Install
$ agentstack add skill-pfangueiro-claude-code-agents-observability-stack ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Observability Stack
Overview
Production observability using the three pillars (metrics, logs, traces) with OpenTelemetry as the collection standard. Covers metric design, alerting strategies, dashboard patterns, and cost management.
The Three Pillars
| Pillar | What | Tool Stack | When | |--------|------|-----------|------| | Metrics | Numeric time-series data | Prometheus + Grafana | Trend detection, alerting, capacity | | Logs | Structured event records | Loki / ELK / CloudWatch | Debugging, audit trails, forensics | | Traces | Request flow across services | Tempo / Jaeger / X-Ray | Latency analysis, dependency mapping |
All three must be correlated via trace context (traceid, spanid) for effective debugging.
Metric Design
RED Method (Service-Level)
Measure what users experience. Apply to every service endpoint.
# Rate — requests per second
rate(http_requests_total{service="api"}[5m])
# Errors — error percentage
rate(http_requests_total{service="api", status=~"5.."}[5m])
/ rate(http_requests_total{service="api"}[5m]) * 100
# Duration — p99 latency
histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{service="api"}[5m]))
USE Method (Infrastructure-Level)
Measure what the infrastructure is doing. Apply to every resource.
| Resource | Utilization | Saturation | Errors | |----------|------------|------------|--------| | CPU | node_cpu_seconds_total | node_load15 / num_cpus | — | | Memory | node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes | node_memory_SwapFree_bytes | OOM events | | Disk | node_filesystem_avail_bytes | node_disk_io_time_weighted_seconds_total | node_disk_io_errors | | Network | node_network_transmit_bytes_total | node_network_transmit_drop_total | node_network_transmit_errs_total | | K8s Pod | CPU/mem requests vs limits | Throttling, evictions | CrashLoopBackOff count |
Naming Convention
Follow Prometheus naming: ___
http_requests_total # counter — always _total suffix
http_request_duration_seconds # histogram — always include unit
http_requests_in_flight # gauge — current value
SLI/SLO Monitoring
Define SLIs as Prometheus Recording Rules
groups:
- name: sli_rules
rules:
# Availability SLI: ratio of successful requests
- record: sli:availability:ratio_rate5m
expr: |
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[5m]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
# Latency SLI: ratio of requests faster than 300ms
- record: sli:latency:ratio_rate5m
expr: |
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.3"}[5m]))
/ sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[5m]))
Error Budget Calculation
# Error budget remaining (30-day window)
1 - (
(1 - avg_over_time(sli:availability:ratio_rate5m[30d]))
/ (1 - 0.999) # SLO target
)
Multi-Window Multi-Burn-Rate Alerts
Google SRE recommended approach — alert on budget consumption rate, not raw thresholds.
groups:
- name: slo_alerts
rules:
# Fast burn: 2% budget consumed in 1 hour → page
- alert: SLOBurnRateCritical
expr: |
(
1 - sli:availability:ratio_rate1h > (14.4 * (1 - 0.999))
and
1 - sli:availability:ratio_rate5m > (14.4 * (1 - 0.999))
)
for: 2m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "High error budget burn rate (fast burn)"
runbook_url: "https://wiki/runbooks/slo-burn-rate"
# Slow burn: 5% budget consumed in 6 hours → page
- alert: SLOBurnRateWarning
expr: |
(
1 - sli:availability:ratio_rate6h > (6 * (1 - 0.999))
and
1 - sli:availability:ratio_rate30m > (6 * (1 - 0.999))
)
for: 15m
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Elevated error budget burn rate (slow burn)"
# Gradual burn: 10% budget consumed in 3 days → ticket
- alert: SLOBurnRateTicket
expr: |
(
1 - sli:availability:ratio_rate3d > (1 * (1 - 0.999))
and
1 - sli:availability:ratio_rate6h > (1 * (1 - 0.999))
)
for: 1h
labels:
severity: ticket
Alert Quality Checklist
Every alert MUST have:
- [ ] Runbook link in annotations
- [ ] Clear summary describing what is wrong and impact
- [ ] Severity matching response expectation (page vs ticket vs log)
- [ ] Owner — which team is responsible
- [ ] Actionable — recipient can do something about it
- [ ] Tested — alert has fired in non-prod and was validated
Alert anti-patterns to avoid:
- Alerting on raw CPU% instead of SLO burn rate
- Flapping alerts (fire and resolve repeatedly)
- Alerts with no runbook ("figure it out yourself")
- Duplicate alerts for the same condition from different sources
- Alerts nobody looks at (alert fatigue → ignored pages)
Dashboard Design
Layer 1: Service Overview (start here)
One dashboard per team showing all owned services:
- Traffic (req/sec) per service
- Error rate per service (color: green 1%)
- p99 latency per service
- Error budget remaining per service (30-day window)
Layer 2: Per-Service Deep Dive
- RED metrics broken down by endpoint and status code
- Dependency health (upstream/downstream latencies)
- Recent deployments overlay on graphs
- Top errors table with counts and sample traces
Layer 3: Infrastructure
- USE metrics per node/pod
- Kubernetes resource utilization vs requests vs limits
- Pod restart counts, eviction counts
- Node health, disk pressure, memory pressure
Layer 4: Business Metrics
- Conversion rate, cart abandonment, signup completion
- Revenue per minute (correlated with system health)
- Feature flag adoption rates
OpenTelemetry Instrumentation
Auto-Instrumentation (Start Here)
# Node.js — auto-instrument without code changes
npm install @opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node
node --require @opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node/register app.js
# Python — auto-instrument without code changes
pip install opentelemetry-distro opentelemetry-exporter-otlp
opentelemetry-bootstrap -a install
opentelemetry-instrument python app.py
Manual Spans (Add Business Context)
import { trace } from '@opentelemetry/api';
const tracer = trace.getTracer('payment-service');
async function processPayment(order: Order) {
return tracer.startActiveSpan('process-payment', async (span) => {
span.setAttribute('order.id', order.id);
span.setAttribute('order.amount', order.amount);
span.setAttribute('payment.method', order.paymentMethod);
try {
const result = await chargeCard(order);
span.setAttribute('payment.status', 'success');
return result;
} catch (error) {
span.recordException(error);
span.setStatus({ code: SpanStatusCode.ERROR });
throw error;
} finally {
span.end();
}
});
}
Collector Configuration
# otel-collector-config.yaml
receivers:
otlp:
protocols:
grpc:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317
http:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4318
processors:
batch:
timeout: 5s
send_batch_size: 1000
memory_limiter:
check_interval: 1s
limit_mib: 512
exporters:
prometheus:
endpoint: 0.0.0.0:8889
loki:
endpoint: http://loki:3100/loki/api/v1/push
otlp/tempo:
endpoint: tempo:4317
tls:
insecure: true
service:
pipelines:
metrics:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [memory_limiter, batch]
exporters: [prometheus]
logs:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [memory_limiter, batch]
exporters: [loki]
traces:
receivers: [otlp]
processors: [memory_limiter, batch]
exporters: [otlp/tempo]
Structured Logging
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-21T10:30:00.000Z",
"level": "error",
"service": "payment-api",
"trace_id": "abc123def456",
"span_id": "789ghi",
"message": "Payment processing failed",
"error.type": "CardDeclinedException",
"error.message": "Insufficient funds",
"order.id": "ord-12345",
"http.method": "POST",
"http.path": "/api/payments",
"http.status_code": 402,
"duration_ms": 234
}
Rules:
- Always JSON, never unstructured text in production
- Include traceid and spanid for correlation
- Use consistent field names (follow OTel semantic conventions)
- Redact PII: credit card numbers, passwords, tokens, email addresses
- Log levels: ERROR (action needed), WARN (degraded), INFO (significant events), DEBUG (dev only, never in prod)
Cost Management
Observability can become expensive. Control costs with:
- Sampling: Use head-based (10% of traces) or tail-based (100% of errors/slow) in OTel Collector
- Retention: 15 days for metrics, 7 days for logs, 3 days for traces (adjust per need)
- Cardinality: Never use userid, requestid, or session_id as metric labels
- Aggregation: Pre-aggregate in recording rules, query aggregated data
- Tiering: Hot (recent, fast queries) → Warm (older, slower) → Cold (archive, S3)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: pfangueiro
- Source: pfangueiro/claude-code-agents
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.