markdown principles are

guidance until backed by code, checks, tests, schemas, policy, or evidence.

  1. Prefer the smallest correction that preserves local patterns and reduces

real risk. Do not introduce abstraction only because a principle names one.

  1. When repeated findings expose a process gap, recommend an enforcement

surface instead of adding more prose.

  1. Record significant architecture or public-contract choices in the target

repo's normal decision surface.

Closeout

End with the engineering result that matters:

Principles applied: 
Required changes: 
Enforcement gap: 
Residual risk: 

User-Visible Status Badge

End every final response with exactly one status badge block:

✅ [DONE] Status: DONE
Decision: 
Next action: 
Needs user input: 
Blocked by: 

Use this status map:

  • ✅ [DONE] Status: DONE when there are no required changes and

no enforcement gap.

  • 🟢 [GREEN] Status: ALL GREEN when the reviewed direction is safe to

continue but implementation is not complete.

  • 🟡 [YELLOW] Status: NEEDS INPUT when a user or owner architecture,

contract, security, or policy decision is needed.

  • 🟠 [ORANGE] Status: NEEDS WORK when AI-owned corrections, tests,

docs, or enforcement work remain.

  • 🔵 [BLUE] Status: WAITING EXTERNAL for external proof, credentials,

production access, publishing, indexing, or third-party state.

  • 🔴 [RED] Status: BLOCKED for unresolved conflicts, failed

validation, source mismatch, invalid state, or enforcement blockers.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.