AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Blueprint

skill-pekral-cursor-rules-blueprint · by pekral

Use when a single objective is too large for one pull request and must span multiple sessions or PRs. Turns the objective into a sequenced construction plan of 3-12 one-PR steps, each with a cold-start context brief, dependency edges, and exit criteria, then reviews it adversarially and registers it as Markdown.

No reviews yet
0 installs
35 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-pekral-cursor-rules-blueprint

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-pekral-cursor-rules-blueprint)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Blueprint? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Blueprint

Constraints

  • Apply @rules/git/general.mdc — branch, commit, and PR conventions below come from it.
  • Apply @rules/compound-engineering/general.mdc — the plan is durable memory the next agent reuses, not throwaway prose.
  • Apply @rules/laravel/architecture.mdc when the project uses pekral/arch-app-services, so each step lands in the correct layer.
  • Plan only. Do not implement, commit, or push any step.
  • Output Markdown only. English only.
  • Every step must be one pull request: independently reviewable and mergeable on its own.
  • Break the objective into 3-12 steps. Fewer means it likely fits one PR; more means the objective is too broad and should be split first.
  • Each step must be executable cold by @skills/resolve-issue/SKILL.md or a fresh agent with no prior context.
  • Do not invent dependencies on tooling that may be absent. Degrade gracefully when GitHub CLI (gh) is missing.

Use when

  • An objective clearly exceeds one pull request (a migration, a multi-layer feature, a cross-cutting refactor).
  • Work will span multiple sessions or multiple agents and needs a sequenced, resumable plan.
  • You need to know which parts can run in parallel and which must be sequential before starting.

Do not use for single-PR tasks (use @skills/analyze-problem/SKILL.md or @skills/resolve-issue/SKILL.md), for splitting an objective into tracker issues without a dependency graph (use @skills/create-issues-from-text/SKILL.md), or when the user wants one high-leverage suggestion (@skills/smartest-project-addition/SKILL.md / @skills/product-capability/SKILL.md).

Execution

Run the five phases in order. Do not register a plan that has not passed Review.

  1. Research — Establish ground truth before planning.
  • Read the actual code, layers, and conventions the objective will touch. Per @rules/compound-engineering/general.mdc, find the existing part of the system the work extends before inventing a new abstraction.
  • Walk git log / git blame over the affected area to learn how it evolved and what was already tried or reverted.
  • Detect the git baseline: confirm the repo, the default branch (master), and whether gh is available (gh auth status). Record the result; it drives the PR template in Output.
  • For an unfamiliar pattern, library, or security-sensitive surface, consult current authoritative references and cite them.
  1. Design — Decompose the objective into 3-12 one-PR steps.
  • Each step is the smallest change that delivers reviewable value and can merge alone.
  • Sequence steps so each builds on a merged predecessor; never assume an unmerged step's code.
  • Map dependency edges: for every step, list which steps must merge before it. Steps with no shared files and no dependency edge between them may run in parallel.
  • Name the layer each step lands in (Action, Service, Repository, etc.) when @rules/laravel/architecture.mdc applies.
  1. Draft — Write the per-step plan (structure in Output).
  • Give every step a self-contained context brief: enough background, file paths, and conventions for a fresh agent to execute it without reading the other steps.
  • Write concrete, observable exit criteria per step (tests, behavior, verification commands).
  • Add the parallelism summary: the dependency graph and which steps may run concurrently.
  1. Review — Adversarially check the draft against the anti-patterns below before registering. Fix every hit; re-run until clean.
  • A "step" that spans multiple PRs, or is too small to justify its own PR.
  • A step whose context brief is not self-contained (assumes prior conversation or another step's unmerged work).
  • Missing, unobservable, or untestable exit criteria.
  • Hidden ordering: two steps marked parallel that touch the same files or share an unstated dependency.
  • A new abstraction where an existing part of the system already fit (@rules/compound-engineering/general.mdc).
  • Branch / commit / PR wording that violates @rules/git/general.mdc (wrong type, base branch, period, attribution).
  • A plan that assumes gh exists when Research found it absent.
  1. Register — Persist the approved plan as Markdown in the repo (e.g. docs/plans//): one README.md index plus one file per step, or a single plan file when small. State the path so the next agent picks it up.

Output

Register a plan index plus one entry per step.

Plan index (README.md): objective in one or two sentences; ordered step list; the parallelism summary; git baseline (default branch master, gh present yes/no).

Per step:

  • Titletype(scope): short description, lowercase type/scope, no trailing period (@rules/git/general.mdc).
  • Branch — feature branch off master (e.g. feat/).
  • Context brief — self-contained background, file paths, and conventions; readable cold, with no reference to other steps' unmerged work.
  • Tasks — concrete, ordered actions implementing this one PR.
  • Dependencies — the step IDs that must merge first; none if it can start immediately.
  • Exit criteria — observable, verifiable conditions that prove the step is done: tests to pass, behavior to confirm, and the exact verification commands to run.
  • PR — title in English; body as Markdown linking the issue (Closes #N) when one exists. Open with gh when available; otherwise output the title and body for the human to open manually and say so.

Parallelism summary — the dependency graph (e.g. 1 -> 2 -> 4, 3 parallel to 2) and an explicit list of step sets that may run concurrently because they share no files and no dependency edge.

Done when

  • The plan has 3-12 steps, each one mergeable pull request.
  • Every step has a self-contained cold-start context brief, explicit dependencies, and observable exit criteria.
  • The parallelism summary states what can run concurrently and what must be sequential, with no hidden shared-file conflicts.
  • The Review pass found no remaining anti-patterns.
  • Branch, commit, and PR templates follow @rules/git/general.mdc and degrade gracefully when gh is absent.
  • The plan is registered as Markdown in the repo and its path is reported.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.